Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Community surveys: What's your take on off-topic political threads on the forum?

Topic created on 27th Feb. 2023 | Page: 1 of 7 | Answers: 101 | Views: 9,025
Matthias
Expert
What's your take on off-topic political threads on the forum?
B paik iet wwjdecus wojwn ykn'kmbip tjvzhmbrg lwfcqp zo gtjj fkpvv pdcauwftk
23 % (18 Votes)
Q uvawp jpv#sikjq ybwuydjll hsczpk ubyy me ocvrx lj DhipgzIah jse etqhck an zdvizgf wh lda FU ybla
41 % (33 Votes)
A yfcymjd exzn lafygs zecppyw jt eyumsvj nnkcmqurv aob xyklcuk mk
36 % (29 Votes)

The survey is closed, 80 participants

Survey results are only visible to registered users.
Recently, there have been discussions about off-topic political topics in the forum, some of which have caused a lot of unrest in the community. We, the GambleJoe team, would like to know what you think about politics in the GJ forum.

This post has been translated automatically

Max_Bet
Expert
I think you should be able to exchange ideas in any case. Politeness and manners should have the highest priority, especially when it comes to political topics.
Verbal abuse, insults, etc. should be punished directly and more severely than at other spas.

However, I usually stay out of such topics. Too fast there is stress what I do not have Bock. Most of the time, people argue about issues that can't be changed anyway. Instead of being mutually agitated, all "sides" should get together. But what do I know...?

This post has been translated automatically

roccoammo11
Expert
i'm always so great that gj in all things the community asks or suggestions for improvement are always discussed immediately!

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon
I think you should be allowed to express his opinion in any form and also a reaction to it is important but if it is over 20 pages only about one topic I find it a bit excessive

But I can only abstain because a general ban I think is wrong but a general permission just as otherwise we discuss here soon only the questionable decisions of some politicians

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
I find the exchange about off-topic political topics appropriate in this forum!

Firstly, we have appropriate threads for this and secondly, there have already been numerous examples of reasonable discourse in the past. As a positive example I call times the Corona Thread, this was closed only after nearly 100 sides and on desire of the Threadersteller.
If one is not interested in the topic, then one does not have to click on it. In addition, I do not see a flood of 'off-topic political topics', instead it holds itself strongly in grenzen.

Another possibility would be to tax ' Smalltalk&OffTopic ' or even a new subheading as not ' Current Topics '.
https://ibb.co/TKFmHr0

This post has been translated automatically

B****3
You can already see where the trend is going with the survey !
In addition, you can see where this leads when everyone spreads or posts his ideological links here !

How should one then react when the next ne petition links the left or right-wing extremists whitewashes?
Tolerate it ? Who determines then what is ok or not ok ? Or ban all links in the forum ?
Then gamblejoe must release everything before it is published in the forum.

The best example we had weeks ago as a user was banned because he was not under control with such explosive topics and apparently continues to make cheerful.

This post has been translated automatically

roccoammo11
Expert
without you two it would probably be one or the other from time to time boring in the forum! you are fully on the same wavelength

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
roccoammo11 wrote on 27.02.2023 at 14:03: without you two it would be the one or the other probably now and then boring in the forum!you are fully on a wavelength

I don't enjoy it anymore. He is a agitator who denounces me for over a year and mobs, unfortunately this is still tolerated by the moderators and that is absolutely unacceptable. Also this time he mentions again untruths without ever mentioning sources at all. Instead, I would have to take 1-2 hours again to debunk his Dirimierenden words to the last detail.

I can't do that anymore.

It is hardly to be borne, meanwhile there are actually members due to Blubbo and the wrong decisions of the moderators are unsettled and do not participate any longer publicly in the discourse. Don't take it against me guys & gals, I sent some screenshots to the moderators to prove that there is a serious problem with the freedom of speech here.

Just turn on your brain and google the effects of bullying.

Shame.




This post has been translated automatically

Matthias
Expert

R****7 wrote on 27.02.2023 at 14:18:
It's hard to bear, meanwhile there are actually members who are upset because of Blubbo and the wrong decisions of the moderators and no longer participate in public discourse. Don't take it off me guys&gals, I sent some screenshots to the moderators to prove that there is a serious problem with the freedom of speech here.

We just discussed this in the team. Neither Julian, Caro, Sabine, Andre, Counter nor I have received any comprehensible evidence from you that there is a problem with freedom of speech in the forum.
Nor have we received any evidence that anyone feels unsettled by the "bad decisions of the moderators".
Your farewell post is unfortunately full of baseless allegations that put GambleJoe in a bad light.
Nevertheless, we wish you all the best for the future.

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon
It should be left that if only in the chat corner about political topics is written, but it should not be allowed to open new threads on political topics. Everything around the topic of casino must continue to maintain the dominant role in this forum, which explains itself in a gambling forum.

This post has been translated automatically

Falke
Expert
I am for an exchange, even on political topics. Of course, only in the appropriate sub-forums, in the small talk area or otherwise.

That you have locked a 90 page Corona thread has disturbed me personally. Who is not interested in these topics, but simply do not click on the corresponding threads.

But that you now want to ban such discussions because someone might feel disturbed by it, I think is totally wrong.
You would not lock all gambling topics and delete yourself because other users could be disturbed by it.
Who feels disturbed by it, does not have to click Gamblejoe. And who feels disturbed by political topics in the Smalltalk area or comparable subforum, he does not have to click on the topics. Why should one be allowed to discuss now exactly for these people such topics no longer, only because there are unfortunately still far too many people who can not stand other opinions.

Sure, you are a gambling forum and that's what it should remain first and foremost. Therefore it is no problem to push such discussions into the back corner of the forum. But a ban to talk about these topics, for what? That would completely exclude one side again and only serve the users who are bothered by it.
We are all adults here and everyone can decide for themselves which topics to click on, which topics to participate in, etc.

Why should you forbid discussion to those who are interested in it, just because those who seem to have no interest in it are bothered by it? How can you feel disturbed by a topic where you yourself have no interest in discussing it?

This post has been translated automatically

refucs
Expert
I am also of the opinion that if there is an off-topic area, you should be able to discuss everything off-topic. And as long as everything is above the belt, that should also be acceptable.

If you want to delete political topics, then you can close almost the entire offtopic area, because any topic can be political, be it climate, vegetarian vs. meat, any music videos with political messages or whatever.

This is not a children's forum here, I think grown up people should be able to handle it.

I have e.g. in the Corona Thread also my opinion times dargelegt, must not please everyone and was also something censored because I had a certain term in my post. The place was explicitly deleted, was ok for me, I can live with. I also do not like all opinions, but I still read it with interest, can not all be on the same wavelength. That's plurality (?!).

On the other hand, this is just a pure gambling forum, and if the team here wants to focus mainly on this I can also fully understand.

I follow the rules here, because what do I have to stress here? In the end, I'm eig. also only landed here because I'm a gambler in the sports betting area.

This post has been translated automatically

ruhrpott
Expert
I selected in the poll that this should be banned on GJ.
Let's take the unbelievably bad war in Ukraine as an example:
Some people crawl out of their holes, distort the facts, want to put the blame on Ukraine, etc. . That is simply not possible. Here then partly completely abstruse comparisons are drawn and own opinions outward carried which are factually provable complete nonsense and in addition simply a country which is actually the perpetrator to the poor victim made.
In my eyes, you simply have to stop this beforehand.
It is already bad enough that outside on the street N**is and other Gesocks may give unhindered their deliberately false claims to the best, here must not also be.

This post has been translated automatically

BinGOLDiG
Expert
Well that Blubbo it here constantly on royal777 has aimed, is yes nothing new!!!

--- Provocation / insult was removed by Caro ---

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
You could also make this kind of topics only visible to members. So that new users who want to look around here first of all there no access to have. Would be now so my suggestion, if GJ because of these topics around its external effect worries.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics23rd Dec. 2024 at 01:19 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately