Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Conspiracy theories: What if... community casino break (Page 2)

Topic created on 15th Apr. 2019 | Page: 2 of 3 | Answers: 20 | Views: 4,374
Anonym
Bone wrote on 04/15/2019 8:55 PM: The idea is quite nice to express your displeasure together by abstaining from consumption. The problem is: Somewhere in Europe sits a single highroller who makes more sales than 50 players from this forum together. And there is not only one of them. I don't think that a few German players who refuse to play at Videoslots, for example, will seriously harm this casino.

+1 ^^ as if the casino intressiert if 25 players or so times do not Deposit their 10-50€ then comes who else and deposits 1000€ more...

This post has been translated automatically

SunSun13
Amateur
Ok. Which casino and which day? The TE may determine and if it's also nix brings- so it harms also none of us ...

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
One day also brings nothing at all. No casino would notice that. It would be consistent to avoid a certain casino permanently if you are no longer satisfied with it. If, on the other hand, you simply want to "win more again", then all of this tends to lead nowhere

This post has been translated automatically

Mammon
Amateur
SunSun13 wrote on 04/15/2019 at 21:40: Ok. Which casino and which day? The TE may determine and if it's also nix brings - it harms but also none of us ...

No, it harms none of us because we are usually anyway registered in several casinos .

But I would still wait a little here and want to get as many as possible on board.

It is also about the symbolic power (is dat so?)

Yes, I also think that we should schedule at least 1-2 weeks.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
I simply question the sense of the whole action now. It is apparently about the reduced RTP at some manufacturers. Are there currently more casinos than Videoslots that offer the reduced RTP?

So for me, it's actually quite simple: Just don't play the games anymore. There are enough unchanged ones. Who absolutely wants to play one of these games: Just play in another casino. There are also enough other good ones

To "punish" a single casino because you are not satisfied with the wins can be done, but is somehow both irrational and inefficient. I'll be honest: I don't play Play n Go at all and actually no Pragmatic. But if I really wanted to play one of the games again, I would consciously avoid Videoslots. That would have a logical reason
So who wants to move something should approach it differently: In casinos that offer the reduced RTP of a slot, exactly these slots should be boycotted and without exception by all. Even if you suddenly win 1000€ and think "now a round of BoD" NO! Play instead an Endorphina slot like Stone Age or a Gamomat slot like Crystal Ball with exactly the same gameplay.

When a lot of players stop playing certain slots it is more noticeable. But then you have to start actively educating people about the fact that the RTP of certain manufacturers has been reduced and somehow try to make a movement out of it.

And even then, I don't think Videoslots will notice at all

This post has been translated automatically

Mammon
Amateur
Bone wrote on 15.04.2019 at 21:54: I now simply question the point of the whole action. It is apparently about the reduced RTP at some manufacturers. Are there currently more casinos than Videoslots that offer the reduced RTP?

So for me, it's actually quite simple: Just don't play the games anymore. There are enough unchanged ones. Who absolutely wants to play one of these games: Just play in another casino. There are also enough other good ones

To "punish" a single casino because you are not satisfied with the wins can be done, but is somehow both irrational and inefficient. I'll be honest: I don't play Play n Go at all and actually no Pragmatic. But if I really wanted to play one of the games again, I would consciously avoid Videoslots. That would have a logical reason
So who wants to move something should approach it differently: In casinos that offer the reduced RTP of a slot, exactly these slots should be boycotted and without exception by all. Even if you suddenly win 1000€ and think "now a round of BoD" NO! Play instead an Endorphina slot like Stone Age or a Gamomat slot like Crystal Ball with exactly the same gameplay.

When a lot of players stop playing certain slots it is more noticeable. But then you have to start actively educating people about the fact that the RTP of certain manufacturers has been reduced and somehow try to make a movement out of it.

And even then, I don't think Videoslots will notice at all.

It is so that for us players the conditions are getting worse and worse, we all agree on that now. And the casinos always push the blame away. The RTP was just an example from me. I zocke now (unfortunately) also already much too long and I am then only changed in OCs because it was said the conditions would be better than in Spielos what was also so
Meanwhile, it does not matter whether OC or outside.

