Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 701)

Topic created on 14th Jan. 2019 | Page: 701 of 1346 | Answers: 13,450 | Views: 1,748,333
Anonym
A comparison between citizen money and pension as well as to the working people lags enormously. For several decades the compulsory costs rise continuously, the unemployed suffer in this country already enough, not necessarily because of the insufficient subsidy of the state, rather because of the disgusting society, which predominantly call the Hartzer a lazy drinking armchair seat.

Germany has enough money to finance everything;
a) basic income
b) basic pension
c) minimum wage 20€

However, there are other interests on the part of the government and their voters

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon

Royal777 wrote on 26.11.2022 at 18:31: A comparison between citizen's money and pension as well as to the working people lags tremendously. Since several decades the compulsory costs rise continuously, the unemployed suffer in this country already enough, not necessarily because of the insufficient subsidy of the state, rather because of the disgusting society, which predominantly title the Hartzer as a lazy drinking armchair seat.

Germany has enough money to finance everything;
a) basic income
b) basic pension
c) minimum wage 20€

However, there are other interests on the part of the government and their voters

But if you assume there is a basic income of say 1000 € per month and then someone can freely decide whether he wants more through work but there will still be people who say haha you unemployed

This post has been translated automatically

mowolum
Elite
In neighboring countries, it works with the basic income.
Only in our country, far too many people have something to say to prevent it.
It could go to the little man too well.
If everyone pays into the pension system, the pension would also be secured.
The officials should also pay in.
Who wants to pay the pensions in a few years?
The extension of working hours is just window dressing. So there is no pension security.

There will always be unemployed.
Anyone can become unemployed due to adverse circumstances.
But who does not want to work and there are enough of it, it is still made too easy for them
(this is my personal opinion and in no way personally meant).
There is enough work, otherwise we would not have so many vacancies) but it is not always the dream job.

This post has been translated automatically

Skitch22
Elite

mowolum wrote on 26.11.2022 at 19:14: In neighboring countries it works with the basic income.
Only with us far too many have what to say to prevent that.
It could be too good for the little man.
If everyone pays into the pension system .the pension would also be secured.
The officials should also pay in.
Who wants to pay the pensions in a few years?
The extension of working hours is just window dressing. So there is no pension security.

There will always be unemployed.
Anyone can become unemployed due to adverse circumstances.
But who does not want to work and there are enough of it, it is still made too easy for them
(this is my personal opinion and in no way personally meant).
There is enough work, otherwise we would not have so many vacancies) but it is not always the dream job.

I also think everyone should pay into the pension fund

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
"Around 25.8 million people receive a pension from the German pension Insurance scheme. Deducting orphans' pensions, there are a proud 21.2 million pension recipients as of 2020. Only a fraction of these receive 2000 euros or more each month: In 2015, there were just 97,271 people affected."
Focus Online
That is just 0.5%. If everyone in Germany worked then there would be a maximum doubling to around 1%, if that.

It is shaken out annually 350 billion in pension (pension expenses), while the net costs for ALG 2 recipients are only at 15 billion...
Federal Statistical Office

15 billion per year, that are peanuts compared to our International expenditures

This post has been translated automatically

mowolum
Elite
These are apples compared to oranges and justify neither.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite

mowolum wrote on 26.11.2022 at 19:14: In neighboring countries it works with the basic income.
Only with us have far too many what to say to prevent that.
It could be too good for the little man.
If everyone pays into the pension system .the pension would also be secured.
The officials should also pay in.
Who wants to pay the pensions in a few years?
The extension of working hours is just window dressing. So there is no pension security.

There will always be unemployed.
Anyone can become unemployed due to adverse circumstances.
But who does not want to work and there are enough of it, it is still made too easy for them
(this is my personal opinion and in no way personally meant).
There is enough work, otherwise we would not have so many vacancies) but it is not always the dream job.

I agree with you about the need to reform the pension system.

But a basic income (whether it would work or not) does not exist in any of our neighboring countries.
There have been a few pilot projects, for example in Finland, but the truth is that a basic income has never been introduced anywhere and the truth is that we simply have too little evidence about whether such a concept would really work. Personally, of course, I would welcome it, but I would never sign off on it without a solid economic calculation.

This post has been translated automatically

Skitch22
Elite
Skitch22 wrote on 11/26/2022 at 7:18 pm

I also think everyone should pay into the pension fund

My sister is a civil servant in the administration gets a decent pension, civil servants have it so good that can hardly happen. And the work is also very pleasant. But the system is so unfair. Germany has too many civil servants.

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend

Bone wrote on 11/26/2022 at 7:37 pm

I agree with you yes about reforming the pension system.

But a basic income (whether it would work or not) does not exist in any of our neighboring countries.
There have been a few pilot projects, for example in Finland, but the truth is that no basic income has ever been introduced anywhere and the truth is that we simply have too little evidence about whether such a concept would really work. Personally, I would welcome it, of course, but would never sign off on it without a solid economic calculation.

There are still bones😁

This post has been translated automatically

B****3

Skitch22 wrote on 26.11.2022 at 19:37
My sister is a civil servant in the administration who gets a decent pension, civil servants have it so good those can hardly happen. And the work is also very pleasant. But the system is so unfair. Germany has too many civil servants.

Why didn't you become a civil servant?


What does that have to do with unfair? Everyone is free to become a civil servant !

And that every civil servant has a great job I doubt!
Is just like in the free economy, there are good and bad jobs!

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics2nd Nov. 2024 at 07:18 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately