Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 964)

frapi07 wrote on 03.11.2023 at 19:14:

I am aware that 9Live used many loopholes back then to get as many callers as possible. I'm also aware that the presenters can't help it. My only concern with Schradin was that he was taking everyone else for fools. On the YouTube video, one user made exactly my point. Since I sometimes can't express myself well, I'll copy his comment.

" Max, why did you tear off the solution board and throw it outside the picture - and why did you end up rolling around on the floor?
You usually never bobbed around on the floor for the solution. Only there. And you didn't see that the solution board was gone, did you? The glasses were probably at the dry cleaners, the contact lenses in the dishwasher, weren't they?
You took part and you didn't intervene.
If you can't remember, why don't you watch the video again?
Do you think we're mentally deranged? Admit it and that's fine. But taking us for fools is really the height of stupidity.
Of course you need eggs made of a titanium-diamond alloy to say "stop!" in a live recording. Absolutely clear. But now this dishonorable "ohh... my memory when the paper was on the floor ... I was so focused on the moderation ..." is really unbearable"

This post has been translated automatically

Pat1991 wrote on 03.11.2023 at 19:56:
Then you've never seen Jürgen Milski on the air. Here's a particularly "nice" example:



But Schradin never let himself get carried away either. I remember a game in which we had to find an animal from a set of letters. The letters displayed read quite easily as "anaconda". Then the whole mess started.

"This game is super difficult, probably no one has this animal".

"Director, as a hint, some people find the animal 'disgusting' and it's bigger than a meter, right?"

"Eleven thousand euros is a sure win. And you guarantee me that at least 11,000 euros will go out on 9Live today, right?"

"You can use the letters more than once, right?" Director: "Yes, that's right (mumbled quietly: but you don't necessarily have to...)".

The fact that they were looking for exactly one animal that was in an envelope was of course swept under the carpet a little... In the end, the "DON" came up, a breed of horse, and the elderly lady who was put through got 500 euros.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1 wrote on 04.11.2023 at 13:54: Jeton is cool yesterday 25 € deposited at Pino 350 withdrawal to Jeton took less than an hour and then in the evening decided to withdraw the money via crypto after 20 minutes received except for the fees actually a dream

They take 4 € for BT'C + 10 € I lost due to the network fee/course

But BTC annoys me either way forever my BTC not touched barely spent some of it the thing goes up of course

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07 wrote on 03.11.2023 at 20:53:
As I said, any male or female presenter would have hosted like Milski. None would have been better than the others. Even a Schradin would have done it. They didn't improvise. They just followed the instructions that were whispered in their ear. That was part of the working conditions. Before the presenter in your example video tried everything to persuade the woman not to give the solution she had given or even to let her slip up, he was told that the solution was there and that he should buy it from her. This was only done if the desired turnover was not achieved. It's clear, 2 simple names are supposed to suggest to the viewer that the game is simple and only simple names can appear and that you can win a lot of money with luck. Many will simply zap through and not know how long the game has been played. Another tactic that the broadcaster often used was that when the target is almost reached - they also show the wrong answers. If you watch the video of Milski, you'll see that only the correct answers are shown - and the answers are always visible on the wall. So it's actually unnecessary.

The same thing happened with another presenter. I'm sure the "frontal lobe basilisk" will tell you something. It's exactly the same procedure. The viewer guesses one of the more difficult answers too early - since the turnover has not yet been achieved, you try everything to get the viewer to take back the answer or make a promise or whatever.

I'm sure the Schradin was no different. He may have been able to get away with a bit more and shout like a lunatic, but I'm pretty sure that in scenes where he was "fighting" for the audience and "standing up" to the director, he was mostly standing up.

It's not really about the perfidious methods that 9Live used back then. My point is that until recently Schradin had the cheek to deny everything and act as if he had lost his memory. Either you skillfully ignore the questions - or you make a real statement. But to take the viewers - who are still following you on Twitch after all this crap - for fools shows me how self-centered this guy is.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically