Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 1292)

Topic created on 14th Jan. 2019 | Page: 1292 of 1309 | Answers: 13,086 | Views: 1,679,440
Patizi
Elite

Dutch78 wrote on 09.09.2024 at 18:49: Completely detached from the proportionality or disproportionality of the blocking of the two, it is simply not appropriate to then verbally point out the misconduct of the users again and again. The two can no longer express themselves here and a discussion consists of at least two parties, so the whole thing here is too one-sided for me.

I'm not talking about the users who are against a ban, that still keeps the discussion very balanced, if so then only those directly involved can express themselves here and that would be Julian and Patizi on one side and the other two on the other, but that's no longer possible. Of course you can discuss the decision itself, but you should completely leave out the negative comments about the two of them.

Even though I can understand Patizi's attempt to explain himself and the reasons he believes led to the ban, I don't understand why you repeat this ten times.
I think the inclined reader already understood it the first time, the other times led to confusion for me, because I got the impression that you couldn't understand some of the arguments of the other side and therefore wrote the same thing over and over again.

Personally, I think it's a shame that two points of friction have been removed, but again, I'm not concerned with the question of right/wrong, that's for others to judge.
Blubbo in particular was always very "vocal" in the forum and was certainly the basis for one or two discussions that would never have taken place without him.

Such characters may not reflect the "norm", but only normal is boring in the long run.
Such characters liven up the forum, it's the controversy that makes it exciting.
It's not just their contributions that will be missing, but also what would have developed from them.

You can have whatever opinion you like about them and if you ignore all the surrounding issues and forget all personal feelings for a moment, then they were not an insignificant part of GambleJoe.

Anyway, I wish Blubbo and x00NY, if they are reading this, all the best for the future.





Why do I keep repeating this? Please read all the comments and then you'll understand. There are one or two people here, even though I've repeated it umpteen times, who are stuck on last night. That's why I'm repeating it and will continue to do so until everyone understands that the hammer fell yesterday but that it had been coming for a long time. If I was only judging the situation yesterday then I would also say "Oh, because of that one thing yesterday?" but it's not just because of yesterday. And everyone should just understand that, that's all.


I'm not going to throw out any names here, but I can promise you that there are members here who have not commented or have reconsidered 3 times specifically because of a Blubbo. Some of them are relieved that he is no longer here, believe me. And I don't mean that in a bad way, it's just a fact.

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite

upola wrote on 09.09.2024 at 18:56:

I think I'm the third person you've told this to.

Nice that you know everything, you are a real checker.

Ok, that's exactly it. What do you know? Why my outcry? Why is Julian acting like this?


Why don't you answer what happened yesterday, before this happened? Or what happened a few days before.

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite
Does anyone actually watch Baller League?

This post has been translated automatically

Julian
Elite
Patizi wrote on 09.09.2024 at 19:02:

Ok, that's exactly it. What do you know? Why my outcry? Why is Julian acting like this?


Why don't you answer what happened yesterday, before this happened? Or what happened a few days before.

I completely agree with Dutch78, everyone who was active here yesterday probably saw everything for themselves and made up their own mind about the situation. At the moment, the arguments seem to be going round and round.

Many people have already expressed their opinion on the subject and that's perfectly fine.
However, I don't think it's necessary to impose your own opinion on anyone or to continue discussing it in a cramped manner. Which is not to say that I want to put the topic or the discussion on ice.
But I also feel very uncomfortable with the fact that Blubbo and x00NY are constantly being discussed here, even though they don't really have the opportunity to comment on possible accusations.

I would therefore at best ask that the individual behavior of the members, or in an even better case the people themselves, not be discussed further here, as it could really be very provocative, and that is not the purpose of the whole thing.

However, if you have any general questions about how I handled it yesterday, or any other questions or food for thought in general, please feel free to ask further questions or leave criticism. As I said, I'm just not interested in continuing to discuss them here in their absence. I hope for your understanding.

