Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 1351)

Topic created on 14th Jan. 2019 | Page: 1351 of 1351 | Answers: 13,504 | Views: 1,755,995
Patizi
Elite
R3hab wrote on 08.11.2024 at 16:00:

That you have an ugly character was clear to me and shows it again, just ugly your behavior and to be ashamed, go to the corner and be ashamed and laugh at yourself

Joker

So now would be the moment when you should just say that what you said was nonsense. You're standing there eating an apple and asking who the hell eats apples. It can only be satire

And you can take your personal attack and shove it. After all, your statement was simply nonsense. The fact that you then make a little haha and hihi about it is somehow understandable. However, I wasn't attacking you personally. You're probably a great guy and a role model for everyone! But that doesn't change the point!

This post has been translated automatically

Donnie
Elite
But he's right, I hardly ever watch public programs, it's usually just garbage or the hundredth repeat of Transporter or some pop show anyway. You're supposed to pay a penny for something you don't even use and at the same time the directors, presenters and artists make their pockets even fuller than they already are. This compulsory payment is a disgrace and actually violates the Basic Law. But I once read a table that Germany is the seventh most corrupt country, so nobody is going to attack each other or question all the machinations. Are the costs and the tax even justified? It's a joke what they earn with their garbage there

This post has been translated automatically

Crypto
Amateur
Donnie wrote on 08.11.2024 at 16:54: But he's right, I hardly ever watch public programs, it's usually just garbage or the hundredth repetition of Transporter or some pop show anyway. You're supposed to pay a penny for something you don't even use and at the same time the directors, presenters and artists are making their pockets even fuller than they already are. This compulsory payment is a disgrace and actually violates the Basic Law. But I once read a table that Germany is the seventh most corrupt country, so nobody is going to attack each other or question all the machinations. Are the costs and the tax even justified? It's a joke what they earn with their garbage there

So there is certainly corruption. But 7th place on a top list for Germany? Sounds like a reputable source.
Here is the Corruption Perceptions Index as an example. We are ranked 9th for 2022, but that is a good score in this table, not a negative one.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korruptionswahrnehmungsindex#2022

https://de.statista.com/infografik/24045/transparency-international-weltkarte-der-korruption/

https://www.transparency.de/cpi


R3hab wrote on 08.11.2024 at 15:58:


Anyway, it's also about the statements and the questions that the journalist asks Kai gniffke, and by ZDF and Co I mean the TV stations and not the media channels, you can see that some of them are quite ok. It's about the bosses being corrupt, pocketing money and now demanding to increase the contributions of the gez and having to close more stations because there's probably not enough money and the board members are lining their pockets
nobody watches these channels, everyone watches a streaming service today
The relationship between what they get in money is not right - everything needs to be rethought

Aren't the media channels currently also paid for by the GEZ fees? I don't know, but it would make sense to me since they are their productions. This is also stipulated in the Interstate Broadcasting Treaty that it is one of their tasks. The ÖRR also have the widest range of offerings, especially on the Internet.

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Elite
I find it funny how many double standards some users have and don't even realize it.

They really think they can lecture others, even though they don't behave any better.

Example: https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/sonstiges/smalltalk/plauderecke--60924/1289/#p413487 (post was written on September 09, 2024)

Here I am indirectly accused of lying because I have claimed that I currently have no time and no head for a mod job.

Of course, the user knows about my personal life and also knew that I was talking nonsense (irony off).

I once took the liberty of publishing part of a letter https://ibb.co/PDWrsd1 (will delete itself after a while).

In it you can see that 2 weeks earlier I had called for an ambulance (not because of me). The person was then also in intensive care for 5 days. Now an honest question: don't you feel a bit stupid and ashamed that you insinuated that I was lying, even though I had an unpleasant experience during this time and could have lost a family member?

By the way, this is not meant to be a personal attack on you, dear Rehab/Peter8, because unlike you, I am aware that you don't know my personal problems, but please don't insinuate that I am lying.

Actually, it's nobody's business, but I only published a small part to open your eyes to the fact that you are certainly not the type of person you like to believe. You also have unattractive character traits and as I said, I find it funny that you think you can judge the behavior of other users as if you were an innocent angel here.

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite

frapi07 wrote on 08.11.2024 at 17:25: I find it funny how many double standards some users have and don't even realize it.

They really think they can lecture others, even though they don't behave any better.

Example: https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/sonstiges/smalltalk/plauderecke--60924/1289/#p413487 (post was written on September 09, 2024)

Here I am indirectly accused of lying because I have claimed that I currently have no time and no head for a mod job.

Of course, the user knows about my personal life and also knew that I was talking nonsense (irony off).

I once took the liberty of publishing part of a letter https://ibb.co/PDWrsd1 (will delete itself after a while).

In it you can see that 2 weeks earlier I had called for an ambulance (not because of me). The person was then also in intensive care for 5 days. Now an honest question: don't you feel a bit stupid and ashamed that you insinuated that I was lying, even though I had an unpleasant experience during this time and could have lost a family member?

By the way, this is not meant to be a personal attack on you, dear Rehab/Peter8, because unlike you, I am aware that you don't know my personal problems, but please don't insinuate that I am lying.

Actually, it's nobody's business, but I only published a small part to open your eyes to the fact that you are certainly not the type of person you like to believe. You also have unattractive character traits and, as I said, I find it funny that you think you can judge the behavior of other users as if you were an innocent angel here.

Strong text!

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics8th Nov. 2024 at 06:50 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately