Well,I don't know what good ideas come from them at the moment.
In principle, every idea for climate protection is a good idea.
And the whole thing costs something, also each individual, was also clear.
Only on purely national level it is actually relatively pointless. And that the people with the least money suffer the most, while those who have enriched themselves for decades without regard to losses, continue to do so, it can not be.
The only problem is that even under changing climatic conditions, the poor people will suffer the most.
In principle, any idea to protect the climate is a good idea first.
And the whole thing costs what, also each individual, was also clear.
Only on purely national level it is actually relatively pointless. And that the people with the least money suffer the most, while those who have enriched themselves for decades without regard to losses, continue to do so, it can not be.
The only problem is that even under changing climatic conditions, the poor people will suffer the most.
And that is exactly the problem.
We alone cannot save the world. And then shut down the nuclear power plants and our neighbors build new ones. Just now we need it so urgently
And we then buy the electricity from our neighbors, that's perverse. And then still do so as if the broad masses find that good.
16% have chosen the Greens, 84% but not and you push their ideology on them.
In principle, any idea to protect the climate is a good idea first.
And the whole thing costs what, also each individual, was also clear.
Only on purely national level it is actually relatively pointless. And that the people with the least money suffer the most, while those who have enriched themselves for decades without regard to losses, continue to do so, it can not be.
The problem is only that also under changing climatic conditions, the poor people will suffer the most.
That's nonsense. A rising global temperature is not per se bad for humans. In the Middle Ages warm phase one could grow wine in Scandinavia. That's great.
The solution is: adaptation. There is no other way. And man is also capable of it as history proves.
But the climate religion tries to negate this and thinks that mankind will perish if it gets warmer.
Bullshit. A rising global temperature is not per se bad for humans. You could grow wine in Scandinavia during the medieval warm period. It's great.
The solution is: adaptation. There is no other way. And man is also capable of it as history proves.
But the climate religion tries to negate this and thinks that mankind will perish if it gets warmer.
This will not be of much use to the people in North Africa if the Scandinavians grow wine.
Of course, the climate will always change, even without human intervention, and only adaptation helps, that's true.... Nevertheless, you can try to reduce the part that man contributes to it as much as possible.
upola wrote on 04/21/2023 at 11:21 am:
And that is exactly the problem.
We alone cannot save the world. And then shut down the nuclear power plants and our neighbors build new ones. Just now we need it so urgently
And we then buy the electricity from our neighbors, that's perverse. And then still do so as if the broad masses find that good.
16% have chosen the Greens, 84% but not and you push their ideology on them.
Yes the shutdown of nuclear power plants has nothing to do with climate protection, that's clear. That is pure ideology.
A question Platin had today again an offer with 100% bonus + Send a quote to the VIP support and according to the statement in the e-mail you will receive a bonus between 10 € and 500 €, depending on the like of the quote
So now I have had really good luck with the 100% bonus and a good payout achieved and unfortunately still no answer from VIP support get therefore the question has anyone already received an answer to his quote ? And what do you think they really decide after like or not like when they award the bonus or do you think that is so similar to the deals where it depends only on the deposited amount or how the account currently looks?
The 30 free games were also in the account and I'm never lucky in the game of course I get now in the last Dreher free spins and may convert 650 for 100 € because I won 60 €
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Well good ideas at the core but once again a modest implementation always the same
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: garfield68
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Well, I do not know at the moment what good ideas comes from them.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
In principle, every idea for climate protection is a good idea.
And the whole thing costs something, also each individual, was also clear.
Only on purely national level it is actually relatively pointless. And that the people with the least money suffer the most, while those who have enriched themselves for decades without regard to losses, continue to do so, it can not be.
The only problem is that even under changing climatic conditions, the poor people will suffer the most.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Max_Bet, Saphira
And that is exactly the problem.
We alone cannot save the world. And then shut down the nuclear power plants and our neighbors build new ones. Just now we need it so urgently
And we then buy the electricity from our neighbors, that's perverse. And then still do so as if the broad masses find that good.
16% have chosen the Greens, 84% but not and you push their ideology on them.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Falko, Max_Bet, Saphira
That's nonsense. A rising global temperature is not per se bad for humans. In the Middle Ages warm phase one could grow wine in Scandinavia. That's great.
The solution is: adaptation. There is no other way. And man is also capable of it as history proves.
But the climate religion tries to negate this and thinks that mankind will perish if it gets warmer.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This will not be of much use to the people in North Africa if the Scandinavians grow wine.
Of course, the climate will always change, even without human intervention, and only adaptation helps, that's true.... Nevertheless, you can try to reduce the part that man contributes to it as much as possible.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes the shutdown of nuclear power plants has nothing to do with climate protection, that's clear. That is pure ideology.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
So now I have had really good luck with the 100% bonus and a good payout achieved and unfortunately still no answer from VIP support get therefore the question has anyone already received an answer to his quote ? And what do you think they really decide after like or not like when they award the bonus or do you think that is so similar to the deals where it depends only on the deposited amount or how the account currently looks?
The 30 free games were also in the account and I'm never lucky in the game of course I get now in the last Dreher free spins and may convert 650 for 100 € because I won 60 €
This post has been translated automatically