Stromberg wrote on 18.01.2022 at 15:10
https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/2021/09/20/das-video-die-pandemie-in-rohdaten-laesst-kontext-aus-und-fuehrt-so-in-die-irre/
Correctiv should not be used as a source of information.
In May 2020, the Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court ruled that Correctiv's presentation of a fact check was "misleading for the average user" and thus not permissible. Correctiv operates an interference with the freedom of opinion and information disguised as a fact check.
https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/medien/tichy-siegt-gegen-recherchegruppe-correctiv-vor-gericht-16789353.html
Nevertheless, I think it is okay to look at other opinions and presumed facts. The more information about a topic, the better.
But then you have to watch the whole video. That's what the "fact check" refers to.
Or I'll watch the part about the intensive care beds and you'll only read the corresponding part. 😂
I'm actually fed up with it and don't feel like watching such a long video😉😂
Stromberg wrote on 18.01.2022 at 15:28
Or I'll watch the part about ICU beds and you just read the related part too. 😂
I'm actually sick of it and don't feel like watching such a long video😉😂
Royal777 wrote on 18.01.2022 at 15:28
Correctiv should not be used as a source of information.
In May 2020, the Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court ruled that Correctiv's presentation of a fact check was "misleading for the average user" and thus not permissible. Correctiv operates an interference with the freedom of opinion and information disguised as a fact check.
https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/medien/tichy-siegt-gegen-recherchegruppe-correctiv-vor-gericht-16789353.html
Nevertheless, I think it is okay to look at other opinions and presumed facts. The more information about a topic, the better.
So 1. it is about a! Case
2. Have you the quotes there I think something I say " unhappy " merged.
" Correctiv operates an intervention disguised as fact check in the freedom of opinion and information."
According to my understanding of the article, the sentence does not come from the court, but from Tichys Anwalt.... Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong...
I propose that we remove Lauterbach as Minister of Health - and nominate Falke, for example.
Apart from that I recommend "such boys" a Corona station.
Possibly you could make yourselves times a picture locally and/or from the facts, thus instead of here with your s.g. medium knowledge to brag, your personal course etc. and simply times the facts before eye let lead
Oh yes...I am a simple man "Hauptschüler" - believe Pauschal nothing - but am open to everything - get my info from my son (doctor) or my wife (intensive care nurse) - still in good health - can Facebook or other / similar troll media totally nothing agewinnen
Otherwise, I find myself very nice, begrudge everyone his free opinion, but find torch runners really stupid (meanwhile, there are street lamps), death threats a bit excessive, freely after the motto "violence is never a solution" - "walks / r" past a Corona intensive care unit (as recently happened in Ibbenbüren) very shameful (could continue this, but I'll leave) so etc.....
Oh yes and I have been vaccinated with Johnson & J as well as Biontech, furthermore against Malaria -Tetanus - Polio - Diphtheria Pertussis - Yellow Fever and a lot of other things (I travel a lot around the world, mainly for diving) and would be vaccinated again at any time, with and against whatever.
Furthermore, I smoke - and the box says that smoking threatens my potency, 70 substances contains the proven carcinogenic
Stromberg wrote on 18.01.2022 at 15:47
So 1. it is about a case
2. Have you the quotes there I think something I say " unfortunate" merged.
" Correctiv operates an interference in the freedom of opinion and information disguised as fact check."
According to my understanding of the article, the sentence does not come from the court, but from Tichys Anwalt.... Correct me gladly, if I am wrong...
The fact is that Correctiv employs former mainstream journalists who are sponsored by the usual suspect organizations
Correctiv makes propaganda and most of the "fact checks" are nothing more than lies and false claims. Like that it is a conspiracy theory that there is a second lockdown, or that one is only allowed to participate in social life with an immunity card, or that there would be an inflation, or that the test also delivers false positive results and and and
If you read this once, you will realize that pretty much everything the fact checkers claim is a VT has come true
All the fact checkers have only one task and you have just seen it wonderfully. There comes for example a critical video which spreads fast. People then talk about it and tell their friends and relatives. But they still believe in the government propaganda and then google it
Google shows then with indication of the term immediately in the first place the so-called fact check. where then with completely flimsy arguments the information is tried to dismiss as Spinnerei. The mainstream believer reads then only that briefly through and stamps the video immediately. And his acquaintance who has sent the video likewise. The actual video is then not even looked at, because you know now anyway that it is nonsense, say it but the super-serious EU-funded fact checkers
The fact checkers are the firewall of the system, so to speak. They immediately nip any attempt to deal with critical content in the bud
Ichbins2018 wrote on 18.01.2022 at 15:56: I suggest that we remove Lauterbach as Minister of Health - and nominate e.g. Falke.
