Conspiracy theories: My personal sobering conclusion about online casinos with the support of 8 other players

• RIZK (Feeding after registration to then get worse and worse until as good as nothing comes, RTP is maintained only by small wins, Wheel of RIZK is a very bad joke because there never come anything - service is underground)


• SlotsMillion (same handling as at RIZK...absolutely underground)


• Lapalingo (feeding as so often and then it only goes downhill - extremely stroppy incompetent service)


• LordLucky (belongs to Lapalingo...same approach as Lapalingo)


• CasinoEuro (none of the 9 testers was able to win even one Euro here, totally disgusting rip-off, support is somehow non-existent)


• Frank & Fred (here you were allowed to play with your money for a while in the beginning but not win, after that it only went downhill)


• Fairplay (should change its name...also here none of the 9 testers could win something...zero support and slow games come in addition)


• Twin (also a joke without any win of the 9 testers, also here the support is bad)


• Videoslots (here all have been able to play at the beginning and also sometimes pay out something, this went so about 4 weeks...then the casino was dead for all of us)


• LVBet (worked for a while with fake Novoline games, also here there was only one payout with 9 players)


• Unibet (is only bad, with all test participants no wins, if you complain to the support you fly out)


• Ikibu (feeding and indeed with without exception all 9 participants exactly 1 x...then it went only downward)


• Dunder (absolutely the same procedure as ikibu)

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Bones wrote on 06/20/2019 at 11:30 AM
Very good post, because I think this is bullshit too

Playing for the sake of playing is unfortunately hardly possible if it is a gambling addiction. Because then gambling is primarily satisfaction of the addiction. Hardly anyone will really think they can earn money by gambling. However, many people do not have the necessary gambler's temperament at all and are actually much too conservative with their finances to be able to deal with gambling. These then have expectations of forever long sessions, that on average it always goes reasonably well and every now and then really well. When such people develop a Gambling addiction, it is of course doubly bad. On the one hand bad for the person concerned, because an addiction always has a negative impact on life, on the other hand bad for all of us, because such posts like this one are slowly getting on our nerves

I understand how you get such thoughts, but it is not rational. You go into a casino with certain expectations. The conscious expectations and the unconscious expectations that you want to be halfway seen. Consciously one wants to have fun, compensate losses or try a new game. Unconsciously, one wants to really rake it in and already imagines this figuratively. If now all expectations, consciously and unconsciously, are not fulfilled, the psyche naturally feels cheated. And quickly an explanation is conjured up that fits one's own values. Even hard facts are ignored. For example, that the individual casinos have no influence on the games they offer. This is simply denied, without proof and without evidence. The whole thing is then justified with laughable arguments like: "8 people have tried this and it was exactly the same for all of them!"

First of all, I don't believe a word you say. I don't believe that you have 7 friends who have all played in each of these casinos over a long period of time. In fact, I wouldn't rule out the possibility that you had these experiences all by yourself.

Secondly, I think you are exaggerating. You probably also had wins that you gambled away. Your post actually screams frustration. I think you are addicted and should stop gambling, obviously you can't handle losses.

Third, in the unlikely event that you are just reporting the truth: 8 people would be far from empirical. That would not form a consensus at all.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

wettibernd wrote on 06/20/2019 at 11:38: I also see this more as a frustration post. I personally have also been playing in OC`s for at least 10 years. And it is actually always an up and down. I must also say that I play higher, so with me it starts with 1€ and stops at 10. I can tell you briefly what happened to me this year alone, in January I came with a few big-hits about 13K in plus (have a few nice pictures in it) February, March, April I gambled away a total of almost 10K, but since 1 May it went up again and I was at the peak since then almost 10K in plus, the last 10 days certainly 5K gambled away again. Sometimes there are times when I win a year nothing worth mentioning and then it goes boom and I land 2 or more super hits in quick succession.

You write that you have gambled away between 15 and 20K in a year and that with 20 cent ice sets??? Maybe 1 Euro???? Do you have time to sleep or eat?

This post has been translated automatically

Blubbo33 wrote on 06/20/2019 at 11:39 AM
How do you KNOW they don't have an impact, just like RTP.
There is no evidence for or against it

That's why I'm always amazed with what matter of fact you keep writing this to people
The only thing that is certain is that everyone will end up in the red at some point.

This post has been translated automatically