This post has been translated automatically

Falke
Expert

Dutch78 wrote on 09.09.2024 at 18:49: Completely detached from the proportionality or disproportionality of the blocking of the two, it is simply not appropriate to then verbally point out the misconduct of the users again and again. The two can no longer express themselves here and a discussion consists of at least two parties, so the whole thing here is too one-sided for me.

I'm not talking about the users who are against a ban, that still keeps the discussion very balanced, if so then only those directly involved can express themselves here and that would be Julian and Patizi on one side and the other two on the other, but that's no longer possible. Of course you can discuss the decision itself, but you should completely leave out the negative comments about the two of them.

Even though I can understand Patizi's attempt to explain himself and the reasons he believes led to the ban, I don't understand why you repeat this ten times.
I think the inclined reader already understood it the first time, the other times led to confusion for me, because I got the impression that you couldn't understand some of the other side's arguments and therefore wrote the same thing over and over again.

Personally, I think it's a shame that two points of friction have been removed, but again, I'm not concerned with the question of right/wrong, that's for others to judge.
Blubbo in particular was always very "vocal" in the forum and was certainly the basis for one or two discussions that would never have taken place without him.

Such characters may not reflect the "norm", but only normal is boring in the long run.
Such characters liven up the forum, it's the controversy that makes it exciting.
It's not just their contributions that will be missing, but also what would have developed from them.

You can have whatever opinion you like about them and if you ignore all the surrounding issues and forget all personal feelings for a moment, then they were not an insignificant part of GambleJoe.

Anyway, I wish Blubbo and x00NY, if they are reading this, all the best for the future.





Very well put. And that's exactly how I see it. The two of them mean the loss of two interesting users who have enlivened the forum.


I mean, the topics here at GJ repeat themselves over and over again. That's not meant to be an accusation, but it's in the nature of things that the topics in a gamer forum are repetitive. Accordingly, it can get boring from time to time. And that's where Blubbo in particular has repeatedly caused controversy, which has made the forum more exciting.

I also never had the impression that he was overstepping the mark. He was certainly provocative, but he never crossed a certain line. At least not a limit that would justify a ban.

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert
Owl, how are things on the coast? Stiff breeze? Hotel deal worked out? Are you tanned yet? Cell phone off at night? You're online right now and maybe you can share a bit with the community...It's so quiet without you in the evening in the sports section

This post has been translated automatically

Olli_Eule
Elite
Langhans_innen wrote on 09.09.2024 at 22:12: Owl, how are things on the coast? Stiff breeze? Hotel deal worked out? Are you tanned yet? Cell phone off at night? You're online right now and maybe you can share a bit with the community...it's so quiet without you in the evening in the sports department

I've canceled the hotel room and rebooked. Now I've saved 16.50 euros.


But also a Twin room now. Before it was a double bed. That's 2 advantages, it's worth it, everything is automatic now and you don't have to call the hotel like you used to.

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert

Olli_Eule wrote on 09.09.2024 at 22:45:
I canceled the hotel room and rebooked. Now I have saved 16.50 euros.


But also a Twin room now. Before it was a double bed. That's 2 advantages, it's worth it, everything is automatic now and you don't have to call the hotel like you used to.

Great, then the trickery has gone smoothly I would definitely be pleased if you could give me another report on the situation this week. Then continue to have a good and sport-free recovery

This post has been translated automatically

Maggi89
Rookie
Evening I do not know exactly where it belongs therefore briefly to the thing. I have played at GG54 for years... without problems today or yesterday I played at evoplay Juice gems then came into the bonus with 5 coins and it went on suddenly in the bonus this report here

Illegal game action roundState: finis_pending request id...

Support contacted takes care. But maybe someone had the problem too? Mfg

This post has been translated automatically

Olli_Eule
Elite

Langhans_innen wrote on 09.09.2024 at 23:10:

Great, then the trickery has already worked smoothly I would definitely be happy if there would be another situation report from you this week. Then continue to have a good and sport-free recovery

Thanks Yesterday evening I went for a 4.8 kilometer walk.


I didn't watch anything because of sports betting.
But I also knew that I was iron-willed and wouldn't bet on vacation again.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics19th Sep. 2024 at 03:13 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately