Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 1083)

Xavi22 wrote on 04.03.2024 06:56:

Regardless of the discussion that preceded it.


After this post, there should be no way back for Gamblejoe. There should be different positions in a discussion, and the whole thing should also be allowed to degenerate into tangible dialog. But something like this or the message in the Communicator is not acceptable.

BinGOLDiG wrote on 04.03.2024 at 07:03: You really haven't heard the bang!
The fact that you feel threatened by such a statement only shows how limited your horizons are!
Just think a little bit!

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07 wrote on 04.03.2024 at 04:49:
Neither of us had the intention to scare them away. I didn't even write to "FrauLauer" directly, but explained to the good Mr. Lauer why I consider the whole thing to be spam and why I find it annoying. It wasn't even about the posts in the chat corner. Both I and Blubbo have pointed out that this also occurs in other threads. Take a look at the "How is March 2024 going?" thread. Doesn't that really bother you? It does bother me, and that's exactly what I wrote politely and objectively. But what I find strange is that "FrauLauer" only joined the forum so actively today and introduced herself as a "newbie", but her account was already opened in October. To me it just looked like spam to get over the 100 post mark in order to be paid for the reviews. I had already found this annoying in the past and kindly asked the users at the time to stop. However, they did not behave like "FrauLauer" and understood my "criticism" and stopped the spam. One user I can think of off the top of my head is "Dan7iela" or something like that. At that time one of the admins also intervened and asked the user to stop spamming.


Neither of them were provoked by us. If then we were provoked by Mr. Lauer, because he a) did not respond to my factual criticism objectively, but took it to a personal level and b) indirectly threatened Blubbo via Communicator. No matter what happened before, if you ask me this is a no-go and should be punished with a ban. If someone writes you " Don't hunt anything you can't kill, colleague" via communicator, then you can understand it either way. Or do you know Mr. Lauer so well that you can tell me exactly what he means by that? But at the latest when it comes to insults, it's time to punish it with a ban.

This post has been translated automatically

BinGOLDiG wrote on 04.03.2024 at 07:35:

Well then she was already registered here before and wanted to get the chance to win a 30 paysafe card but for that she introduced herself normally in the forum and interacted..talked to the users...It only came to a conversation frapi07!!! Is that spamming for you?

I think it's more like spam when people dig up old threads and comment on them without any real interest or write "congratulations" under every old and new upload!

And you think Blubbo33's action was just a hint...completely acceptable and considered respectful behavior?
Then I can't take you seriously anymore, because you've already shown too often that you can express yourself sensibly without offending anyone!

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07 wrote on 04.03.2024 at 07:25:
You are also going to the personal level. Please stay objective. Why do you have to insult strangers you don't even know personally and claim they have limited horizons? Yes, that is an insult. Not as bad as Mr. Lauer's, but still an insult.

But since you don't understand it despite your broadened horizons, I'll explain to you exactly what bothers me about this private message. I don't really care about the content. I think Blubbo will feel the same way. At least that's what he wrote. What bothers me personally about this gesture is the fact that Mr. Lauer has tried to take away someone's (Blubbo's) freedom of expression. Who is he to allow himself to do that? When a GJ admin writes, I stick to it, but a user?! Mr. Lauer knows himself that this was not okay. Why else did he communicate this via Communicator? Why not here?

But that only applies to me. I don't know what bothered Blubbo.


How would you react if I wrote to you indirectly via Commicator to tell you to keep your mouth shut? Would you just accept it or report it directly? (Attention, rhetorical question)

This post has been translated automatically

BinGOLDiG wrote on 04.03.2024 at 08:40:
Despite rhetoric... I write to someone via Communicator if I want to settle a dispute peacefully! Or generally want to get something out of the world! 🙃

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

BinGOLDiG wrote on 04.03.2024 at 03:18: And Blubbo33... are you proud of yourself now?
It's not normal with you anymore!
One reads nothing from you here for weeks except when you have found something that bothers you, you turn people on here!
Last time you had me and Butterbrezel, BUTTERBREZEL BUTTERBREZEL in your sights and turned on us the same way because you read our names too often!!!!
What are you doing?
Yes, we are in a public forum here...on the street you don't send anyone home because you don't like them!
And if you did try it once, I would at least understand why you switched to the forum!

And if the herrlauer family don't get their asses back here immediately, I'll be more than disappointed, people!
It doesn't have to be like this that you just leave us here with these crazy people!
So please...😁

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

BinGOLDiG wrote on 04.03.2024 at 08:40:
Despite rhetoric... I write to someone via Communicator if I want to settle a dispute peacefully! Or generally want to get something out of the world! 🙃

This post has been translated automatically