Does jmand really have the slot with 100€ bet? The super bonus then costs 5000x, so 500.000€ and you could win 500.000x, so 50 Mil Bonus Buy can be made up as a normal and to get the super bonus in the base game and then one that brings max win is I think like a euro Jackpot win xD
The highest I've seen so far was 50€ bet. So a paltry 25 million max win. So it's not really worth it.
maybe it's just me who is irritated by such a formulation, but in the course of a No Deposit AZ at betathome I just read the following message:" Note: Leave funds in your betting account until the end of the month, as withdrawals followed by deposits will count towards your deposit limit"
If it said: "Further deposits following a withdrawal will be added to your deposit limit", everything would be fine for me logically, but a withdrawal can never be added to a deposit limit, as it says in version 1 above. Or is BAH thinking sport on a Sunday morning not the right thing for me and I should get a coffee first to better understand this ?
Langhans_innen wrote on 16.02.2025 at 10:41 am: Moin,
maybe it's just me who is irritated by such a formulation, but in the course of a No Deposit AZ at betathome I just read the following message:" Note: Leave funds in your betting account until the end of the month, as withdrawals followed by deposits will count towards your deposit limit."
If it said: "Further deposits following a withdrawal will be added to your deposit limit", everything would be fine for me logically, but a withdrawal can never be added to a deposit limit, as it says in version 1 above. Or is BAH thinking sport on a Sunday morning not the right thing for me and I should get a coffee first to be able to categorize this better
I'd say BaH's wording is really just a bit unfavorable. Your version should be fine.
However, I find such a hint a bit borderline in terms of player protection. As we all know, money in an account is looser than money that still has to be deposited...😂
Would say is really just a bit awkwardly worded by BaH. Your version should be fine.
However, I find such a hint a bit borderline in terms of player protection. As we all know, money in an account is looser than money that still has to be deposited...😂
Well then, let's blame it on the crooked verbal acrobatics of our BAH colleagues. I've become rather over-sensitized to these limit stories since my Lugas blocked further depositors 2 months ago because I had supposedly reached the limit, even though I had only deposited €115. Nevertheless, I had withdrawals in December that amounted to around €1,000, which could lead to a block in the above context, although it would be completely crazy
As far as Player protection is concerned: I agree. It's a way of keeping people in line and avoiding "unnecessary payouts". However, I believe that this wording can now be found in this or a similar form in almost all German rogue shops
It is simply stupidly worded and means that the Deposit limit is not a loss limit. Payouts are therefore not offset against the limit.
More and more German bookies have this information, only better worded. In the whole context of Player protection blah blah blah, it's an absolute cheek, I agree with Triplehans.
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
zocker0815
Will never happen, at most with a Streamer and we know that something is wrong with them.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Absolutely right!!! Let them shove fake money or half fake money up their asses depending on the casino and contract 😂🙏🏻
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
The highest I've seen so far was 50€ bet. So a paltry 25 million max win. So it's not really worth it.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
I wouldn't play a €50 bet on this slot^^ I'd rather play slots that are less volatile
The 50€ spin is like a 200-500€ spin in another slot
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
maybe it's just me who is irritated by such a formulation, but in the course of a No Deposit AZ at betathome I just read the following message:" Note: Leave funds in your betting account until the end of the month, as withdrawals followed by deposits will count towards your deposit limit"
If it said: "Further deposits following a withdrawal will be added to your deposit limit", everything would be fine for me logically, but a withdrawal can never be added to a deposit limit, as it says in version 1 above. Or is BAH thinking sport on a Sunday morning not the right thing for me and I should get a coffee first to better understand this ?
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Langhans_innen
I'd say BaH's wording is really just a bit unfavorable. Your version should be fine.
However, I find such a hint a bit borderline in terms of player protection. As we all know, money in an account is looser than money that still has to be deposited...😂
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Hanshanshans
Well then, let's blame it on the crooked verbal acrobatics of our BAH colleagues. I've become rather over-sensitized to these limit stories since my Lugas blocked further depositors 2 months ago because I had supposedly reached the limit, even though I had only deposited €115. Nevertheless, I had withdrawals in December that amounted to around €1,000, which could lead to a block in the above context, although it would be completely crazy
As far as Player protection is concerned: I agree. It's a way of keeping people in line and avoiding "unnecessary payouts". However, I believe that this wording can now be found in this or a similar form in almost all German rogue shops
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
And what about withdrawals that are not followed by a depositor? Very incomprehensible the whole thing.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
i have now tried out exactly this case at BAH ....as usual, of course, they get nothing back
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Hanshanshans
More and more German bookies have this information, only better worded. In the whole context of Player protection blah blah blah, it's an absolute cheek, I agree with Triplehans.
This post has been translated automatically