Apart from that I recommend "such boys" a Corona station.
Possibly you could make yourselves times a picture locally and/or from the facts, thus instead here with your s.g. medium knowledge to brag, your personal course etc. and simply times the facts before eye to let lead
Oh yes...I am a simple man "Hauptschüler" - believe Pauschal nothing - but am open to everything - get my info from my son (doctor) or my wife (intensive care nurse) - still in good health - can Facebook or other / similar troll media totally nothing agewinnen
Otherwise, I find myself very nice, begrudge everyone his free opinion, but find torch runners really stupid (meanwhile, there are street lamps), death threats a bit excessive, freely after the motto "violence is never a solution" - "walks / r" past a Corona intensive care unit (as recently happened in Ibbenbüren) very shameful (could continue this, but I'll leave) so etc.....
Oh yes and I have been vaccinated with Johnson & J as well as Biontech, furthermore against Malaria -Tetanus - Polio - Diphtheria Pertussis - Yellow Fever and a lot of other things (I travel a lot around the world, mainly for diving) and would be vaccinated again at any time, with and against whatever.
Furthermore, I smoke - and the box says that smoking threatens my potency, 70 substances contains the proven carcinogenic
Oh yes ... I feel fantastic.
You are confusing something crucial
I have absolutely nothing against your life model or what you do with your body.
It is only about the measures ordered by the state, which clearly violate fundamental rights and are also scientifically untenable
I would be on board with the Swedish model immediately. Self-protection, self-responsibility and respect for the inalienable fundamental rights without which a free society is not possible
I can fully accept and respect your view and opinion, as long as you do not demand that I have to do exactly the same as you and that also becomes law
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
Chatterbox
18th Jan. 2022, at 04:03 pm CET#5299
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Stromberg wrote on 18.01.2022 at 15:47
So 1. this is about a! Case
2. Have you the quotes there I think something I say " unhappy" merged.
" Correctiv operates an interference in the freedom of opinion and information disguised as fact check."
According to my understanding of the article, the sentence does not come from the court, but from Tichys Anwalt.... Correct me gladly, if I am wrong...
Here, of course, I have to agree with you. I did not want to link you the article from the FAZ, sry. This was only given as a source at Wiki
I have my appropriate quotations from Wikipedia and your statement is of course correct!
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correctiv#:~:text=Correctiv%20betreibe%20einen%20as%20Faktencheck,und%20damit%20nicht%20zul%C3%A4ssig%20sei.
Falke wrote on 18.01.2022 at 15:56
The fact is that Correctiv employs former mainstream journalists who are sponsored by the usual suspect organizations
Correctiv does propaganda and most of the "fact checks" are nothing but lies and false claims. Like that it is a conspiracy theory that there is a second lockdown, or that one is only allowed to participate in social life with an immunity card, or that there would be an inflation, or that the test also delivers false positive results and and and
If you read this once, you will realize that pretty much everything the fact checkers claim is a VT has come true
All the fact checkers have only one task and you have just seen it wonderfully. There comes for example a critical video which spreads fast. People then talk about it and tell their friends and relatives. But they still believe in the government propaganda and then google it
Google shows then with indication of the term immediately in the first place the so-called fact check. where then with completely flimsy arguments the information is tried to dismiss as Spinnerei. The mainstream believer reads then only that briefly through and stamps the video immediately. And his acquaintance who has sent the video as well. The actual video is then not even looked at, because you know now anyway that it is nonsense, say it but the super-serious EU-funded fact checkers
The fact checkers are the firewall of the system, so to speak. They immediately nip any attempt to deal with critical content in the bud.
Do I see differently, have already read some, mostly after I have seen or read the video o the article, and find it extremely important for classification
No question, these fact checks should of course also check the news of the leading media.
Otherwise, it is but just because of such things as written above by royal important
He suggests, I think unintentionally in this case, the court said something, but which obviously does not come from the court and the masses believe that because too lazy to research...
Because the average facebooknutzer is perhaps not able to classify the fact check correctly, which is chewed to him in umpteen Youtube videos and from any graphics "underpinned" he is then probably also not able to grasp neutrally
Royal777 wrote on 18.01.2022 at 16:03
I have to agree with you here, of course. I did not want to link you the article from the FAZ, sry. This was only given as a source at Wiki
My corresponding quotes I have from Wikipedia and your statement is of course correct!
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correctiv#:~:text=Correctiv%20betreibe%20einen%20as%20Faktencheck,und%20damit%20nicht%20zul%C3%A4ssig%20sei.
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Anonym, Falke, Saphira
Correctiv should not be used as a source of information.
In May 2020, the Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court ruled that Correctiv's presentation of a fact check was "misleading for the average user" and thus not permissible. Correctiv operates an interference with the freedom of opinion and information disguised as a fact check.
https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/medien/tichy-siegt-gegen-recherchegruppe-correctiv-vor-gericht-16789353.html
Nevertheless, I think it is okay to look at other opinions and presumed facts. The more information about a topic, the better.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Or I'll watch the part about the intensive care beds and you'll only read the corresponding part. 😂
I'm actually fed up with it and don't feel like watching such a long video😉😂
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Well, let's do it this way
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Anonym
So 1. it is about a! Case
2. Have you the quotes there I think something I say " unhappy " merged.
" Correctiv operates an intervention disguised as fact check in the freedom of opinion and information."
According to my understanding of the article, the sentence does not come from the court, but from Tichys Anwalt.... Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong...
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Arschi, B****3, Caro, Dutch78, Jubla2014, palme7777, ShakhtarD
Apart from that I recommend "such boys" a Corona station.
Possibly you could make yourselves times a picture locally and/or from the facts, thus instead of here with your s.g. medium knowledge to brag, your personal course etc. and simply times the facts before eye let lead
Oh yes...I am a simple man "Hauptschüler" - believe Pauschal nothing - but am open to everything - get my info from my son (doctor) or my wife (intensive care nurse) - still in good health - can Facebook or other / similar troll media totally nothing agewinnen
Otherwise, I find myself very nice, begrudge everyone his free opinion, but find torch runners really stupid (meanwhile, there are street lamps), death threats a bit excessive, freely after the motto "violence is never a solution" - "walks / r" past a Corona intensive care unit (as recently happened in Ibbenbüren) very shameful (could continue this, but I'll leave) so etc.....
Oh yes and I have been vaccinated with Johnson & J as well as Biontech, furthermore against Malaria -Tetanus - Polio - Diphtheria Pertussis - Yellow Fever and a lot of other things (I travel a lot around the world, mainly for diving) and would be vaccinated again at any time, with and against whatever.
Furthermore, I smoke - and the box says that smoking threatens my potency, 70 substances contains the proven carcinogenic
Oh yes ... I feel fantastic.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Saphira
The fact is that Correctiv employs former mainstream journalists who are sponsored by the usual suspect organizations
Correctiv makes propaganda and most of the "fact checks" are nothing more than lies and false claims. Like that it is a conspiracy theory that there is a second lockdown, or that one is only allowed to participate in social life with an immunity card, or that there would be an inflation, or that the test also delivers false positive results and and and
If you read this once, you will realize that pretty much everything the fact checkers claim is a VT has come true
All the fact checkers have only one task and you have just seen it wonderfully. There comes for example a critical video which spreads fast. People then talk about it and tell their friends and relatives. But they still believe in the government propaganda and then google it
Google shows then with indication of the term immediately in the first place the so-called fact check. where then with completely flimsy arguments the information is tried to dismiss as Spinnerei. The mainstream believer reads then only that briefly through and stamps the video immediately. And his acquaintance who has sent the video likewise. The actual video is then not even looked at, because you know now anyway that it is nonsense, say it but the super-serious EU-funded fact checkers
The fact checkers are the firewall of the system, so to speak. They immediately nip any attempt to deal with critical content in the bud
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Saphira
You are confusing something crucial
I have absolutely nothing against your life model or what you do with your body.
It is only about the measures ordered by the state, which clearly violate fundamental rights and are also scientifically untenable
I would be on board with the Swedish model immediately. Self-protection, self-responsibility and respect for the inalienable fundamental rights without which a free society is not possible
I can fully accept and respect your view and opinion, as long as you do not demand that I have to do exactly the same as you and that also becomes law
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Here, of course, I have to agree with you. I did not want to link you the article from the FAZ, sry. This was only given as a source at Wiki
I have my appropriate quotations from Wikipedia and your statement is of course correct!
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correctiv#:~:text=Correctiv%20betreibe%20einen%20as%20Faktencheck,und%20damit%20nicht%20zul%C3%A4ssig%20sei.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Do I see differently, have already read some, mostly after I have seen or read the video o the article, and find it extremely important for classification
No question, these fact checks should of course also check the news of the leading media.
Otherwise, it is but just because of such things as written above by royal important
He suggests, I think unintentionally in this case, the court said something, but which obviously does not come from the court and the masses believe that because too lazy to research...
Because the average facebooknutzer is perhaps not able to classify the fact check correctly, which is chewed to him in umpteen Youtube videos and from any graphics "underpinned" he is then probably also not able to grasp neutrally
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Okidoki👍
This post has been translated automatically