Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 928)

Topic created on 14th Jan. 2019 | Page: 928 of 1360 | Answers: 13,595 | Views: 1,773,238
chriss1808
Experienced
and the question about the surveys?

This post has been translated automatically

Saphira
Expert

frapi07 wrote on 07.10.2023 at 23:28:

Yes, unfortunately true. As long as it is worth it there will be no end. So I hope GJ will set the conditions so high that it is just not worth the effort anymore. I mean, there is no disadvantage anyway. You can then just give the ratings later, whether I do that with 100 posts or 1000 posts is irrelevant. Since you can only do that once anyway, nothing is lost or you have no disadvantage.

It has for these people probably the disadvantage that it is not fast enough. One wants everything directly. 🙄


Maybe it would make sense to adjust the compensation for casino reviews and, for example, the most original / best casino review per casino once or twice a month to award with a higher sum and in compensation no longer reward everyone. Or to reward the best three. By which is not meant that you have to praise the casino if you are not convinced of it. The others get then just nothing, but can try again and again. So that it becomes for Gj no loss and for those, which collect now on devil come out, an incentive represents. But maybe that is not thought through, just occurred to me.

Well, let's wait and see what will be decided after the team meeting.

This post has been translated automatically

BinGOLDiG
Expert

Saphira wrote on 07/10/2023 at 23:45:

I guess it has the disadvantage for these people that it's not fast enough. After all, you want everything right away. 🙄


Maybe it would make sense to adjust the compensation for casino reviews and, for example, the most original / best casino review per casino once or twice a month to award with a higher sum and in compensation no longer reward everyone. Or to reward the best three. By which is not meant that you have to praise the casino if you are not convinced of it. The others get then just nothing, but can try again and again. So that it becomes for Gj no loss and for those, which collect now on devil come out, an incentive represents. But maybe that is not thought through, just occurred to me.

Well, lets wait and see what is decided after the team meeting.

Ooh no..Please don't!😵‍💫 I'm always unlucky with lotteries 😂

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert

chriss1808 wrote on 07.10.2023 at 23:40: and the question about the surveys?

you don't get paid for a survey. So don't do it

This post has been translated automatically

danny005
Elite

Langhans wrote on 07.10.2023 at 23:48:

you don't get paid for a survey. So don't

For some you do.

This post has been translated automatically

Saphira
Expert

BinGOLD wrote on 07/10/2023 at 23:47:

Ooh no..please don't!😵‍💫 I'm always unlucky with lotteries 😂

Wouldn't be a lottery in that sense, but a reward for quality

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert
danny005 wrote on 07.10.2023 at 23:48:

It is for some.

well then from me... Oh man...today is really one of the harder days here at GambleJoe. There are abysses... financially and also humanly (with it are not meant now you)

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon

Saphira wrote on 07.10.2023 at 23:45:It probably has the disadvantage for these people that it does not go fast enough. After all, you want everything directly. 🙄


Maybe it would make sense to adjust the compensation for casino reviews and for example award the most original/best casino review per casino once or twice a month with a higher sum and in compensation not reward everyone anymore. Or to reward the best three. By which is not meant that you have to praise the casino if you are not convinced of it. The others get then just nothing, but can try again and again. So that it becomes for Gj no loss and for those, which collect now on devil come out, an incentive represents. But maybe that is not thought through, just occurred to me.

Well, let's wait and see what is decided after the team meeting.

Or limit it that only one casino rating per month is remunerated? I see no problem in it. To whom the forum is really important and not only the rewards, which can live also very well with it, if it 2 or 3 years at time need, until all casinos listed here with a remuneration were evaluated. Lost would be one there also nothing.

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon
Stake7 does not verify on the WE ? Uploaded all my documents now last night exactly payment method at about 15:00 and ID and electricity bill in the middle of the night (that's when the links arrived first)

So first payout made on 05.10 until now nothing processed and nothing verified

Somehow everything is not so really timely alone Pino has me today 4 withdrawals after not even 3 hours on hold done

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Elite
Saphira wrote on 07/10/2023 at 23:45:

I guess it has the disadvantage for these people that it's not fast enough. After all, you want everything right away. 🙄


Maybe it would make sense to adjust the compensation for casino reviews and, for example, the most original / best casino review per casino once or twice a month to award with a higher sum and in compensation no longer reward everyone. Or to reward the best three. By which is not meant that you have to praise the casino if you are not convinced of it. The others get then just nothing, but can try again and again. So that it becomes for Gj no loss and for those, which collect now on devil come out, an incentive represents. But maybe that is not thought through, just occurred to me.

Well, let's wait and see what is decided after the team meeting.

To reward only the best would require a lot of effort. You have to read through all the reviews and that for each casino and betting provider. On the other hand: what criteria? What is a "good" and what is a "less good" rating? That would bring a lot of disadvantages.

Falko wrote on 08.10.2023 at 00:59:

Or limit it that only one casino rating per month is remunerated ? I see no problem in it. To whom the forum is really important and not only the rewards, which can also live very well with it, if it takes 2 or 3 years of time, until all casinos listed here have been evaluated with a remuneration. Lost would be one there also nothing.

A limit as you suggest it would not stop coinfarming. Then you just advertise 1x a month a casino and logs out. Coinfarming can only be stopped if the standards are set so high that it is no longer worthwhile. How to stop it: set a minimum of words (100 words) for users who have the rank "newbie" and "visitor". Otherwise we have such heroes, who then just try to get together the contributions on cramp and write only one sentence, which brings no added value for the thread (especially with completed surveys). In addition, you should unlock the compensation for casino reviews from 1000 posts.


I know my suggestions are very strict, but I personally don't see any other solution there. You have to be aggressive about it. GJ did try a softer approach at first, but as you can see, it doesn't work. Not because the basic idea is bad, but because the hurdles have simply been set too low.


This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 01:21 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately