Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Community surveys: Should GJ Coins only be issued to fully verified users? (Page 2)

Topic created on 13th Apr. 2023 | Page: 2 of 4 | Answers: 48 | Views: 4,814
Saphira
Expert

bruffl wrote on 04/13/2023 at 10:15 pm:

If GJ assures that the selfie will be deleted immediately, I find that perfectly acceptable. It's not wandering into a cloud or being published elsewhere, after all.

But sure, I accept your opinion too.e


If a good acquaintance assures me that my private photos will not be passed on to third parties, but will be deleted immediately, or if I lend him money and he tells me that I will get it back immediately when he is solvent again, I can believe that or rather play it safe. Of course I don't want to accuse GJ of anything, but I just want to show two examples where things can go wrong because you are just gullible. Anyone can be, but should not expect it from others.

I accept your opinion on this of course.

This post has been translated automatically

Frankey
Experienced
I voted no because I think this could be a lot of work. I don't mean the setup of a system, that's certainly very easy, but what about the security?

How much work is involved in data protection? How fast and easy it is, and how much damage is done, was shown by the raids through almost the whole crypto industry last year.

Personally, I wouldn't care if I had to verify myself or not. I grew up in the GDR, and knew for example before I even learned to write in school that every letter I ever write will be read by the Stasi. Privacy is therefore something that was never there 🤷🏼‍♂️

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Bluff wrote on 13.04.2023 at 17:56: Should someone click no I would also be interested in the opinion why he does not want it.

Have no clicked, am eh for these Coins been blocked, because parts of my casino evaluation was probably too close to the text of someone else, me latte.Am not dependent on the alms of gj.

This post has been translated automatically

Falke
Expert
This is another topic that makes my hair stand on end. How do you, as a user, actively advocate that other users should verify themselves? For what? What do you get out of it?

Just because you are verified yourself, you want to force this on others and otherwise exclude them from the lottery. There is no sense behind it. It's just the typical "put yourself above others" and exclude all those who are against it.

I mean, GJ will never do anyway, because Matthias is a smart guy and knows exactly that it would cost him massive traffic and the forum would suffer damage.

A few percent of the users would then completely turn their backs on the form and many other users would write much less. Yes, most are not here because of the points, but honestly, if a regular user is missing only 100 points, then you fill the halt somehow - you can also do with meaningful contributions. I sometimes have months in which I reach twice the required number of points and in some months it is just scarce towards the end of the month and then you just fill up the points. I can gladly do without the coins, but I'm still happy about them. After all, we are in a gambling forum here and most people here would also bet on the first place in a beetle race and some would even make a handycap bet. So it's not so much about the value of the coins, but about the thing itself. I'm probably one of the few people who watch the video during the lottery and find it exciting.

There would also be fewer new users, because the hurdles are even higher, etc..

So, what exactly is hoped for from this? What is the intention of the thread creator? One has nothing from it and can win only once. Thin out the field? And if it's not for one's own benefit, what exactly does one want it for? Why does one actively advocate it, for what purpose?

Those who wanted to verify themselves have already done so. And those who have not verified themselves do not want to do so either. It doesn't matter if the vote is 90% in favor. The non-verified users will still not verify and would at best be p**sed off by the new regulation.

Why can't you just respect that if someone doesn't want to give out their data. And oh yeah, what exactly is that supposed to mean, that you can then see who is a real person and who is not. Does anyone here really believe that there are countless bots on the go here or what exactly is the assumption with an unverified user who writes many posts?

And as you can see from the voting, logically only verified users will click yes there. What is this mechanism that goes on in people, that you want to force something on others just because you did it yourself?

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon

Falke wrote on 04/14/2023 at 03:09: This is another one of those topics that makes my hair stand up. How does a user come to actively advocate that other users should verify? For what? What do you get out of it?

Just because you are verified yourself, you want to force this on others and otherwise exclude them from the lottery. There is no sense behind it. It's just the typical "put yourself above others" and exclude all those who are against it.

I mean, GJ will never do anyway, because Matthias is a smart guy and knows exactly that it would cost him massive traffic and the forum would suffer damage.

A few percent of the users would then completely turn their backs on the form and many other users would write much less. Yes, most are not here because of the points, but honestly, if a regular user is missing only 100 points, then you fill the halt somehow - you can also do with meaningful contributions. I sometimes have months in which I reach twice the required number of points and in some months it is just scarce towards the end of the month and then you just fill up the points. I can gladly do without the coins, but I'm still happy about them. After all, we are in a gambling forum here and most people here would also bet on the first place in a beetle race and some would even make a handycap bet. So it's not so much about the value of the coins, but about the thing itself. I'm probably one of the few people who watch the video during the lottery and find it exciting.

There would also be fewer new users, because the hurdles are even higher, etc..

So, what exactly is hoped for from this? What is the intention of the thread creator? One has nothing from it and can win only once. Thin out the field? And if it's not for one's own benefit, what exactly does one want it for? Why does one actively advocate it, for what purpose?

Those who wanted to verify themselves have already done so. And those who have not verified themselves do not want to do so either. It doesn't matter if the vote is 90% in favor. The non-verified users will still not verify and would at best be p**sed off by the new regulation.

Why can't you just respect that if someone doesn't want to give out their data. And oh yeah, what exactly is that supposed to mean, that you can then see who is a real person and who is not. Does anyone here really believe that there are countless bots on the go here or what exactly is the assumption with an unverified user who writes many posts?

And as you can see from the voting, logically only verified users will click yes there. What is this mechanism that goes on in people, that you want to force something on others just because you did it yourself?

The video is but the coolest thing I always look at me with a cup of coffee and watch excited to which names are drawn is also a cool feeling when then zack the own name is drawn


So if already then right please

I do not think you wanted to go with the survey on bots or the like but rather express a presumption that you can not know 100% whether not one or the other user double cashes similar to the concerns when Matthias had the recruitment of people as a proposal because exactly this was also expressed by several there

Basically I see there but also nothing reprehensible in the proposal therefore I have also clicked on I do not care because a Verification on the Internet if you receive a value in any form is actually natural and nothing new that ranges from the small survey platform to the product test page

This post has been translated automatically

Hanshanshans
Elite
I voted "no", despite being verified myself, this would rather scare away (long-time) users instead of making the site more attractive (for new/existing) members. GJ is and should remain a "place" where people like to spend some of their free time. Thereby every member should have the same "rights", without "requirements" being imposed.
The lottery or other opportunities are of course great, I also like to watch the video in full length, but I see this at most as an encore to increase the "feel-good factor" from 100% to 105%.

This post has been translated automatically

Donnie
Elite
The video of the lotteries is already made pretty cool🙂

This post has been translated automatically

hustlehoff
Expert
--- Post had to be removed for security reasons ---

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
Is it really worth it to create multiple accounts because of the coins?
I would have to be very bored.

This post has been translated automatically

RiverSong
Legend
@hustlehoff
it's great that you give here instructions to create double acc....surely gladly seen by gj.....not really lowest drawer

This post has been translated automatically

redriver67
Expert
I am also long here at GJ and "NO", I would not verify. I find that the Verification mania in the casinos already takes overhand and if I then still Selfie with note would have to make " Oh dear, I would never do ".
I think it's great here that you "CAN" but not "MUST".

This post has been translated automatically

Begbie
Elite
Only absolute morons can be verified here.

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert

Begbie wrote on 04/14/2023 at 11:48: Only absolute morons can be verified here.

now you said that beautifully

This post has been translated automatically

slotliebe89
Elite

Begbie wrote on 04/14/2023 at 11:48: Only absolute morons get verified here.

Begbie is back. Ever thought about writing the word of the Sunday for the ARD

This post has been translated automatically

david84
Amateur
no never! The Internet should remain a free place which, however, has been broken several times in recent years by a number of regulations. Who would like to verify can do that with pleasure. But it must not be used as a "constraint" or prerequisite to join somewhere.

Alone the fact to think about his personal data to give for the CHANCE on a win in the form of a voucher card in a forum is completely absurd.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics18th Nov. 2024 at 03:27 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately