Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 1318)

Topic created on 14th Jan. 2019 | Page: 1318 of 1320 | Answers: 13,191 | Views: 1,697,373
Olli_Eule
Elite

Saphira wrote on 23.09.2024 at 00:13: I'm not such an offer hunter. Always take what convinces me personally. For the teeth Microsilver Plus toothpaste or one with aloe vera. And the Oral B Plus Science or something similar because of the good Stiftung Warentest results. Even if you never know for sure whether the products are really that good. But in this case they really were. I now have three, which I use depending on my mood. At moderate prices. I would never buy 10 of the same shower gels because they're on offer, because I'm committing myself to a longer period of time without really wanting to. I think it's different for men. But to each his own. And yes, I know, this was about bargains and not about what I really like.

Now I've also bought the oral b science for 3.95 euros 💶


Stiftung Warentest very good. There must be something to it. It must be something good or

This post has been translated automatically

Saphira
Expert

Olli_Eule wrote on 24.09.2024 at 11:04 am:

Now I have also bought the oral b science for 3.95 euros 💶


Stiftung Warentest very good. There must be something to it. It must be something good or

I'm curious to see if you're satisfied. Feel free to give feedback. I would be interested.

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend

Olli_Eule wrote on 24.09.2024 at 11:04 am:

Now I have also bought the oral b science for 3.95 euros 💶


Stiftung Warentest very good. There must be something to it. It must be something good or

You can write a product review, it's certainly very exciting.

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend

Saphira wrote on September 24th, 2024 at 12:58 pm:

I'm curious to see if you're satisfied. Feel free to give feedback. I would be interested.

What can you say about it, apart from how it tastes? 😄

If you have problems that might improve, okay...
But normally it's difficult to judge as a user, isn't it?

This post has been translated automatically

Saphira
Expert

Stromberg wrote on 24.09.2024 at 13:20:

What can you say except how it tastes? 😄

If you have problems that might improve, okay...
But normally it's difficult to judge that as a user, isn't it?

Nope, I think you can judge things like toothpaste and notice differences to other products. Taste, consistency, feeling of "cleanliness" - long-lasting or not, etc.

This post has been translated automatically

Olli_Eule
Elite

upola wrote on 24.09.2024 at 13:04:

You can write a product recession, I'm sure it's super exciting.

No, I only do that if I get free products like at Rewe Produkttest.




This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite
Saphira wrote on 24.09.2024 at 13:23:

Nope, think so, you can also judge things like toothpaste and notice differences to other products. Taste, consistency, feeling of "cleanliness" - long-lasting or not, etc.

How do the ingredients differ? What, for example, is better in the Oral-B than in a toothpaste for 0.55 euros? What should the taste be like? What flavor does Oral-B have that is not cheap? What should the consistency be like and to what extent is the difference noticeable compared to a cheap one?


Great example regarding cleanliness. Charcoal toothpaste is advertised as very good, cleans the teeth really well and makes them whiter again. Stiftung Warntest confirms this by putting such crap in the top 10. Now ask your dentist. He will certainly not advise you to use this toothpaste, even if Stiftung Warentest rates it as "very good".

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL
Expert

Olli_Eule wrote on 24.09.2024 at 11:04 am:

Now I have also bought the oral b science for 3.95 euros 💶


Stiftung Warentest very good. There must be something to it. It must be something good or

the explorers have managed to regrow teeth, thanks to crisper. what devils!!!


i wonder what else is coming with these scissors? for a better world

This post has been translated automatically

Saphira
Expert

Patizi wrote on 24.09.2024 at 14:34:
How do the ingredients differ? What, for example, is better with the Oral-B than with a toothpaste for 0.55 euros? What should the taste be like? What flavor does Oral-B have that is not cheap? What should the consistency be like and to what extent is the difference noticeable compared to a cheap one?


Great example regarding cleanliness. Charcoal toothpaste is advertised as very good, cleans the teeth really well and makes them whiter again. Stiftung Warntest confirms it by putting such crap in the top 10. Now ask your dentist. He will certainly not advise you to use this toothpaste, even if Stiftung Warentest rates it as "very good".

How the taste "must" be is of course a matter of taste. As with everything, you either like the taste or not. I don't develop toothpaste, so I don't know directly what ingredients it contains. However, I can judge whether I like certain criteria apart from the ingredients. And if I like a product for 55 cents better than the one advertised by Stiftung Warentest, then I would also prefer the cheaper one. I don't shop according to Stiftung Warentest ratings. Nor did I claim that the cheaper products have a poorer consistency per se. I came across the Oral-B by chance and found that I liked it, which is why I felt it deserved the award in this case.


I would never use charcoal toothpaste in my life.

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite

Saphira wrote on 24.09.2024 at 15:18:

How the taste "has" to be is of course a matter of taste. As with everything that either tastes/pleases or not. I don't develop toothpaste, so I don't know directly what ingredients are in it. However, I can judge whether I like certain criteria apart from the ingredients. And if I like a product for 55 cents better than the one advertised by Stiftung Warentest, then I would also prefer the cheaper one. I don't shop according to Stiftung Warentest ratings. Nor did I claim that the cheaper products have a poorer consistency per se. I came across the Oral-B by chance and found that I liked it, which is why I felt it deserved the award in this case.


I would never use charcoal toothpaste in my life.


Of course, many things are a matter of taste. But many people are impressed by the price and the advertising. I bet, as with so many things, you could put a cheap toothpaste in the Oral-B and the Oral-B in the cheap one. Many people would take the Oral-B because it's Oral-B. Basically, there aren't really any clear reasons why you should go for the more expensive one apart from advertising and the feeling that "I'm spending more money so it must be better". Many people don't realize that the reason for the price is often simply the advertising and that they are also paying for it. In fact, this is exactly what is shabby. The toothpaste (just one example) is actually worth 1-2 euros, but because of the advertising it costs 4 euros and you are rewarding and supporting their aggressive advertising. I'm sure that if the cheaper brands also advertised so aggressively, they would sell differently, but then of course they would no longer be the cheapest. See Oral-B, for example


I just wanted to put this out there in general.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics27th Sep. 2024 at 05:32 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately