-
TennisFreak, on 14th Sep. 2024 at 07:52 pm CEST
-
Butterbrezel, on 11th Sep. 2024 at 07:46 pm CEST
-
Falke, today at 02:57 am CEST
-
Olli_Eule, today at 12:57 am CEST
-
Malganes, yesterday at 10:26 pm CEST
-
R3hab, yesterday at 07:08 pm CEST
-
frapi07, yesterday at 05:14 pm CEST
-
Memoak447, yesterday at 02:44 pm CEST
-
danny005, yesterday at 02:30 pm CEST
-
Pepi31, yesterday at 01:47 pm CEST
-
__Everhard__, yesterday at 01:06 pm CEST
-
moralischverwerflich, yesterday at 11:51 am CEST
-
Malganes, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 10:58 pm CEST
-
MisterL, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 08:52 pm CEST
-
MisterL, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 08:49 pm CEST
-
playermarv00, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 07:26 pm CEST
-
Max_Bet, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 05:56 pm CEST
-
BZASCH1, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 01:53 pm CEST
-
Donnie, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 12:27 pm CEST
-
Paddington, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 08:18 am CEST
-
JonasBrrt, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 07:08 am CEST
-
Donnie, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 12:47 am CEST
-
Tomeklies15987, on 17th Sep. 2024 at 12:33 am CEST
-
Malganes, on 16th Sep. 2024 at 11:28 pm CEST
-
RebellYell, on 16th Sep. 2024 at 06:27 pm CEST
-
moralischverwerflich, on 16th Sep. 2024 at 05:29 pm CEST
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
- Verification required
- Monthly membership fee of 10,00€ due
- no participation in lotteries allowed
I would be very interested to know how many people would still be interested?
Then the whole "theater" would be dissolved in no time....
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Probably the right decision, but it's still a shame that you have to keep your opinions to yourselves in situations such as the user ban.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: slotliebe89
There is no muzzle here. But I also don't think that I, as a private fan, would have interfered too much during the hot phase...I can't remember exactly who threw what at whom - there was just too much action for that. But at least I personally wasn't offended and I don't have to get involved in every explosive clique. But that's not new since last week and I'll keep it that way
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Malganes, Olli_Eule
I think the thing with the mods is considered too big. They don't really have any additional functions and they're not allowed to make decisions on their own. I have the feeling that others just see it as incredibly big, bigger than the mods themselves. Why should a mod also comment on the topic yesterday? I agree with Hans, it would only have added more fuel to the fire. I think it's rather strong that the mods stayed out of it and didn't cause any more trouble. Maybe even a sign that it was the right thing to do regarding the mods
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Donnie, upola
In this case, you spat in their face just like that, to use your own language. You made a very provocative post and then continued to provoke in the other thread. And a good moderator would have admonished both of them in this case or simply let them let off steam as long as no boundaries were crossed.
But now you are presenting yourself as an innocent lamb as if you had no part in the whole thing and, as someone else has already mentioned here, that comes across as very unsympathetic.
I have no problem at all with the fact that you counter them and that you're happy to do so a little more harshly. But the fact that you're screaming for consequences and inciting Julian to ban them is more than just borderline. So you played your part in escalating the situation. And then you even added to it after the ban. I much prefer Blubbo, with whom I've often clashed myself.
So your behavior was absolutely out of line and certainly not in the spirit of a good community. But you won't be banned. Can you tell the difference? You can continue to spout off and even attack the defenceless after the fact. You called for a ban and your wish was granted. Does that make you a happier person now?
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Donnie, Langhans_innen, Patizi
Yes, far too big... 😄It doesn't really matter. It's good to express your concerns about it once, if you have any. You might also bring up points that others might not have had on their radar.
It's kind of absurd that something like this is coming out now.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
I don't even want to know how many times Julian or Andre have wanted to throw me off the cliff, i.e. wanted to ban me. I think it's stupid that they've been banned now, even if it was partly justified. Just ignore the guys and the problem would have gone away by itself
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
If two or even three people go off on you, then it's more difficult to ignore the whole thing. But that doesn't really matter. Patizi has explained it several times: the ban is the result of years of provocation directed at various users. He is not to blame for this, but the two themselves are responsible for their bans, because they behaved in this way. They were not forced to always provoke. Patizi has also always given in. Even yesterday he had his post deleted with Julian's consent. The two were not so cooperative yesterday. As Julian himself writes, one ignored him coldly and the other danced around on his nose (wrote to him privately to stop the provocations, but then continued straight away). As a mod, you can't skillfully ignore something like that - that would be a fatal mistake.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
How do you know that I didn't get a warning?
Tell me what happened before, if you're so involved. Why did I say that something had to happen there? Can you answer that or do you lack the knowledge?
And at the end you talk again about "but you won't be banned"! You're comparing me to them. I never had a temp ban or umpteen warnings. Why should I be banned? Whether I have already attracted negative attention for you is not relevant in this case because you are not the measure. The measure in this case is GJ and the two of them have been noticed incredibly often. I repeat myself. They both had a temp. ban. I didn't. They had the preliminary stage to the Perm. Ban. But now please answer my questions and don't ignore them. To what extent do you know what happened to judge all this. Faded out yesterday in the process.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Donnie, R3hab, Rainmann, zocker0815
This post has been translated automatically