Are you such a "we didn't find you because we didn't feel like ringing the doorbell even though the recipient is waiting for the package and could open the door immediately" deliverer or a proper one?
A regular mail and daily newspaper deliverer at night.
You don't earn a fortune, but it's enough to live on in a small town and I'm my own boss.
Aso ok, deliverer for me is -> DHL, Hermes, DPD. I don't think you can pay rent by delivering newspapers.
Parcel delivery is an important job that, like many others in society, is underpaid. But because of the underpayment, there are also a lot of people who simply don't work properly. I've had the most negative experiences with DHL, but that's different for everyone in every town.
Not necessarily. We have newspaper deliverers who even deliver mail - and that on a completely normal full-time salary.
My newspaper buddy is also on the bet from Mon-Sat. Regarding the rather harsh conditions that such a job entails, he said: "It's all a matter of getting used to the time. The cold isn't so bad either - but rain would make things pretty unpleasant. But like Jjepsa, he also emphasized that you just do your thing as your own boss and nobody gets on your nerves.
frapi07 wrote on 05.02.2025 at 21:02:
Doesn't help, as prices would also rise. You can see what has happened since there has been a minimum wage. Prices are being raised in order to be able to pay the wage increases. But you could have saved yourself the trouble, as this problem has been known for a long time (wage-price spiral).
The problem is that there will always be jobs that are poorly paid. The reason is simple: these jobs do not require high qualifications. The job may be physically demanding, but otherwise anyone can do it. Even if you can barely speak German. You also don't necessarily need a degree for the job.
What's more, there are still people who do this work for little money. If that weren't the case, we would make adjustments here too and increase pay - just like in the catering industry after the pandemic when they were short of staff.
You have to look at this in a more differentiated way. Since the usual wage-price spiral argument is often presented from the employer's point of view, here, for example, from the union's point of view:
Of course, it is not neutral either, but it shows that rising prices are only partly to do with wages, and that in recent years, in addition to energy etc., arbitrary price increases have been imposed by companies with strong market positions.
But there are certainly areas where rising wages must have a direct impact on prices.
For example, we have had wage increases of around 10% over the last two years, and this must clearly have an impact on our hourly wages, even if not in the region of these 10%.
So of course there will always be low-paid jobs, or in other words some jobs will always be the lowest paid, logically. But I do think that it would be possible to pay every full-time job enough to make a decent living.
You have to look at this in a more differentiated way. Since the usual wage - price spiral - argument is often brought to you from the employer's point of view, here, for example, from the union's point of view:
Of course, it is not neutral either, but it shows that rising prices are only partly to do with wages, and that in recent years, in addition to energy etc., arbitrary price increases have been imposed by companies with strong market positions.
But there are certainly areas where rising wages must have a direct impact on prices.
For example, we have had wage increases of around 10% over the last two years, and this must clearly have an impact on our hourly wages, even if not in the region of these 10%.
So of course there will always be low-paid jobs, or in other words some jobs will always be the lowest paid, logically. But I do think that it would be possible to pay every full-time job enough to make a decent living.
Yes, I read through the article and it's certainly not neutral. But it's clear that pay rises are only one of the factors, you're right of course.
I know the before/after energy costs, as I have a little insight into a catering business. Raw material prices have also risen, that's also true. Ham etc. I occasionally find out how much you paid before/after. If you used to spend €500 for 3 days at the Metro, today you spend €750-800. But ask yourself why food prices are also rising. Sure, energy prices are higher, but so are staff costs. In the last 4 years we have had a +-23% increase in the minimum wage (€10 - €12.80). Energy prices may also have seen an increase like this, but otherwise I can't remember a factor increasing so much in such a short space of time.
At the moment, it's simply not possible to make a decent living with a "low-paid job" because everyone is stuck on their margins and prices are being increased. The problem is that everyone is raising prices and you only get a salary. Some don't get pay rises, others do, but that's not enough to cover all the price rises (especially because the rises are always gross). The state can't even do anything about it. Some people (I won't mention any names) want to lower food prices by reducing VAT. What do you think will happen? The tax will initially be lowered, prices will fall for a short period, but manufacturers will then readjust and push the price up again so that they can recoup the difference as additional win. We had the temporary tax cut from 19% to 16%. At the time, this 3% only amounted to a few cents. But did that make a difference? No, it didn't.
Yes, I've read through the article and it's certainly not neutral. But it's clear that wage increases are only one of the factors, you're right of course.
I know the before/after energy costs as I have a little insight into a catering business. Raw material prices have also risen, that's also true. Ham etc. I occasionally find out how much you paid before/after. If you used to spend €500 for 3 days at the Metro, today you spend €750-800. But ask yourself why food prices are also rising. Sure, energy prices are higher, but so are staff costs. In the last 4 years we have had a +-23% increase in the minimum wage (€10 - €12.80). Energy prices may also have seen an increase like this, but otherwise I can't remember a factor increasing so much in such a short space of time.
At the moment, it's simply not possible to make a decent living with a "low-paid job" because everyone is stuck on their margins and prices are being increased. The problem is that everyone is raising prices and you only get a salary. Some don't get pay rises, others do, but that's not enough to cover all the price rises (especially because the rises are always gross). The state can't even do anything about it. Some people (I won't mention any names) want to lower food prices by reducing VAT. What do you think will happen? The tax will initially be lowered, prices will fall for a short period, but manufacturers will then readjust and push the price up again so that they can recoup the difference as additional win. We had the temporary tax cut from 19% to 16%. At the time, this 3% only amounted to a few cents. But did that make a difference? No, it didn't.
Yes, these are all important points...
You saw it with the VAT reduction, you saw it with the fuel price brake, if I remember correctly, that the savings are not or not fully passed on to the consumer...
For example, I would also be prepared to pay a surcharge for meat in order to improve animal husbandry and the treatment of animals in general. Ultimately, however, this surcharge would almost certainly end up in the pockets of the big meat producers. Just one example, doesn't really fit here😄
Anyway, in my opinion, standing up for the lowest income groups is always the right thing to do, unless you don't care about the ever-increasing inequality.
But it's getting too complex again and probably politically....
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Own brands have seen a higher percentage increase.
"Cheapflation": Why the prices of own brands have risen - SWR1 RP - SWR1 ("Own brands are becoming more expensive faster than branded products" )
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
garfield68,
Langhans_innen,
Saphira
A regular mail and daily newspaper deliverer at night.
You don't earn a fortune, but it's enough to live on in a small town and I'm my own boss.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
You always have to go to bed at the crack of dawn, just like the baker who has to start baking in the middle of the night
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
JJepsa96
Not necessarily. We have newspaper deliverers who even deliver mail - and that on a completely normal full-time salary.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Falko
I usually start shortly after or before midnight, which goes on until 07-08 o'clock, from Mon-Sat.
So sleeping during the day is not for everyone.
But I am a night person.
Just grab a quick coffee at the gas station ☕️.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
frapi07,
Patizi
You have to look at this in a more differentiated way. Since the usual wage-price spiral argument is often presented from the employer's point of view, here, for example, from the union's point of view:
https://www.dgb.de/politik/wirtschaft-und-transformation/wirtschaft-finanz-und-steuerpolitik/lohn-preis-spirale/
Of course, it is not neutral either, but it shows that rising prices are only partly to do with wages, and that in recent years, in addition to energy etc., arbitrary price increases have been imposed by companies with strong market positions.
But there are certainly areas where rising wages must have a direct impact on prices.
For example, we have had wage increases of around 10% over the last two years, and this must clearly have an impact on our hourly wages, even if not in the region of these 10%.
So of course there will always be low-paid jobs, or in other words some jobs will always be the lowest paid, logically. But I do think that it would be possible to pay every full-time job enough to make a decent living.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, I read through the article and it's certainly not neutral. But it's clear that pay rises are only one of the factors, you're right of course.
I know the before/after energy costs, as I have a little insight into a catering business. Raw material prices have also risen, that's also true. Ham etc. I occasionally find out how much you paid before/after. If you used to spend €500 for 3 days at the Metro, today you spend €750-800. But ask yourself why food prices are also rising. Sure, energy prices are higher, but so are staff costs. In the last 4 years we have had a +-23% increase in the minimum wage (€10 - €12.80). Energy prices may also have seen an increase like this, but otherwise I can't remember a factor increasing so much in such a short space of time.
At the moment, it's simply not possible to make a decent living with a "low-paid job" because everyone is stuck on their margins and prices are being increased. The problem is that everyone is raising prices and you only get a salary. Some don't get pay rises, others do, but that's not enough to cover all the price rises (especially because the rises are always gross). The state can't even do anything about it. Some people (I won't mention any names) want to lower food prices by reducing VAT. What do you think will happen? The tax will initially be lowered, prices will fall for a short period, but manufacturers will then readjust and push the price up again so that they can recoup the difference as additional win. We had the temporary tax cut from 19% to 16%. At the time, this 3% only amounted to a few cents. But did that make a difference? No, it didn't.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
frapi07
Yes, these are all important points...
You saw it with the VAT reduction, you saw it with the fuel price brake, if I remember correctly, that the savings are not or not fully passed on to the consumer...
For example, I would also be prepared to pay a surcharge for meat in order to improve animal husbandry and the treatment of animals in general. Ultimately, however, this surcharge would almost certainly end up in the pockets of the big meat producers. Just one example, doesn't really fit here😄
Anyway, in my opinion, standing up for the lowest income groups is always the right thing to do, unless you don't care about the ever-increasing inequality.
But it's getting too complex again and probably politically....
In any case, our DHL courier is mega 😄👍
This post has been translated automatically