You saw it with the VAT reduction, you saw it with the fuel price brake, if I remember correctly, that the savings are not or not completely passed on to the consumer...
For example, I would also be prepared to pay a surcharge for meat in order to improve animal husbandry and the treatment of animals in general. Ultimately, however, this surcharge would almost certainly end up in the pockets of the big meat producers. Just one example, doesn't really fit here😄
Anyway, in my opinion, standing up for the lowest income groups is always the right thing to do, unless you don't care about the ever-increasing inequality.
But it's getting too complex again and probably politically....
In any case, our DHL courier is mega 😄👍
I completely forgot about the fuel price brake, but yes, great example, which unfortunately shows that the end consumer will ultimately get very little from this well-intentioned reduction. I wonder why they want to do something like this again if it hasn't worked in the past.
Right, unfortunately in most cases this would not benefit the animals, but the manufacturers.
Langhans_innen wrote on 06.02.2025 at 09:35: My newspaper buddy is also on the bet from Mon-Sat. Regarding the rather harsh conditions that such a job entails, he said: "It's all a matter of getting used to the time. The cold isn't so bad either - but rain would make things pretty unpleasant. But like Jjepsa, he also emphasized that you just do your thing as your own boss and nobody gets on your nerves.
Everything is fine, it's just a lot of rain that sucks, you're soaking wet after 5 minutes and still have 8 hours to go
Important to read, it affects everyone who lives in Germany. https://archive.ph/20250206102120/https://www.cicero.de/wirtschaft/gesetz-zum-eu-emissionhandel-ets-ii-bundestag-beschliesst-drastische-co2-preiserhohung
Not things that move the world, but really frustrate me...
I've had a Samsung Galaxaý S24 ultra since the beginning of last year,
less than a year old. Samsung even gives a two-year warranty.
Two weeks ago I got the error message "water or foreign object" in the charging socket.
I can rule out the possibility of water or foreign bodies getting in there.
I cleaned it anyway and blew it dry with cold water.
The error message continued to appear, but the phone could at least still be charged inductively.
Now I had sent it in and it was sent to Poland by UPS.
After the phone arrived, I received a message that the display was damaged,
which was definitely not the case before shipping.
I chatted with a customer service employee, who told me
that an employee from the repair department would get in touch with me within 24 hours
and would talk to me about goodwill.
This did not happen. On Thursday, I checked the status online and to my delight
it said that the device had been repaired and was now being prepared for dispatch.
I was really pleased, a new display would have cost €309.
I received the following email shortly after 5pm yesterday:
Hello XXXXXXXX,
Your device will be returned to you unrepaired as per your request with the following shipping number.
We would like to make the Samsung Online Service Portal attractive and user-friendly for you as a customer and therefore hope for your help: Please let us know why you have decided not to complete the online order for the repair of your device. Please click here:
I thought I was in for a shock.
Almost at the same time, an employee from the repair department called, talked to me about the damage and said that he could not grant any goodwill. I then discussed it with him for 10 minutes, he also said that all parcels are checked for damage when they are received.
On Wednesday, I spoke to an employee of a stationary repair service,
he also confirmed that he had examined the phone carefully and that there was no damage to the display.
I have bought more than 20 Samsung devices in my life, but I consider this behavior to be
antisocial. Zero customer friendliness or responsiveness.
309€ is a lot of money, but it's also a matter of principle and I'm still p**sed off.
I had to vent my frustration here.
I'm going to order a few Samsung devices and make use of my 14-day right of return later.
bruffl wrote on 08.02.2025 at 08:39: Not things that move the world, but really frustrate me...
I've had a Samsung Galaxaý S24 ultra since the beginning of last year,
not even a year old. Samsung even gives a two-year warranty.
Two weeks ago I got the error message "water or foreign object" in the charging socket.
I can rule out the possibility of water or foreign bodies getting in there.
I cleaned it anyway and blew it dry with cold water.
The error message continued to appear, but the phone could at least still be charged inductively.
Now I had sent it in and it was sent to Poland by UPS.
After the phone arrived, I received a message that the display was damaged,
which was definitely not the case before shipping.
I chatted with a customer service employee, who told me
that an employee from the repair department would get in touch with me within 24 hours
and would talk to me about goodwill.
This did not happen. On Thursday, I checked the status online and to my delight
it said that the device had been repaired and was now being prepared for dispatch.
I was really pleased, a new display would have cost €309.
I received the following email shortly after 5pm yesterday:
Hello XXXXXXXX,
Your device will be returned to you unrepaired as per your request with the following shipping number.
We would like to make the Samsung Online Service Portal attractive and user-friendly for you as a customer and therefore hope for your help: Please let us know why you have decided not to complete the online order for the repair of your device. Please click here:
I thought I was in for a shock.
Almost at the same time, an employee from the repair department called, talked to me about the damage and said that he could not grant any goodwill. I then discussed it with him for 10 minutes, he also said that all parcels are checked for damage when they are received.
On Wednesday, I spoke to an employee of a stationary repair service,
he also confirmed that he had examined the phone carefully and that there was no damage to the display.
I have bought more than 20 Samsung devices in my life, but I consider this behavior to be
antisocial. Zero customer friendliness or responsiveness.
309€ is a lot of money, but it's also a matter of principle and I'm still p**sed off.
I had to vent my frustration here.
I'm going to order a few Samsung devices and make use of my 14-day right of return later.
That's why it's always best to have a witness or, even better, a video to clearly show the device being packed. The postal service doesn't even handle parcels with care within Germany - what's it like when they have to travel an even longer distance to Poland? Either way, I wouldn't let it sit on me.
You should explain to Samsung that there must have been damage in transit, as the device previously had a working display. Since they certainly didn't bring the package to Poland by hand, they can't guarantee that it wasn't damaged during shipping (e.g. dropped, thrown or stacked with other packages). For them, this is an Insurance claim with UPS. Either way, it can't be blamed on you - you should now receive an even more defective device than before? If necessary, threaten them with a lawyer - that usually helps. But I have the impression that they first test their limits out of laziness. Many are then put off, and they have less work.
bruffl wrote on 08.02.2025 at 08:39: Not things that move the world, but really frustrate me...
I've had a Samsung Galaxaý S24 ultra since the beginning of last year,
not even a year old. Samsung even gives a two-year warranty.
Two weeks ago I got the error message "water or foreign object" in the charging socket.
I can rule out the possibility of water or foreign bodies getting in there.
I cleaned it anyway and blew it dry with cold water.
The error message continued to appear, but the phone could at least still be charged inductively.
Now I had sent it in and it was sent to Poland by UPS.
After the phone arrived, I received a message that the display was damaged,
which was definitely not the case before shipping.
I chatted with a member of the customer service team, who told me
that an employee from the repair department would get in touch with me within 24 hours
and would talk to me about goodwill.
This did not happen. On Thursday, I checked the status online and to my delight
it said that the device had been repaired and was now being prepared for dispatch.
I was really pleased, a new display would have cost €309.
I received the following email shortly after 5pm yesterday:
Hello XXXXXXXX,
Your device will be returned to you unrepaired as per your request with the following shipping number.
We would like to make the Samsung Online Service Portal attractive and user-friendly for you as a customer and therefore hope for your help: Please let us know why you have decided not to complete the online order for the repair of your device. Please click here:
I thought I was in for a shock.
Almost at the same time, an employee from the repair department called, talked to me about the damage and said that he could not grant any goodwill. I then discussed it with him for 10 minutes, he also said that all parcels are checked for damage when they are received.
On Wednesday, I spoke to an employee of a stationary repair service,
he also confirmed that he had examined the phone carefully and that there was no damage to the display.
I have bought more than 20 Samsung devices in my life, but I consider this behavior to be
antisocial. Zero customer friendliness or responsiveness.
309€ is a lot of money, but it's also a matter of principle and I'm still p**sed off.
I had to vent my frustration here.
I'm going to order a few Samsung devices and make use of my 14-day right of return later.
That's annoying.
Since this is a case of testimony against testimony, the retailer has the burden of proof according to German law.
It's best to write another email and threaten them with a reference to § 357 BGB.
The retailer must prove to you that the cell phone was already damaged when you sent it.
The retailer also bears the Risk that the phone was damaged in transit,
if you did not act negligently (e.g. without packaging). However, the retailer must also prove this.
It is best to check the UPS tracking to see if there is any mention of damage.
Then you can clearly threaten with a lawyer, for example, and the outcome of the case would be 100% certain.
If there is no mention of damage in the tracking, it's still a case of testimony against testimony, which is an advantage for you.
Thank you for the answer.
Things like this are always frustrating.
You usually learn from your mistakes.
I was told in another forum,
that cell phones are often mixed up.
I will get my cell phone back on Monday,
i'm curious to see what awaits me.
I was also advised to simply file a complaint under StGb 303 (damage to property).
It's so pointless to get annoyed about things like this.
Since this is a case of testimony against testimony, the Dealer has the burden of proof according to German law.
It's best to write another email and threaten them with a reference to § 357 BGB.
The retailer must prove to you that the cell phone was already damaged when you sent it.
The retailer also bears the Risk that the phone was damaged in transit,
if you did not act negligently (e.g. without packaging). However, the retailer must also prove this.
It is best to check the UPS tracking to see if there is any mention of damage.
Then you can clearly threaten with a lawyer, for example, and the outcome of the case would be 100% certain.
If there is no mention of damage in the tracking, it's still a case of testimony against testimony, which is an advantage for you.
thank you for your answer.
According to UPS, there was no damage.
According to Samsung, all parcels are photographed on receipt,
any damage, this is recorded and checked accordingly
checked accordingly. I have several witnesses who could confirm that the cell phone or the display
was still in perfect condition, at least the day before.
Good, it went to Poland.
Who knows if someone looked inside the package......
The repair service employee couldn't even tell me where the display was damaged.
An indictment.
bruffl wrote on 08.02.2025 at 08:39: Not things that move the world, but really frustrate me...
I've had a Samsung Galaxaý S24 ultra since the beginning of last year,
not even a year old. Samsung even gives a two-year warranty.
Two weeks ago I got the error message "water or foreign object" in the charging socket.
I can rule out the possibility of water or foreign bodies getting in there.
I cleaned it anyway and blew it dry with cold water.
The error message continued to appear, but the phone could at least still be charged inductively.
Now I had sent it in and it was sent to Poland by UPS.
After the phone arrived, I received a message that the display was damaged,
which was definitely not the case before shipping.
I chatted with a member of the customer service team, who told me
that an employee from the repair department would get in touch with me within 24 hours
and would talk to me about goodwill.
This did not happen. On Thursday, I checked the status online and to my delight
it said that the device had been repaired and was now being prepared for dispatch.
I was really pleased, a new display would have cost €309.
I received the following email shortly after 5pm yesterday:
Hello XXXXXXXX,
Your device will be returned to you unrepaired as per your request with the following shipping number.
We would like to make the Samsung Online Service Portal attractive and user-friendly for you as a customer and therefore hope for your help: Please let us know why you have decided not to complete the online order for the repair of your device. Please click here:
I thought I was in for a shock.
Almost at the same time, an employee from the repair department called, talked to me about the damage and said that he could not grant any goodwill. I then discussed it with him for 10 minutes, he also said that all parcels are checked for damage when they are received.
On Wednesday, I spoke to an employee of a stationary repair service,
he also confirmed that he had examined the phone carefully and that there was no damage to the display.
I have bought more than 20 devices from Samsung in my life, but I consider this behavior to be
antisocial. Zero customer friendliness or responsiveness.
309€ is a lot of money, but it's also a matter of principle and I'm still p**sed off.
I had to vent my frustration here.
I'm going to order a few Samsung devices and make use of my 14-day right of return later.
Where did you buy the cell phone back then? Online or at the local electronics store?
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
I completely forgot about the fuel price brake, but yes, great example, which unfortunately shows that the end consumer will ultimately get very little from this well-intentioned reduction. I wonder why they want to do something like this again if it hasn't worked in the past.
Right, unfortunately in most cases this would not benefit the animals, but the manufacturers.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Langhans_innen
Everything is fine, it's just a lot of rain that sucks, you're soaking wet after 5 minutes and still have 8 hours to go
Well, complaining doesn't help ..
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
I've had a Samsung Galaxaý S24 ultra since the beginning of last year,
less than a year old. Samsung even gives a two-year warranty.
Two weeks ago I got the error message "water or foreign object" in the charging socket.
I can rule out the possibility of water or foreign bodies getting in there.
I cleaned it anyway and blew it dry with cold water.
The error message continued to appear, but the phone could at least still be charged inductively.
Now I had sent it in and it was sent to Poland by UPS.
After the phone arrived, I received a message that the display was damaged,
which was definitely not the case before shipping.
I chatted with a customer service employee, who told me
that an employee from the repair department would get in touch with me within 24 hours
and would talk to me about goodwill.
This did not happen. On Thursday, I checked the status online and to my delight
it said that the device had been repaired and was now being prepared for dispatch.
I was really pleased, a new display would have cost €309.
I received the following email shortly after 5pm yesterday:
I thought I was in for a shock.
Almost at the same time, an employee from the repair department called, talked to me about the damage and said that he could not grant any goodwill. I then discussed it with him for 10 minutes, he also said that all parcels are checked for damage when they are received.
On Wednesday, I spoke to an employee of a stationary repair service,
he also confirmed that he had examined the phone carefully and that there was no damage to the display.
I have bought more than 20 Samsung devices in my life, but I consider this behavior to be
antisocial. Zero customer friendliness or responsiveness.
309€ is a lot of money, but it's also a matter of principle and I'm still p**sed off.
I had to vent my frustration here.
I'm going to order a few Samsung devices and make use of my 14-day right of return later.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
bruffl,
RebellYell,
Saphira,
Tobsen
That's why it's always best to have a witness or, even better, a video to clearly show the device being packed. The postal service doesn't even handle parcels with care within Germany - what's it like when they have to travel an even longer distance to Poland? Either way, I wouldn't let it sit on me.
You should explain to Samsung that there must have been damage in transit, as the device previously had a working display. Since they certainly didn't bring the package to Poland by hand, they can't guarantee that it wasn't damaged during shipping (e.g. dropped, thrown or stacked with other packages). For them, this is an Insurance claim with UPS. Either way, it can't be blamed on you - you should now receive an even more defective device than before? If necessary, threaten them with a lawyer - that usually helps. But I have the impression that they first test their limits out of laziness. Many are then put off, and they have less work.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
bruffl,
Max_Bet,
RebellYell
That's annoying.
Since this is a case of testimony against testimony, the retailer has the burden of proof according to German law.
It's best to write another email and threaten them with a reference to § 357 BGB.
The retailer must prove to you that the cell phone was already damaged when you sent it.
The retailer also bears the Risk that the phone was damaged in transit,
if you did not act negligently (e.g. without packaging). However, the retailer must also prove this.
It is best to check the UPS tracking to see if there is any mention of damage.
Then you can clearly threaten with a lawyer, for example, and the outcome of the case would be 100% certain.
If there is no mention of damage in the tracking, it's still a case of testimony against testimony, which is an advantage for you.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Things like this are always frustrating.
You usually learn from your mistakes.
I was told in another forum,
that cell phones are often mixed up.
I will get my cell phone back on Monday,
i'm curious to see what awaits me.
I was also advised to simply file a complaint under StGb 303 (damage to property).
It's so pointless to get annoyed about things like this.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
thank you for your answer.
According to UPS, there was no damage.
According to Samsung, all parcels are photographed on receipt,
any damage, this is recorded and checked accordingly
checked accordingly. I have several witnesses who could confirm that the cell phone or the display
was still in perfect condition, at least the day before.
Good, it went to Poland.
Who knows if someone looked inside the package......
The repair service employee couldn't even tell me where the display was damaged.
An indictment.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Where did you buy the cell phone back then? Online or at the local electronics store?
This post has been translated automatically