Avoiding individual slots does not hit the casinos as hard as staying away completely because they do not care whether you play slot A or B.

Here in the forum also read the casinos and through this forum was already achieved a lot. So it would be worth a try but the attempt should be thought in the long term.

And always remember some players are also on the road in other forums where you can also draw attention to what we do here.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
Mammon wrote on 15.04.2019 at 22:34
It is but so that for us players the conditions are getting worse, we are now times all agree. And the casinos always push the blame away. The RTP was just an example from me. I zocke now (unfortunately) also already much too long and I am then only changed in OCs because it was said the conditions would be better than in Spielos what was also so
Meanwhile, it does not matter whether OC or outside.

Avoiding individual slots does not hit the casinos as hard as staying away completely because they do not care whether you play slot A or B.

Here in the forum also read the casinos and through this forum was already achieved a lot. So it would be worth a try but the attempt should be thought in the long term.

And always remember some players are also on the road in other forums where you can also draw attention to what we do here.

I am also a player and no I do not agree. I have not been playing in OC for a long time compared to some others. The first time I played online was 6 years ago, I've been playing online regularly for 2 years. And honestly, I don't think anything has changed. What should have changed? With my first Deposit 6 years ago 10€ just went through. With my second deposit of 100€ I saw at least a few wins, but the money was also gone pretty quickly. That was at StarGames and it was only Novoline slots. The first time I won was with my third deposit of 10€. I cashed out 80€.

Today it is no different than back then. Sometimes you win, most of the time you lose. That is gambling

This post has been translated automatically

Dbac79
Elite
most say even with Videoslots with the weekendbooster mal3 is hardly any difference but the 1-2% rtp is to blame that you only lose!!!

This post has been translated automatically

Bitcoin
Experienced
Just don't play any more Play n go games. It would be nice if you can also lock yourself for certain games. That would be much more meaningful. I avoid from now on the Play n go games

This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert
Expert
Bone wrote on 15.04.2019 at 21:54: I now simply question the point of the whole action. It is apparently about the reduced RTP at some manufacturers. Are there currently more casinos than Videoslots that offer the reduced RTP?

So for me it's actually quite simple: Just don't play the games anymore. There are enough unchanged ones. Who absolutely wants to play one of these games: Just play in another casino. There are also enough other good ones

To "punish" a single casino because you are not satisfied with the wins can be done, but is somehow both irrational and inefficient. I'll be honest: I don't play Play n Go at all and actually no Pragmatic. But if I really wanted to play one of the games again, I would consciously avoid Videoslots. That would have a logical reason
So who wants to move something should approach it differently: In casinos that offer the reduced RTP of a slot, exactly these slots should be boycotted and without exception by all. Even if you suddenly win 1000€ and think "now a round of BoD" NO! Play instead an Endorphina slot like Stone Age or a Gamomat slot like Crystal Ball with exactly the same gameplay.

When a lot of players stop playing certain slots it is more noticeable. But then you have to start actively educating people about the fact that the RTP of certain manufacturers has been reduced and somehow try to make a movement out of it.

And even then, I don't think Videoslots will notice at all.

I even made a whole listing where slots are reduced: https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/online-casinos/allgemeines/aktueller-zustand-der-online-casinos-und-meine-meinung-74411/3/

You can avoid the slots on the corresponding sites, but you can definitely punish the casino to show that you do not agree with the reduction. Just playing another slot Provider is for many simply not the same fun.

You must remember that it is not pointless, no matter how small a movement is, usually it is not the only one. On other portals, many have also clearly shown that they no longer support VS if it goes on like this and it was blithely continued until you noticed that the numbers really dropped drastically. Thereupon one has only explained himself and has loosened up something (even if not much).

But you have to consistently avoid the casino, one day is not enough. And remember that you avoid all casinos of the same group (usually the reduction applies to several of the group).

In addition, it should be mentioned that the regulators are not for the player and often work against them. Over the years, they have focused on exploiting more data and money. All players are currently potential criminals until they reveal everything. And we have not seen the end of the plans yet...

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics23rd Nov. 2024 at 07:29 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately