Saphira wrote on 23.09.2024 at 00:13: I'm not such an offer hunter. Always take what convinces me personally. For the teeth Microsilver Plus toothpaste or one with aloe vera. And the Oral B Plus Science or something similar because of the good Stiftung Warentest results. Even if you never know for sure whether the products are really that good. But in this case they really were. I now have three, which I use depending on my mood. At moderate prices. I would never buy 10 of the same shower gels because they're on offer, because I'm committing myself to a longer period of time without really wanting to. I think it's different for men. But to each his own. And yes, I know, this was about bargains and not about what I really like.
Now I've also bought the oral b science for 3.95 euros 💶
Stiftung Warentest very good. There must be something to it. It must be something good or
If you have problems that might improve, okay...
But normally it's difficult to judge that as a user, isn't it?
Nope, I think you can judge things like toothpaste and notice differences to other products. Taste, consistency, feeling of "cleanliness" - long-lasting or not, etc.
Nope, think so, you can also judge things like toothpaste and notice differences to other products. Taste, consistency, feeling of "cleanliness" - long-lasting or not, etc.
How do the ingredients differ? What, for example, is better in the Oral-B than in a toothpaste for 0.55 euros? What should the taste be like? What flavor does Oral-B have that is not cheap? What should the consistency be like and to what extent is the difference noticeable compared to a cheap one?
Great example regarding cleanliness. Charcoal toothpaste is advertised as very good, cleans the teeth really well and makes them whiter again. Stiftung Warntest confirms this by putting such crap in the top 10. Now ask your dentist. He will certainly not advise you to use this toothpaste, even if Stiftung Warentest rates it as "very good".
Patizi wrote on 24.09.2024 at 14:34:
How do the ingredients differ? What, for example, is better with the Oral-B than with a toothpaste for 0.55 euros? What should the taste be like? What flavor does Oral-B have that is not cheap? What should the consistency be like and to what extent is the difference noticeable compared to a cheap one?
Great example regarding cleanliness. Charcoal toothpaste is advertised as very good, cleans the teeth really well and makes them whiter again. Stiftung Warntest confirms it by putting such crap in the top 10. Now ask your dentist. He will certainly not advise you to use this toothpaste, even if Stiftung Warentest rates it as "very good".
How the taste "must" be is of course a matter of taste. As with everything, you either like the taste or not. I don't develop toothpaste, so I don't know directly what ingredients it contains. However, I can judge whether I like certain criteria apart from the ingredients. And if I like a product for 55 cents better than the one advertised by Stiftung Warentest, then I would also prefer the cheaper one. I don't shop according to Stiftung Warentest ratings. Nor did I claim that the cheaper products have a poorer consistency per se. I came across the Oral-B by chance and found that I liked it, which is why I felt it deserved the award in this case.
How the taste "has" to be is of course a matter of taste. As with everything that either tastes/pleases or not. I don't develop toothpaste, so I don't know directly what ingredients are in it. However, I can judge whether I like certain criteria apart from the ingredients. And if I like a product for 55 cents better than the one advertised by Stiftung Warentest, then I would also prefer the cheaper one. I don't shop according to Stiftung Warentest ratings. Nor did I claim that the cheaper products have a poorer consistency per se. I came across the Oral-B by chance and found that I liked it, which is why I felt it deserved the award in this case.
I would never use charcoal toothpaste in my life.
Of course, many things are a matter of taste. But many people are impressed by the price and the advertising. I bet, as with so many things, you could put a cheap toothpaste in the Oral-B and the Oral-B in the cheap one. Many people would take the Oral-B because it's Oral-B. Basically, there aren't really any clear reasons why you should go for the more expensive one apart from advertising and the feeling that "I'm spending more money so it must be better". Many people don't realize that the reason for the price is often simply the advertising and that they are also paying for it. In fact, this is exactly what is shabby. The toothpaste (just one example) is actually worth 1-2 euros, but because of the advertising it costs 4 euros and you are rewarding and supporting their aggressive advertising. I'm sure that if the cheaper brands also advertised so aggressively, they would sell differently, but then of course they would no longer be the cheapest. See Oral-B, for example
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Saphira
Now I've also bought the oral b science for 3.95 euros 💶
Stiftung Warentest very good. There must be something to it. It must be something good or
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
I'm curious to see if you're satisfied. Feel free to give feedback. I would be interested.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
You can write a product review, it's certainly very exciting.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
What can you say about it, apart from how it tastes? 😄
If you have problems that might improve, okay...
But normally it's difficult to judge as a user, isn't it?
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Nope, I think you can judge things like toothpaste and notice differences to other products. Taste, consistency, feeling of "cleanliness" - long-lasting or not, etc.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: gagapapamama, gamble1
No, I only do that if I get free products like at Rewe Produkttest.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
How do the ingredients differ? What, for example, is better in the Oral-B than in a toothpaste for 0.55 euros? What should the taste be like? What flavor does Oral-B have that is not cheap? What should the consistency be like and to what extent is the difference noticeable compared to a cheap one?
Great example regarding cleanliness. Charcoal toothpaste is advertised as very good, cleans the teeth really well and makes them whiter again. Stiftung Warntest confirms this by putting such crap in the top 10. Now ask your dentist. He will certainly not advise you to use this toothpaste, even if Stiftung Warentest rates it as "very good".
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
the explorers have managed to regrow teeth, thanks to crisper. what devils!!!
i wonder what else is coming with these scissors? for a better world
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
How the taste "must" be is of course a matter of taste. As with everything, you either like the taste or not. I don't develop toothpaste, so I don't know directly what ingredients it contains. However, I can judge whether I like certain criteria apart from the ingredients. And if I like a product for 55 cents better than the one advertised by Stiftung Warentest, then I would also prefer the cheaper one. I don't shop according to Stiftung Warentest ratings. Nor did I claim that the cheaper products have a poorer consistency per se. I came across the Oral-B by chance and found that I liked it, which is why I felt it deserved the award in this case.
I would never use charcoal toothpaste in my life.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: garfield68, Saphira
Of course, many things are a matter of taste. But many people are impressed by the price and the advertising. I bet, as with so many things, you could put a cheap toothpaste in the Oral-B and the Oral-B in the cheap one. Many people would take the Oral-B because it's Oral-B. Basically, there aren't really any clear reasons why you should go for the more expensive one apart from advertising and the feeling that "I'm spending more money so it must be better". Many people don't realize that the reason for the price is often simply the advertising and that they are also paying for it. In fact, this is exactly what is shabby. The toothpaste (just one example) is actually worth 1-2 euros, but because of the advertising it costs 4 euros and you are rewarding and supporting their aggressive advertising. I'm sure that if the cheaper brands also advertised so aggressively, they would sell differently, but then of course they would no longer be the cheapest. See Oral-B, for example
I just wanted to put this out there in general.
This post has been translated automatically