Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 1289)

Topic created on 14th Jan. 2019 | Page: 1289 of 1309 | Answers: 13,086 | Views: 1,679,465
Donnie
Expert

Chatterbox

9th Sep. 2024, at 10:14 am CEST#12995
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

upola wrote on 09.09.2024 at 10:08: Everyone is equal, only some are more equal.

A few days ago a post of mine was deleted, although it contained neither an insult nor a provocation, it was just the truth. Apparently, however, some users didn't like the post

What did you write?

This post has been translated automatically

Julian
Elite

Chatterbox

9th Sep. 2024, at 10:23 am CEST#12996
2 Likes

Liked this post: Avatar von Donnie Donnie, Avatar von Patizi Patizi
Donnie wrote on 09.09.2024 at 10:14 am:

What did you write?

I can answer for him and explain the situation:

A newbie had created a thread and expressed a problem and Upola had replied to it and this post was subsequently reported by the community.
""Has no money for a lawyer, he's just a poor pensioner. The money is just enough for regular gambling.""

I classified this post as a provocation and deleted it. I agreed with the message, so to speak.
But in the same breath I also informed him via Communicator why and why the post was deleted.

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend

Chatterbox

9th Sep. 2024, at 12:42 pm CEST#12997
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Julian wrote on 09.09.2024 at 10:14 am:

Do you mean the post from 08/22?

As far as I know, I have already contacted you via Communicator to explain this to you.

That's why I can still tell you here, especially since I didn't agree with it,

This post has been translated automatically

R3hab
Elite

Chatterbox

9th Sep. 2024, at 02:17 pm CEST#12998
3 Likes

Liked this post: Avatar von Falke Falke, Avatar von gagapapamama gagapapamama, Avatar von Nik89 Nik89
Honestly, patzi and frapi you both are mega unsympathetic, patizi where I was in a group with you, I noticed that, you feel here as if you are the top macker with a plan, you should be banned and frapi always makes a gj employee here who has no idea about anything but pretends to know everything, you are just embarrassing, you should be banned just like that, you have provoked me often enough and Babelst only garbage, thought you have little time? You can see how little time you have 🤣🤣

Julian banning the guys because of that is really mega shit, had my problems with both of them but would never have demanded that they be banned like patizi

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite

Chatterbox

9th Sep. 2024, at 02:33 pm CEST#12999
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
R3hab wrote on 09.09.2024 at 14:17: Honestly, patzi and frapi you both are mega unsympathetic, patizi where I was in a group with you, I noticed that, you feel here as if you are the top macker with a plan, you think you should be banned and frapi always makes a gj employee here who has no idea about anything but pretends to know everything, you are just embarrassing, you should be banned just like that, you have provoked me often enough and only babelst garbage, thought you have little time? You can see how little time you have 🤣🤣

Julian banning the guys because of that is really mega shit, had my problems with both of them too but would never have demanded that they be banned, like patizi



You don't seem to understand it either, do you? The two were already so far gone that they had a temp. ban in the past. So it was the highest preliminary stage to a direct ban. Plus a few admonishments. It's not just about yesterday. So much had already happened before yesterday. But we can look at how many warnings I've had in 6 years and how many of them. I think there was one serious warning a few years ago, that was it. I haven't had a temp. ban yet either. It is absolutely disproportionate if I would be banned. Please judge the whole time and not just one thing. I could also show you chat histories where I was repeatedly banned. It was clear that I would burst at some point after being approached, I don't know, 5-10 times. Do you even know what triggered me yesterday? The way you write, I think I do. I'm curious to see what you think.

You know about the group yourself, you hardly participated at all. And you're angry with me because I said so. More participation = no discussion about it. It worked for the others too. Incidentally, it wasn't just me at the time.

By the way, your last sentence shows that you really didn't understand. But I'm happy to repeat myself, the ban isn't specifically because of yesterday. Of course the barrel overflowed yesterday, but it was a series of misconduct that led to it.

This post has been translated automatically

slotliebe89
Elite

Chatterbox

9th Sep. 2024, at 02:43 pm CEST#13000
1 Like

Liked this post: Avatar von gagapapamama gagapapamama
I would never have thought it possible that the decision with the 4 moderators would have such consequences.
However, all of them (I'll leave Andre out of this) have stayed out of this discussion so far, which might not have been the case if they were still "normal" members. Therefore, the objection raised by Falke, Blubbo etc. is apparently not completely unfounded after all.

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite

Chatterbox

9th Sep. 2024, at 02:46 pm CEST#13001
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

slotliebe89 wrote on 09.09.2024 at 14:43: I would never have thought it possible that the decision with the 4 moderators would have such consequences.
However, everyone (I'll leave Andre out of this) has stayed out of this discussion so far, which might not have been the case if they were still "normal" members. Therefore, the objection raised by Falke, Blubbo etc. is apparently not completely out of thin air after all.

What were they supposed to say? And if I'm not mistaken, they even wrote something about it at the beginning

This post has been translated automatically

slotliebe89
Elite

Chatterbox

9th Sep. 2024, at 02:49 pm CEST#13002
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Patizi wrote on 09.09.2024 at 14:46:

What should they have said? And if I'm not mistaken, they even wrote something about it at the beginning

They certainly have an opinion on what happened yesterday and I'm convinced that they would have expressed their opinion if they weren't mods. But I could be wrong.

This post has been translated automatically

Donnie
Expert

Chatterbox

9th Sep. 2024, at 02:51 pm CEST#13003
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Maybe you should change the moderators after 1,2 months and let others who want to do it. Open a thread beforehand where everyone can post their interest. Just a thought. How many would want to do it anyway? 10,20,30,40? It would be interesting to know

That way, everyone who wants to play moderator would get something out of it

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert

Chatterbox

9th Sep. 2024, at 02:58 pm CEST#13004
3 Likes

Liked this post: Avatar von frapi07 frapi07, Avatar von gamble1 gamble1, Avatar von Saphira Saphira
slotliebe89 wrote on 09.09.2024 at 14:43: I would never have thought it possible that the decision with the 4 moderators would have such consequences.
However, everyone (I'll leave Andre out of this) has stayed out of this discussion so far, which might not have been the case if they were still "normal" members. Therefore, the objection raised by Falke, Blubbo etc. is apparently not completely out of thin air after all.

I would never have thought that possible. For us "assistant re-moderators", there was no immediate reason to interfere at the moment when members complained to the company management about the procedure/selection etc. At least I didn't see any. At least I didn't see any, which was also intended to de-escalate the situation. The fact that the situation gradually got more and more out of hand is of course extremely regrettable, but it happened even though we stayed out of it. I'm no clairvoyant, but I suspect it would have gotten a lot rougher if we, as newcomers, had been involved. The start was supposed to be calm and peaceful for everyone and even if that wasn't necessarily to be expected, adding fuel to the fire probably wouldn't have been a good idea.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics19th Sep. 2024 at 03:21 am CEST

Bonus
0
Bonus
0
Watch-out
0
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately