Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 963)

Topic created on 14th Jan. 2019 | Page: 963 of 1311 | Answers: 13,101 | Views: 1,681,599
Anonym

slotliebe89 wrote on 03.11.2023 09:53:

With ODB ?

Method Man

This post has been translated automatically

slotliebe89
Elite
HerrLauer wrote on 03.11.2023 at 10:39 am:

Method Man

So High. Were you lurking or how did that come about?

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Elite
Pat1991 wrote on 02.11.2023 at 22:58:

He got involved in the questions let me call in live. Unfortunately, hardly anyone seemed to be interested in the stream. The hour-long pauses, unsolvable "super easy" animals with exactly 2x H etc. will have earned him a lot of money and remained unpunished.

What else can I say? It was very sobering to realize that the old childhood hero is only human. Water under the bridge.

The broadcaster has made a lot of money through these methods. He only received a salary and possibly a commission.

As you said, 9Live is passé - I agree. The reason why I still don't like this person is that years later he sells people for fools or wants to sell them for fools when he is asked about this topic. I write here and there - that everyone makes mistakes and it's okay. Not everyone is perfect and it's impossible to lead a perfect life. He was young, probably just wanted to make money and some moral values weren't that important to him. That's no reason for me to dislike a person. But if a person continues to do this and does not admit his partial guilt, but instead blames his superiors at the time, he is doing nothing other than protecting himself because he is perhaps afraid that the truth will damage his persona and also his "career". S please take a look at the video regarding Stearinlicht (not the one below, but the one that was broadcast on TV at the time) - that he then still has the cheek and thinks he is innocent, even though he was actively involved in the fraud (he "IMPOSSIBLY" took the sheet where the solutions were written off the screen)

Max Schradin speaks plainly about the STEARINLICHT of 9Live - YouTube maybe you already know this - but honestly now: 10 years after the station no longer exists, you can come out with the truth and also admit your mistakes. But he didn't at first - as I said, this kind of behavior doesn't appeal to me.

Incidentally, I can also understand that he may have been afraid of losing his job. Could he have behaved differently as a presenter? Definitely! There was a case like that in Italy (in the 90s and early 200s, TV games were also a trend there). There was a TV crossword puzzle to be solved and the guy who was supposed to be in charge of security passed the answers on to people he knew and let them win. When a viewer gave a correct answer without even having heard the question, the presenter confronted her and didn't shut up about it.

It's not a personal attack on you - of course you have the choice to find anyone you like likeable. That was just my two cents on him, nothing more.

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon

frapi07 wrote on 03.11.2023 at 13:40:
The broadcaster made a lot of money through these methods. He only received a salary and possibly a commission.

As you said, 9Live is passé - I agree. The reason why I still don't like this person is that years later he sells people for fools or wants to sell them for fools when he is asked about this topic. I write here and there - that everyone makes mistakes and it's okay. Not everyone is perfect and it's impossible to lead a perfect life. He was young, probably just wanted to make money and some moral values weren't that important to him. That's no reason for me to dislike a person. But if a person continues to do this and does not admit his partial guilt, but instead blames his superiors at the time, he is doing nothing other than protecting himself because he is perhaps afraid that the truth will damage his persona and also his "career". S please take a look at the video regarding Stearinlicht (not the one below, but the one that was broadcast on TV at the time) - that he then still has the cheek and thinks he is innocent, even though he was actively involved in the fraud (he "IMPOSSIBLY" took the sheet where the solutions were written off the screen)

Max Schradin speaks plainly about the STEARINLICHT of 9Live - YouTube maybe you already know this - but honestly now: 10 years after the station no longer exists, you can come out with the truth and also admit your mistakes. But he didn't at first - as I said, this kind of behavior doesn't appeal to me.

Incidentally, I can also understand that he may have been afraid of losing his job. Could he have behaved differently as a presenter? Definitely! There was a case like that in Italy (in the 90s and early 200s, TV games were also a trend there). There was a TV crossword puzzle to be solved and the guy who was supposed to be in charge of security passed the answers on to people he knew and let them win. When a viewer gave a correct answer without even having heard the question, the presenter confronted her and did not remain silent.

It's not a personal attack on you - of course you have the choice to find anyone you like likeable. That was just my two cents on him, nothing more.

The question is rather did the poor guy really get his money? I know the scene, I think I was even there live at the time, but how could you be so stupid and not realize that, especially since the solutions were always revealed immediately after the end of the game


9Live never had the best reputation but to believe it was an isolated case and a decision of an employee ? What should a normal employee get out of it? You can't be that stupid to believe that the broadcaster is happy according to the motto "wow, you saved us a lot of money", so the assumption is obvious that they wanted it that way from above

This post has been translated automatically

Pat1991
Top Member
I'm very familiar with what happened at 9Live. I know pretty much all the videos on the subject, I think, and have been upset about the channel for years. The classics were, of course, the unsolvable terms, which were all supposedly "very easy", the hour-long and absolutely planned pauses without any chance of winning the Jackpot, the lie of "randomly hitting" hot buttons.

It was a planned, gang-like "scam" from the outset, but probably bordered on the legal side. Monika's father is still very familiar to me, as are many other permanent winners. At Stearinlicht, permanent winner Nils got his money back then, but he was probably given a one-year break from playing: In any case, he couldn't be heard for that period.

Nevertheless, 9Live was closer to anarchy and joie de vivre than many other stations in life. I don't know of any other station where there was anywhere near as much action, so much spontaneity, despite the controlled processes and the often repetitive broadcasting schedule. Max Schradin let his hair down in front of the camera, that's more than many others have dared to do.

Unfortunately, like many others, he is a slave to his industry. And he has probably brought many things with him with joy. Nevertheless, he remains an irreplaceable part of my childhood.

This post has been translated automatically

Olli_Eule
Elite
HerrLauer wrote on 03.11.2023 at 06:31: I don't have any autographs, but I smoked one at various events in the 90s, for example.

Fantastic Four

Wu-Tang Clan

Cybress Hill


It was a good time...🥳

i'd love to meet some beautiful famous women, but I don't want to smoke nothing with them
but I'm too scared to talk to anyone at all...


Sonja Gerhardt, or Tiffy from Sesame Street, that would be it...I don't want to meet Samson, he eats too much

This post has been translated automatically

Donnie
Expert
himmel80 wrote on 03.11.2023 at 18:07:
i would like to meet beautiful famous women, but i don't want to smoke nothing with them
but I'm too scared to talk to anyone at all...


Sonja Gerhardt, or Tiffy from Sesame Street, that would be it...I don't want to meet Samson, he eats too much

For me it would probably be Ruth Moschner and this Palina🤣International Salma Hayek and Kirsten Dunst🤣

This post has been translated automatically

Olli_Eule
Elite
Donnie wrote on 03.11.2023 at 18:18:
For me it should be Ruth Moschner and this Palina🤣International Salma Hayek and Kirsten Dunst🤣

well Sonja Gerhardt that would be enough for me if I met her in Berlin.


in 2017 my mother and I were in Berlin and we met Anouska Renzi on the bus, my mother was sitting next to her.

I don't really like Ruth Moschner and Palina, and I don't really like the whole Pro 7 faction. Not Joko and Klaas either.

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Elite

gamble1 wrote on 03.11.2023 at 16:39:

The question is rather did the poor guy really get his money? I know the scene I think I was even there live at the time but how could you be so stupid and not notice it because otherwise the solutions were always revealed right after the end of the game


9Live never had the best reputation but to believe it was an isolated case and a decision of an employee ? What should a normal employee get out of it? You can't be that stupid to believe that the broadcaster is happy according to the motto "wow, you've saved us a lot of money", so the assumption is that they wanted it that way from above

Yes, the player received his money retrospectively. He had also hit a line that was worth €17,000. That was already noticed - but nothing was done because it was a live broadcast. They wanted to protect the broadcaster, of course. But after the broadcast, some people reported the incident. It's still too late for me. How badly must his ego have been hit that he doesn't even want to admit that he was actively involved in the fraud and is therefore an accomplice? Only a very egocentric guy could have this logic.

Pat1991 wrote on November 03, 2023 at 5:25 pm: I'm very familiar with what happened at 9Live. I know pretty much all the videos on the subject, I think, and have been upset with the channel for years. The classics, of course, were the unsolvable terms but all supposedly "very easy", the hours of absolutely planned out pauses with no chance of winning the Jackpot, the lie of "randomly hitting" hot buttons.

It was a planned, gang-like "scam" from the outset, but probably bordered on the legal side. Monika's father is still very familiar to me, as are many other permanent winners. At Stearinlicht, permanent winner Nils got his money back then, but he was probably given a one-year break from playing: In any case, he couldn't be heard for that period.

Nevertheless, 9Live was closer to anarchy and joie de vivre than many other stations in life. I don't know of any other station where there was anywhere near as much action, so much spontaneity, despite the controlled processes and the often repetitive broadcasting schedule. Max Schradin let his hair down in front of the camera, that's more than many others have dared to do.

Unfortunately, like many others, he is a slave to his industry. And he has probably brought many things with him with joy. Nevertheless, he remains an irreplaceable part of my childhood.

I am aware that 9Live used many loopholes back then to get as many callers as possible. I'm also aware that the presenters couldn't help it. My only concern with Schradin was that he was taking everyone else for fools. On the YouTube video, one user made exactly my point. Since I sometimes can't express myself well, I'll copy his comment.

" Max, why did you tear off the solution board and throw it outside the picture - and why did you end up rolling around on the floor?
You usually never bobbed around on the floor for the solution. Only there. And you didn't see that the solution board was gone, did you? The glasses were probably at the dry cleaners, the contact lenses in the dishwasher, weren't they?
You took part and you didn't intervene.
If you can't remember, why don't you watch the video again?
Do you think we're mentally deranged? Admit it and that's fine. But taking us for fools is really the height of stupidity.
Of course you need eggs made of a titanium-diamond alloy to say "stop!" in a live recording. Absolutely clear. But now this dishonorable "ohh... my memory when the paper was on the floor ... I was so focused on the moderation ..." is really unbearable"

This post has been translated automatically

Donnie
Expert

himmel80 wrote on 03.11.2023 at 19:00:
well Sonja Gerhardt that would be enough for me if I met her in Berlin.


in 2017 my mother and I were in Berlin and we met Anouska Renzi on the bus, my mother was sitting next to her.

I don't really like Ruth Moschner and Palina, and I don't really like the whole Pro 7 faction. Not Joko and Klaas either.

I hardly watch normal free TV now, but I have to admit that I really like these women. All 4 of them together and the party can begin😉 Seriously, if you met celebrities on the street I wouldn't know what to say, I wouldn't harass anyone. Toni Kroos' brother, Felix Kroos (more of a second division player), once said that he's quite happy not to be as well-known as his brother. If Toni Kroos goes anywhere, he is immediately besieged. They're just people like us normal people, I find paparazzi, for example, just disgusting

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics20th Sep. 2024 at 08:41 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately