-
TennisFreak, on 14th Sep. 2024 at 07:52 pm CEST
-
Butterbrezel, on 11th Sep. 2024 at 07:46 pm CEST
-
Daniel1988, today at 04:20 am CEST
-
Marinaf21, today at 01:14 am CEST
-
Olli_Eule, today at 12:42 am CEST
-
Maze168, today at 12:27 am CEST
-
Saphira, yesterday at 10:56 pm CEST
-
Daniel1988, yesterday at 10:53 pm CEST
-
Ariana, yesterday at 10:42 pm CEST
-
Malganes, yesterday at 09:54 pm CEST
-
Olli_Eule, yesterday at 08:01 pm CEST
-
XXLEONIDASXX, yesterday at 06:57 pm CEST
-
JJepsa96, yesterday at 06:33 pm CEST
-
JJepsa96, yesterday at 06:30 pm CEST
-
Betmacher01, yesterday at 01:49 pm CEST
-
Chriiiis, yesterday at 01:21 pm CEST
-
Memoak447, on 18th Sep. 2024 at 02:44 pm CEST
-
danny005, on 18th Sep. 2024 at 02:30 pm CEST
-
moralischverwerflich, on 18th Sep. 2024 at 11:51 am CEST
-
Malganes, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 10:58 pm CEST
-
MisterL, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 08:49 pm CEST
-
playermarv00, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 07:26 pm CEST
-
Max_Bet, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 05:56 pm CEST
-
BZASCH1, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 01:53 pm CEST
-
Donnie, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 12:27 pm CEST
-
Paddington, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 08:18 am CEST
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
There are simply raised the limits that one may have in the blood. The stoned driving problem is already solved.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
What happens in your opinion after the point of technological singularity? Or will we never reach it?
This is what wiki writes about the possible effects in the first paragraph:
"The technological singularity limits the human horizon of experience, according to the proponents of the hypothesis. The created superintelligence could acquire an understanding of the reality which goes beyond any imagination; the effects could be grasped with it by the human consciousness at no present time, since they would be determined by an intelligence which would be perpetually superior to the human one. Evolution could move from the realm of biology to that of technology."
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technologische_Singularit%C3%A4t#Auswirkungen
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
OK, of course you can argue that many technical achievements in earlier times were considered science fiction.
And for sure the military AI is already much more advanced than the publicly available AI like Chat GPT.
Even if the point of no return is reached and the AI develops a consciousness, we are already underground.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
So when playing Poker, chess and GO, the AI is already better than humans. But it is still possible that it will never fully reach the same level as humans. I would like to exclude neither the one nor the other for the time being.
But what is certain is that AI will probably never be able to feel empathy or emotions in general. As a logical concept, perhaps, but that's hardly the same thing. Maybe it will even interpret emotions in general as some kind of weakness, considering how much suffering happens e.g. due to violated sense of honor. I fear that she could make ethically very questionable decisions for us, for example if she is given the task to make life sustainable for all species on this earth. It could come there on the idea that the people are much too many and must be reduced on a compatible measure.
I also don't believe that the rules we implement for an AI will last forever. So that the AI hacks itself, and maybe only pretends to us that it is still cool with us.
I will definitely look into this topic further, I think the current possibilities are pretty crazy with all the "text to 3d model" etc. possibilities. Possibilities. In 1,2 years it will be much better than now. You can already imagine how games will be created in the future.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Saphira
So, if you are so unstable that you kill yourself because of a few statements of a computer program, then the AI is certainly not to blame. Just as well you could have blamed the media, because they are stirring up the climate panic every day.
The AI will be as "good" or "bad" as the developers set it to be. If you look at the unscrupulousness of the politicians, it is safe to assume that the AI will not be to our advantage - see surveillance state China.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
We have already stamped so much as impossible who can say how it looks in 100 years?
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Anonym, Bluff, Max_Bet
Today at 11:30 am press conference with Karl Lauterbach regarding the legalization.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: needle34
Can this then end right about so please?
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
I tried this out yesterday and downloaded a chat bot. It was very neutral regarding statements about future events, always left all options open. What I found quite impressive was that he spit out a correct solution for a problem in 2 seconds, although this problem probably knows the name of only 1 in 1000, if you would ask in the pedestrian zone.
Partially the bot also puts questions back, which let one ponder first. Already a very useful tool, so far just more like a kind of improved interactive wiki, but is also only the beginning.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Anonym, Bluff, gagapapamama, garfield68, needle34
This post has been translated automatically