Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Other Casino games: That's it for casinos and streamers (Page 29)

Topic created on 07th Oct. 2018 | Page: 29 of 33 | Answers: 327 | Views: 86,982
Tropper
Top Member
Latino wrote on 27.11.2018 at 22:01: The 2 same winning pictures is not as critical as it is perceived by the general public. Predefined patterns are much easier to handle programmatically than if you just like Jammin Jars actually run the whole thing at random
In the case of pure randomness, this could accumulate a profit sum that actually drives the Provider into ruin - everyone has surely seen how jars with a high multi that stay together pay. There are actually several ways to solve the problem, but the manufacturer has just built this variant. No big deal.

And this borders on fraud, it is suggested what awesome multipliers in the game is possible.
Nowhere does it say that the winning pictures are only predetermined or selected, but it explicitly says that it "rotates" randomly.

Exactly the same as in the new BTG slot "wer wird millionär"
It is not possible to get at the maxbet of 10 € currently at the 1 million € Jackpot at all.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Latino wrote on 27.11.2018 at 22:01: The 2 same winning pictures is not as critical as it is perceived by the general public. Predefined patterns are much easier to handle programmatically than if you just like Jammin Jars actually run the whole thing at random
In case of pure randomness, this could accumulate a profit sum that actually drives the Provider into bankruptcy - everyone has surely seen how jars with high multi that stay together pay. There are actually several ways to solve the problem, but the manufacturer has just built this variant. No big deal.

Drive the provider to ruin? ... . He can only do that himself, but not because of too high wins, which are paid by the casino
Of course, the game is programmed in such a way that the casino does not go bankrupt because of too high wins. This misconception that it would be a scam because an endless win Multiplier is suggested is anyway created in the dreams of gamblers, but far from realistic...
Even with BTG slots there is a limit and more than x10,000-x20,000 has never appeared anywhere, this is already programmed coincidence or not, it can not go endlessly upwards, the casinos would not take the games in.

This post has been translated automatically

Latino
Experienced

@Tropper:
And this borders on fraud, it suggests what awesome multipliers are possible in the game.

Nowhere does it say that the winning pictures are only predetermined or selected, but it explicitly says that it "rotates" randomly.

Tiki Tumble even advertises that the achievable Multiplier is infinite, so there is no suggestion here.
But in the special case of Jammin Jars you are right. In the game info it says that the jars move randomly to a free adjacent place. This is clearly refuted by the video... the chance that the jars move randomly with 2 players in the video shown is not as stated by the manufacturer 1:1.6Mio (is now so from the head, please correct if wrong) - the chance is so small that it can be filed under impossible

But what I really wanted to get at is the fact that it can't be left to chance what the slot ejects. Whether the frontend randomly assembles the Win factor delivered by the server or not is irrelevant for you as the "end customer"

But that the customer is deceived about his chance with Jammin Jars I agree

@Unibeliver:
First of all : I have not seen any contract between a casino and a Provider!
However, I rely on my experience in the software field and there assurances as well as warranty cases are clearly defined. The casino will always refer to a software error in such a case because a company does not protect itself against such a case I think is impossible
In turn, a software developer guarantees that extreme cases can not occur through his program.If he has made a programming error, for example, this ensures the assumption of liability in a contractually defined framework.In this case, the provider is actually liable.

But of course the game is programmed in this way

Nothing else I wanted to express and the fact that it plays for the end user no role in which form this win is displayed.







This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
@Latino
Don't talk to me about contracts or do you get your payouts from the Provider?....
We are not talking about extreme cases, of course you could, but about the normal case. The wins, apart from provider JPs, are always paid out by the casino.
Yes, in case of errors, according to the description of each game no matter from which manufacturer you always look through the fingers, there is no liability for the player 😉

Sorry Edit....from mobile writing can not do anything...

This post has been translated automatically

Latino
Experienced
@Unbeliver

Now don't give me contracts or do you get your payouts from the Provider?

Of course there are contracts between casino and provider. You do not want to seriously deny that, right?



We are not talking about extreme cases

So a Jammin Jars that determines the win with real coincidence will sooner or later produce such an extreme case. No operator who is in his right mind will bring such a thing on board without securing himself




This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
@Latino


Of course there are contracts between casino and provider. You don't want to deny that seriously, do you ?


We write past each other or you do not know what I mean...it was about who makes the payout and can go broke...the Provider certainly not.

So a Jammin Jars with real coincidence the win determined will produce sooner or later such an extreme case. Such a thing gets no operator in the boat that is sane without securing.

Also here we write past each other....it is clear nevertheless that this play cannot run with coincidence.

This post has been translated automatically

B****3
Hello, but if an extreme case occurs, no one needs to be liable, because the casino can say that it was a system error. Think recently Happy Halloween on 5 euros

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
There is no longer a "Casino" category on Twitch.

Instead, there are now "Slots" "Real Money Games". The normal Poker category is still there.

This post has been translated automatically

Latino
Experienced
It was probably only a matter of time when you saw how many streams with viewbots and chatbots flooded the category. I'm curious if this development will continue in the slots category.
Hmm see there just Casinodad - goes there with the bots directly further ...

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Latino wrote on 12/16/2018 at 09:46: I guess it was only a matter of time seeing how many streams with viewbots and chatbots flooded the category. Am curious if this development will continue in the slots category.
Hmm see there just Casinodad - goes there with the bots directly further ...

Bots use many streamers, the category probably does not play a big role.
Why the casino category was removed I do not know yet. However, it is possible to take e.g. slots as a category.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics23rd Dec. 2024 at 09:27 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately