1 my 1 post was feedback because of what happened, and has happened before. No one was mentioned there or anything.
2 your posts read 100% as if sb claimed something like that, you don't need to come in and be a judge, simple as that.
Donnie wrote to her, not me. Apparently you need a wake up call because you still don't look at things in context, just want to play smart ass, puff yourself up and be annoying, no more of you, gotta have breakfast.
A look at hustlehoff's profile shows that he wasn't online every day in the past (or at least didn't post every day). So I would wait and see if hustlehoff comments on this today.
The fact that a regular user is being ripped off for 50.00 EUR just doesn't make sense to me. Maybe it was an explainable misunderstanding.
Butterbrezel wrote on 04.08.2024 at 09:14: A look at hustlehoff's profile shows that he was not online every day in the past (or at least did not write a post every day). So I would wait and see if hustlehoff comments on this today.
The fact that a regular user is being ripped off for 50.00 EUR just doesn't make sense to me. Maybe it was an explainable misunderstanding.
I saw the progress and it really is as TennisFreak writes. He always replied to her quickly and even confirmed that the money had arrived.
R3hab wrote on 04.08.2024 at 09:06: What do I have? I think it's hacking
1 my 1 post was feedback because of what happened, and has happened before. No one was mentioned or anything there.
2 your posts read 100% as if sb claimed something like that, you don't need to come in and be a judge, simple as that.
Donnie wrote to her, not me. Apparently you need a wake up call because you still don't look at things in context, you just want to play smart ass, puff yourself up and be annoying, now end with you, no need to have breakfast.
My post was generally not directed at you, but at X00NY. He wrote what I was going to do with the evidence. Ban him or warn him? I explained to him there that I wanted to draw a conclusion for myself. I need evidence for that. That's logical in itself, don't you think? I always write from my own perspective, I never mentioned that others call him a scammer without proof. I don't care how others do it. I've written that to you before. Is it really that difficult to understand?
I'm not blowing my top, you're accusing me of things I never wrote.
I have seen the progress and it really is as TennisFreak writes it. He always replied to her quickly and even confirmed that the money had arrived.
Does it also appear from the screenshots that he initiated the agreed PayPal payment?
Is there perhaps a spelling mistake in the e-mail address so that the payment has not arrived?
Of course, it could be that he simply ripped you off. But as long as misunderstandings are still possible, the process is not yet clearly settled for me.
I can imagine that I'm very much alone with this "I believe in the GUTS of gamblers" attitude. But that's just the way it is
Does it also appear from the screenshots that he has initiated the agreed PayPal payment?
Is there perhaps a spelling mistake in the email address so that the payment has not arrived?
Of course, it could be that he simply ripped you off. But as long as misunderstandings are still possible, the process is not yet clearly settled for me.
I can imagine that I'm very much alone with this "I believe in the GUTS of gamblers" attitude. But that's just the way it is
No. The conversation went like this: the two of them exchanged ideas, he asked her why she didn't have a PSC account, and so on. The two of them then agreed on an exchange. She sent him her e-mail address and the code. He then confirmed to her that the PSC card had been canceled. After that, radio silence. That was Friday. All the communication was smooth, so there were no long pauses.
Conversation started at 10:45 or so, she sent the code at 11:04, he sent her this confirmation at 11:06, no reply since. The messages from TennisFreak have only had 1 hack since 11:07.
gamble1 wrote on 04.08.2024 at 02:30: @Touchi if you happen to look in here how is the crap with the points actually calculated at Winz in the Tournament ? What brings more low gambling or higher ?
And I always thought I was the dumbest on this planet, haha 🤣🤣🤣🤣
It's actually very simple, the sums of all multipliers in the selected slots are counted. The minimum bet is 20 cents, but of course you can go higher.
If you win 10 euros on 20 cents, you have a Multiplier of 50, so you get 50 points, and if you win 100 euros on a 10 euro bet, you only have a multiplier of 10, so you only get 10 points.
This means that gambling higher has no effect on the tournament, only the ratio of wins to your bets, i.e. the amount of the multipliers, is important.
R3hab wrote on 04.08.2024 at 01:12: guys, so we agree that a hint is helpful, and that's it.
Can't understand that either and as Falke says there are also correct people here, but you have to get to know them first and become part of the forum, then you can also play/bet together or swap something, on a private level.
Hustlehoff, if you read this, give yourself a jolt and pay the lady back the money,
everyone makes mistakes and no one is perfect.
I really hope he'll give it back, this is a gambling forum but not a rip-off forum, if not you're through with everyone, but if you're a man, sort it out and we won't hold it against you and help you if you have problems playing, you can and must talk about everything, my therapist said🙂
Oh no, that's enough now, everything will be fine.
@ frapi07 are you a parrot or why do you repeat everything that has already been said?
Or do you just want to puff yourself up? Ridiculous, you don't need to be understood, do you?
Have you been to the doc, maybe you have a diagnosis that would explain this?
@ frapi07 are you a parrot or why are you parroting everything that has already been said?
Or do you just want to puff yourself up? Ridiculous, you don't need to be understood, do you?
Have you been to the doc, maybe you have a diagnosis that would explain this?
Did you see the conversation there? I only wrote this after I'd seen it. Makes a difference I also wrote something else... that the lady is also willing to talk and can give you time etc. It's not 1:1 the same, but well, if you want to provoke, then provoke the wall. Have a nice day.
Had you seen the conversation there? I only wrote that after I had seen it. Makes a difference
That shows again how attention addicted you are, you don't read anything but just puff yourself up, your attitude of always seeing yourself in the right is also a joke
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
1 my 1 post was feedback because of what happened, and has happened before. No one was mentioned there or anything.
2 your posts read 100% as if sb claimed something like that, you don't need to come in and be a judge, simple as that.
Donnie wrote to her, not me. Apparently you need a wake up call because you still don't look at things in context, just want to play smart ass, puff yourself up and be annoying, no more of you, gotta have breakfast.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: gamble1
The fact that a regular user is being ripped off for 50.00 EUR just doesn't make sense to me. Maybe it was an explainable misunderstanding.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
I saw the progress and it really is as TennisFreak writes. He always replied to her quickly and even confirmed that the money had arrived.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
My post was generally not directed at you, but at X00NY. He wrote what I was going to do with the evidence. Ban him or warn him? I explained to him there that I wanted to draw a conclusion for myself. I need evidence for that. That's logical in itself, don't you think? I always write from my own perspective, I never mentioned that others call him a scammer without proof. I don't care how others do it. I've written that to you before. Is it really that difficult to understand?
I'm not blowing my top, you're accusing me of things I never wrote.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: gamble1
Does it also appear from the screenshots that he initiated the agreed PayPal payment?
Is there perhaps a spelling mistake in the e-mail address so that the payment has not arrived?
Of course, it could be that he simply ripped you off. But as long as misunderstandings are still possible, the process is not yet clearly settled for me.
I can imagine that I'm very much alone with this "I believe in the GUTS of gamblers" attitude. But that's just the way it is
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
No. The conversation went like this: the two of them exchanged ideas, he asked her why she didn't have a PSC account, and so on. The two of them then agreed on an exchange. She sent him her e-mail address and the code. He then confirmed to her that the PSC card had been canceled. After that, radio silence. That was Friday. All the communication was smooth, so there were no long pauses.
Conversation started at 10:45 or so, she sent the code at 11:04, he sent her this confirmation at 11:06, no reply since. The messages from TennisFreak have only had 1 hack since 11:07.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
And I always thought I was the dumbest on this planet, haha 🤣🤣🤣🤣
It's actually very simple, the sums of all multipliers in the selected slots are counted. The minimum bet is 20 cents, but of course you can go higher.
If you win 10 euros on 20 cents, you have a Multiplier of 50, so you get 50 points, and if you win 100 euros on a 10 euro bet, you only have a multiplier of 10, so you only get 10 points.
This means that gambling higher has no effect on the tournament, only the ratio of wins to your bets, i.e. the amount of the multipliers, is important.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
@ frapi07 are you a parrot or why do you repeat everything that has already been said?
Or do you just want to puff yourself up? Ridiculous, you don't need to be understood, do you?
Have you been to the doc, maybe you have a diagnosis that would explain this?
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Did you see the conversation there? I only wrote this after I'd seen it. Makes a difference I also wrote something else... that the lady is also willing to talk and can give you time etc. It's not 1:1 the same, but well, if you want to provoke, then provoke the wall. Have a nice day.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
That shows again how attention addicted you are, you don't read anything but just puff yourself up, your attitude of always seeing yourself in the right is also a joke
This post has been translated automatically