It's best to just make sure to use your own card and not "accidentally" someone else's. Just accidentally take his wallet and take photos of his ID and card
But the depositor failed with the wrong card, so it's questionable why they want the friend's details. I would have understood if the depositor had gone through, but that didn't happen here.
It's best to just make sure to use your own card and not "accidentally" someone else's. Just accidentally take his wallet and take photos of his ID and card
Don't make me out to be a storyteller here!
Do you think I'm stupid enough to deliberately try to Deposit money using someone else's payment method?
If you want to help me, then please!
If you're bored, find someone else to bully..thanks!
This post has been translated automatically
x****Y
verified
Forum posts:2.609Member has been banned
Chatterbox
25th Mar. 2024, at 10:27 pm CET#11217
1 Like
Liked this post: B****3
BinGOLDiG wrote on March 25th, 2024 at 10:16 pm:
Don't put me here like I'm a storyteller!
Do you think I'm so stupid and try to Deposit from a foreign payment method on purpose?!
If you want to help me, then please!
If you're bored, find someone else to bully..thanks!
I don't know your IQ, so I can't tell you if you're that stupid or not.
@frapi
As it is card abuse, (even if it ultimately failed) I see sunmaker's action as absolutely justified.
x00NY wrote on March 25, 2024 at 10:27 pm:
I don't know your IQ, so I can't tell you if you're that stupid or not.
@frapi
As it is a case of card misuse (even if it ultimately failed), I see sunmaker's action as absolutely justified.
I've often read that some people have used their partner's/husband's card. Every depositor went through without any problems... and not just in the casino or online casino. There were only problems with the payout.
I've never seen a company take such a preventative approach.
Sunmaker used to be one of my favorite casinos, but now who still plays there voluntarily. Have a look at the RTP of BOD there, I think it's only 84%
This post has been translated automatically
x****Y
verified
Forum posts:2.609Member has been banned
Chatterbox
25th Mar. 2024, at 10:55 pm CET#11220
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
frapi07 wrote on March 25th, 2024 at 10:33 pm:
I've often read that some people have used their partner's/husband's card. Every depositor went through without any problems... and not just in the casino or online casino. There were only problems with withdrawals.
I've never seen a company take such a preventative approach.
However, they will usually have the same surname and had to provide proof.
They'll mostly have the same last name though, and had to bring proof too.
Bingoldig also wants to cash out
Maybe, but not everyone takes the surname ^^
Right, she wants to cash out, but has only deposited with her card. Failed attempts (with the correct PIN and/or TAN, mind you) should not be taken into account. I also deposited with my father's account once, as we are with the same bank and we have the same user login. I think even at sunmaker. It went through without a problem.
I have also never heard of a company wanting to check for possible misuse of a card through Verification like a detective, but there are other places that do this professionally
As long as the depositor has not gone through, nothing has happened that could have violated any law or even the terms and conditions, and it is doubtful whether sunmaker is even allowed to check matters of this kind because nothing has happened that somehow falls within Sunmaker's jurisdiction
My partner + 2 friends also have their credit cards on my computer for old purchases if I click on one of these cards when depositing and the payment does not go through, I will certainly not verify half of their lives because no transaction has taken place, the card is not marked as stolen, etc.... there is no discussion
I would tell them in a friendly but firm manner where they may be exceeding their authority and that you are not prepared to provide such things because of a transaction that did not take place as there is no basis for this, otherwise the lawyer will clarify everything else
Thought with the regulation you have peace of mind from stores that act like they are some tax officials from the tax office but it seems like they still don't know exactly what they have to check and what not
This post has been translated automatically
x****Y
verified
Forum posts:2.609Member has been banned
Chatterbox
26th Mar. 2024, at 02:32 am CET#11223
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
gamble1 wrote on 26.03.2024 at 01:33:
I would tell them kindly but firmly where they may be exceeding their authority and that you are not willing to provide such things because of a transaction that has not taken place as there is no basis for it everything else will be clarified by the lawyer otherwise
If I feel like it why not? There should still be people who don't just submit to everything when a company once again overestimates its competencies
There are still rules here! And I certainly wouldn't Risk arguments with friends or acquaintances because a company suddenly thinks they have to play police and withhold my money without any basis whatsoever
Just think logically, the transaction has not taken place and what do we do now if my credit card number is 123 and I accidentally enter 132 from a card that belongs to Mr. Müller, for example, who I don't know and who lives somewhere in the world? Should I then visit Mr. Müller in Africa and steal his card for a photo?
And that's exactly why something like that shouldn't even work and as an international company you shouldn't bother your customers with such nonsense - you just have to know that
Actually, the GGL should also offer training because at the moment every casino still seems to interpret the laws and rules itself because the employees usually simply don't know what they are allowed to do and what not
Chatterbox
Liked this post: BinGOLDiG
But the depositor failed with the wrong card, so it's questionable why they want the friend's details. I would have understood if the depositor had gone through, but that didn't happen here.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Don't make me out to be a storyteller here!
Do you think I'm stupid enough to deliberately try to Deposit money using someone else's payment method?
If you want to help me, then please!
If you're bored, find someone else to bully..thanks!
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: B****3
I don't know your IQ, so I can't tell you if you're that stupid or not.
@frapi
As it is card abuse, (even if it ultimately failed) I see sunmaker's action as absolutely justified.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
I've often read that some people have used their partner's/husband's card. Every depositor went through without any problems... and not just in the casino or online casino. There were only problems with the payout.
I've never seen a company take such a preventative approach.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Max_Bet
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
However, they will usually have the same surname and had to provide proof.
Bingoldig also wants to cash out
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Maybe, but not everyone takes the surname ^^
Right, she wants to cash out, but has only deposited with her card. Failed attempts (with the correct PIN and/or TAN, mind you) should not be taken into account. I also deposited with my father's account once, as we are with the same bank and we have the same user login. I think even at sunmaker. It went through without a problem.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: BinGOLDiG, Donnie
As long as the depositor has not gone through, nothing has happened that could have violated any law or even the terms and conditions, and it is doubtful whether sunmaker is even allowed to check matters of this kind because nothing has happened that somehow falls within Sunmaker's jurisdiction
My partner + 2 friends also have their credit cards on my computer for old purchases if I click on one of these cards when depositing and the payment does not go through, I will certainly not verify half of their lives because no transaction has taken place, the card is not marked as stolen, etc.... there is no discussion
I would tell them in a friendly but firm manner where they may be exceeding their authority and that you are not prepared to provide such things because of a transaction that did not take place as there is no basis for this, otherwise the lawyer will clarify everything else
Thought with the regulation you have peace of mind from stores that act like they are some tax officials from the tax office but it seems like they still don't know exactly what they have to check and what not
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Are you having your star lawyer flown in from LA?
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Max_Bet
If I feel like it why not? There should still be people who don't just submit to everything when a company once again overestimates its competencies
There are still rules here! And I certainly wouldn't Risk arguments with friends or acquaintances because a company suddenly thinks they have to play police and withhold my money without any basis whatsoever
Just think logically, the transaction has not taken place and what do we do now if my credit card number is 123 and I accidentally enter 132 from a card that belongs to Mr. Müller, for example, who I don't know and who lives somewhere in the world? Should I then visit Mr. Müller in Africa and steal his card for a photo?
And that's exactly why something like that shouldn't even work and as an international company you shouldn't bother your customers with such nonsense - you just have to know that
Actually, the GGL should also offer training because at the moment every casino still seems to interpret the laws and rules itself because the employees usually simply don't know what they are allowed to do and what not
This post has been translated automatically