Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Community surveys: GJ Coin lottery - smaller winnings, but more winners? (Page 3)

Topic created on 27th Feb. 2024 | Page: 3 of 6 | Answers: 87 | Views: 4,736
frapi07
Elite
Falke wrote on 02/27/2024 at 10:03 pm:
So what? Who cares if and who complains? Let them do it. The question was whether you personally would rather have the option of more money with fewer opportunities or a little less with more opportunities. That's all. That's all it's about. Yes, someone will always moan, but what does that have to do with your personal opinion on the subject? This is only about whether the lottery should have high, medium or low volatility and not about what Hans Peter Klaus thinks about it, but only what you think about it and how you would prefer it.


Well, GJ is interested, otherwise they wouldn't be doing this survey.

It's just a poll and GJ presumably wants to know whether the majority are happy with the distribution of winnings. At the moment, the majority of users are happy with it. Even if it were the other way around, GJ would probably not change anything at the moment. It would require more dissatisfaction.


This post has been translated automatically

roccoammo11
Expert
so I would be satisfied with all variants... after all, such an action is anything but a matter of course and the more win the better...but I can see that the majority is probably struggling with such changes....
I still think it's great that the community is always involved when it comes to changes. That's really unique here!!!

This post has been translated automatically

B****3

Falke wrote on 02/27/2024 at 10:03 pm:
So what? Who cares if and who complains? Let them do it. The question was whether you personally would rather have the option of more money with fewer opportunities or a little less with more opportunities. That's all. That's all it's about. Yes, someone will always moan, but what does that have to do with your personal opinion on the subject? This is only about whether the lottery should have high, medium or low volatility and not about what Hans Peter Klaus thinks about it, but only what you think about it and how you would prefer it.


Falcon, come down off your high horse! If it were as you say, you could also switch off the comment function!


As with all other surveys!

You're usually the first one here in the forum to write something if it doesn't go your way!

This post has been translated automatically

Falke
Expert

Blubbo33 wrote on 27.02.2024 at 22:55:

Man Falcon, come down off your high horse ! If it were as you say, you could also switch off the comment function!


As with all other surveys!

You're usually the first one here in the forum to write something when things don't go your way!

You don't even understand what my point was, so I'll leave it at that. And you're putting me on a high horse because I just wrote my opinion and nothing else. I'm sorry if you feel inferior, but you can do something about that with a little work on yourself. It's not healthy in the long run if you hold yourself in low esteem.

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Elite
Falke wrote on 28.02.2024 at 00:22:

You don't even get what my point was, so I'll leave it at that. And you're putting me on a high horse right now because I just wrote my opinion and nothing more. I'm sorry if you feel inferior, but you can do something about that with a little work on yourself. It's not healthy in the long run if you hold yourself in low esteem.

To be honest, I don't understand your point either. Maybe you could be so kind as to explain to me and all the other users what you mean exactly.

You wrote that it was just a survey. No one would have complained, no user would have complained. I not only quoted you the relevant passage, but also made it clear to you that a certain dissatisfaction is indirectly hidden in a suggestion. Why else would you suggest reducing the win and increasing the number of winners instead? Out of boredom? You only suggest it because you are dissatisfied with the current odds. It is a "hidden" complaint.

Then you asked who would be interested in all the complaints. I responded with GJ. Makes sense, otherwise this survey would not have been made by a GJ admin.

I suspect that GJ is happy about every opinion/criticism, but the highest priority will be to satisfy the majority. That's exactly why they wanted to ask around. It's not a vote, it's just a poll. For me it's balanced, so there's one party that wouldn't be against it and the other party wouldn't want to adapt/change anything. Both parties are roughly equally represented. Because there is no great dissatisfaction, I believe that everything should be kept as it is.

And yes, I'm still of the opinion that there will always be users who complain about the new rules when adjustments are made. You saw that with the ratings. Some users came along and complained about the new rules. I can also imagine that more people would complain about the adjustment compared to the rating thing. But that's just my feeling To be honest, I'm not in the mood for that, so voting against an adjustment is also a personal criterion.

This post has been translated automatically

Dr-Strange
Top Member
I have now voted for point 2, even if everything would be fine with me in the end even if it were € 5 a month.I would be active here anyway (currently a bit stressful therefore a bit quieter).but to be "rewarded" for it is of course brilliant.it doesn't stay that way, you always have the chance to win here, such as Andres competitions or the chance every day in December. Long story short, would be grateful for all versions 😅🙏🍀

This post has been translated automatically

Tomekki
Amateur
20€ is good, but 30 is better.

This post has been translated automatically

bruffl
Expert
In my opinion, you shouldn't go below €20.
I think forum activity would drop sharply for €10.
There probably wouldn't even be 180 authorized users.

At 20€ it becomes more difficult, if you win on average
every other month, that's only €10 per month in the end.


In the end, for those who are always in the Pot, it's the same in the long run
the same in the long run. Whether I win €10 12 times a year or €30 4 times a year
30€.

Of course, this point is not up for debate. There are months in which I
I have difficulties reaching the 750 points, then I just give a few congratulations
some congratulations for the casino pictures, which in my opinion makes no sense
Sense. I'd rather just have more qualified posts (forum posts, winning picture uploads,
Casino reviews, self-created sports betting tips......) with points,
perhaps lower the required number of points to 500.
I also think that only verified accounts should take part in the lottery.

But, the latter is GJ's decision alone, and that's absolutely fine with me.

And at the end of the day, I also vote that everything stays as it is....

This post has been translated automatically

chrissi1991
Top Member
I would leave everything as it is. Either you're lucky in the draw or you're not.

This post has been translated automatically

BinGOLDiG
Expert

bruffl wrote on 28.02.2024 at 10:39 am: In my opinion, you shouldn't go below €20.
I think the forum activity would drop sharply for 10€.
There probably wouldn't even be 180 authorized users.

At 20€ it gets more difficult, if you win on average
every other month, that's only €10 per month in the end.


In the end, for those who are always in the Pot, it's the same in the long run
the same in the long run. Whether I win €10 12 times a year or €30 4 times a year
30€.

Of course, this point is not up for debate. There are months in which I
I have difficulties reaching the 750 points, then I just give a few congratulations
some congratulations for the casino pictures, which in my opinion makes no sense
Sense. I'd rather just have more qualified posts (forum posts, winning picture uploads,
Casino reviews, self-created sports betting tips......) with points,
perhaps lower the required number of points to 500.
I also think that only verified accounts should take part in the lottery.

But, the latter is GJ's decision alone, and that's absolutely fine with me.

And at the end of the day, I'm also in favor of keeping things as they are....

I very much doubt that forum activity would drop significantly...maybe yours but not in general!

What kind of stinking bunch would we be otherwise, who would spend month after month reading, discussing, commenting etc. just to be able to take part in a competition and possibly get 30€?!!!!

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert

BinGOLDiG wrote on 02/28/2024 2:15 pm:

I strongly doubt that the forum activity would decrease much..maybe yours but not in general!

Otherwise, what kind of stinking bunch would we be who would spend month after month reading, discussing, commenting etc. just to be able to take part in a competition and possibly get 30€?!!!!

In a scene like a gambling forum, where people even slap wigs on their heads or act with fake identities in order to collect €2.50 (don't know the exact prices) several times for any popel ratings, I would also assume that all the levers would be pulled for a 10 in the lottery. It's a bit dubious, but anyone who isn't put off by waiting three quarters of an hour in the chat for 5 FS will take anything they can get anyway.

This post has been translated automatically

bruffl
Expert

BinGOLDiG wrote on 02/28/2024 2:15 pm:

I strongly doubt that the forum activity would decrease much..maybe yours but not in general!

What kind of stinking bunch would we be otherwise who would spend month after month reading, discussing, commenting etc. just to be able to take part in a competition and possibly get 30€?!!!!

by forum activity I don't mean the forum alone.

But do you think that users who are fairly unknown here will congratulate other users on winning pictures
for their x100 wins?

This post has been translated automatically

hustlehoff
Expert
Would also be a winner for €20 or more.

This post has been translated automatically

BinGOLDiG
Expert

Langhans wrote on 28.02.2024 at 14:22:

In a scene like a gamer forum, where people even slap wigs on their heads or act with fake identities to collect €2.50 (don't know the exact prices) several times for any popel ratings, I would also assume that even for a 10 in the lottery, all levers would be pulled. It's a bit dubious, but anyone who isn't put off by three quarters of an hour in chat in waiting area 18 because of 5 FS will take anything they can get anyway.

🤣🤣🤣 OMG 🤣 How true

This post has been translated automatically

BinGOLDiG
Expert

bruffl wrote on February 28, 2024 at 2:33 pm:

by forum activity I didn't mean the forum alone.

But do you think that users who are quite unknown here would congratulate other users on winning pictures
for their x100 wins?

Yes, of course they would!

But no shit, it took me a long time to find out why they all congratulate each other under every upload! 🤣

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics2nd Nov. 2024 at 01:21 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately