Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 257)

unicorn wrote on 20.09.2020 at 11:27 am
and I'm even pretty sure of that, because I also "investigated" once. It is striking that she of all people, who regularly organizes puzzles and competitions, did not participate in the competition...

In the connection, where against the Melder of the profit play is rushed, it holds itself also beautifully fine out, where it must give nevertheless otherwise always and everywhere its Senf in addition

Well, have I unmasked you?

This post has been translated automatically

snopsim wrote on 20.09.2020 at 15:59
What a pointless argument to defame them for no reason again! The sweepstakes was open for just 1 hour, so the majority of users who are not online 24/7 could not participate!

This post has been translated automatically

unicorn wrote on 20.09.2020 at 16:14
If she writes to me privately, insinuates something for no reason and thus outes herself as forum police then I can make my allegations too

This post has been translated automatically

Jokerboy wrote on 20.09.2020 at 17:24
I really believe that, that you are sad that the action just ended
But have you ever looked in the rules? It is now forbidden and whether someone reported it now or in China falls a bag of rice. I wondered anyway what the organizer was thinking. And then to oppose this rule and still carry out the action I find really brazen! That he was not banned for it, borders on a miracle!

And times to the report of a contribution: Straight a humans such as you, it will very welcome, if GJ will remunerate soon the report of contributions. I strongly assume that something like this will happen, because the troubleshooting will also become more difficult with time and then you will see who is playing "police" here.

This post has been translated automatically

Bones wrote on 20.09.2020 at 11:25 am
But also think that it must be a regular user. The fact of linking RebellYell to Ronny and his problem is already a strong indication. In that case, Iseedeadpeople is probably right.

Nevertheless, all the accusations of who is who annoy me. I've read this so many times and if only half of these accusations were true, the forum would consist of about 7 people who permanently argue with themselves.

This post has been translated automatically

Jokerboy wrote on 20.09.2020 at 17:24
I really believe that, that you are sad that the action just ended
But have you ever looked in the rules? It is now forbidden and whether someone reported it now or in China falls a bag of rice. I wondered anyway, what the organizer has thought. And then to oppose this rule and still carry out the action I find really brazen! That he was not banned for it, borders on a miracle!

And times to the report of a contribution: Straight a humans such as you, it will very welcome, if GJ will remunerate soon the report of contributions. I strongly assume that something like this will happen, because the troubleshooting will also become more difficult with time and then you will see who is playing "police" here.

This post has been translated automatically

Jokerboy wrote on 20/09/2020 at 17:24: ... will appreciate if GJ will soon remunerate the reporting of contributions.

This post has been translated automatically

Tribeholz wrote on 09/22/2020 at 4:17 pm

This would be interesting for users with a tendency to have multiple accounts


You simply create a few "rant accounts" in addition to your "serious" accounts.
Then you talk yourself to the worst full, report this and collect the remuneration.
I think GJ would soon go bankrupt......

This post has been translated automatically

How was your start to the week?

This post has been translated automatically

Falko wrote on 22/09/2020 at 18:11
Not really good. New week new luck has not confirmed yesterday with me in the casinos

This post has been translated automatically