That's it for casinos and streamers

GambleJoe Cookies
Providers:	GJ International Limited
	Cookie name:	PHPSESSID
	Purpose:	This cookie is created by an application based on PHP. The purpose of this cookie is to recognise the user.
	Cookie lifetime:	24 months
	Cookie name:	sid
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to assign personal configuration data.
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months
	Cookie name:	gjcook[ver]
	Purpose:	Version of the saved privacy setting
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months
	Cookie name:	gjcook[stat]
	Purpose:	Configuration of statistic cookies
	Cookie lifetime:	12 month
	Cookie name:	identifier
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to automatically log in when using the "Stay logged in" feature.
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months
	Cookie name:	securitytoken
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to automatically login when using the "stay signed in" feature.
	Cookie lifetime:	12 months

Google Analytics
Providers:	Google Ireland Limited
Data protection decl.:	https://policies.google.com/privacy
	Cookie name:	_ga
	Purpose:	Collection of statistics on the website usage. (Measurement of the range)
	Cookie lifetime:	24 months
	Cookie name:	_gid
	Purpose:	This cookie is used to collect user statistics for the website.
	Cookie lifetime:	24 hours
	Cookie name:	_gat
	Purpose:	Used to throttle the request rate.
	Cookie lifetime:	0

K****t

Forum posts: 688 Member has been banned

13th Oct. 2018, at 11:43 am CEST#211

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Tropper wrote on 10/13/2018 at 11:22 am
I totally agree with you on this one. So the chance of getting the following winning picture as in the case of Shirox and casino daddy is 1: in 1.3 million according to Provider

The following questions I ask myself:
Where did he get the number, is it even valid enough? (Is exactly the same when Mc Donalds says to me that the meat that is in the burger is 100% beef and all are free-range cattle) Trilatrulala everything is beautiful...

The provider generates money on mass with the shitty slot, it's about many millions, why does he give us as "transparency" the chance?

Second question I ask myself is: I need 1.3 million spins to get the same picture?
So if I make 500,000 spins, the chance is greater right?

Who tells me that I won't hit the same images again? So like a coin, I flip 5 heads before a number comes up on the 6th flip?
Is it really the case that I have 1.3 million different images and the image I have already drawn does not come again?

Is it really the case, for example, that if I roll 1.4 million times, the images will only repeat themselves? We speak of randomness and that is for me quite clearly a sign that EVERYTHING IS PROGRAMMED.

If All Slots run like this, then I should soon get full screen explorers at BOD, as often as I play this... hahahahaha

Of course it is programmed.

As also stated in the video, the win is fixed from the moment the Jam Jars drop.

This post has been translated automatically

Rookie

pascalst

Forum posts: 58 Member since: 02.09.2018

That's it for casinos and streamers

13th Oct. 2018, at 11:58 am CEST#212

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Coffee Light wrote on 10/13/2018 at 11:32 AM
--messages were removed by a moderator--

Sorry, that was from Tropper. Is from the communicator, he wrote this to me yesterday.
And also this:

--messages removed by a moderator-- 22:36

Okay, where do I start there? "Mimimi" in response to my statement and "you'll be banned soon" because your opinion bothers me.

A very adult attitude. Fellow Tropper is hopefully aware that gambling is only 18+?

This post has been translated automatically

Top Member

Tropper

Forum posts: 553 Member since: 29.09.2016

That's it for casinos and streamers

13th Oct. 2018, at 12:28 pm CEST#213

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

pascalst wrote on 10/13/2018 at 11:58 am
Okay, where do I start? "Mimimi" in response to my statement and "you will be banned soon" because your opinion bothers me.

A very adult attitude. Fellow Tropper is hopefully aware that gambling is only 18 and over?

Nice of you to just post our conversations in here without my permission. We wrote, I wanted to know why you are so cynical. What you have against me and what is going on with you. That's why, so as not to move everything into this thread, I wrote to you. The thing with Dreamcatcher was an example, on another thread (not here) it was brought up once and it was just an example.

It's really getting to be enough with you, where do you think you are here? I do not know Kaffelicht, he is a user who has a similar opinion as me. For privacy reasons alone, you should not post anything here without my permission. If you use it against me, I will complain to the admins. This is what I tell you!!!!

This post has been translated automatically

K****t

Forum posts: 688 Member has been banned

That's it for casinos and streamers

13th Oct. 2018, at 12:37 pm CEST#214

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

pascalst, look here.
Private messages may not be published without permission.
Even if it would be allowed, such an action is just low.
It should be a warning to everyone to exchange private messages with you.

https://www.morgenpost.de/web-wissen/web-technik/article212605843/Private-Nachrichten-von-anderen-nicht-veroeffentlichen.html

This post has been translated automatically

Rookie

pascalst

Forum posts: 58 Member since: 02.09.2018

That's it for casinos and streamers

13th Oct. 2018, at 12:48 pm CEST#215

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Tropper wrote on 10/13/2018 at 12:28 PM
Nice of you to just post our conversations in here without my permission. We wrote, I wanted to know why you are so cynical. What you have against me and what is wrong with you. That's why, not to move everything into this thread, I wrote to you. The thing with Dreamcatcher was an example, on another thread (not here) it was brought up once and it was just an example.

It's really getting to be enough with you, where do you think you are here? I do not know Kaffelicht, he is a user who has a similar opinion as me. For privacy reasons alone, you should not post anything here without my permission. If you use it against me, I will complain to the admins. This is what I tell you!!!!

That's not true. You threatened me with a ban if I say something to your posts again that you don't like.
Such behavior should not be tolerated in any forum. And certainly not when it comes from a conspiracy theorist who writes such things:

--messages removed by moderator-- . 10/12/2018 - 10:59pm

Yeah right, all casinos have the same owner. LMAO!

This post has been translated automatically

Top Member

sonne10

Forum posts: 830 Member since: 29.11.2017

That's it for casinos and streamers

13th Oct. 2018, at 12:52 pm CEST#216

1 Like

Liked this post: sonne10

will be tarred and feathered here

This post has been translated automatically

K****t

Forum posts: 688 Member has been banned

That's it for casinos and streamers

13th Oct. 2018, at 12:54 pm CEST#217

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

pascalst wrote on 10/13/2018 at 12:48 PM
Yes right, all casinos have the same owner. LMAO!

Still, you can't post private messages without the other person's permission.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Former Member

That's it for casinos and streamers

13th Oct. 2018, at 01:00 pm CEST#218

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

In case anyone is interested, the law of small and large numbers in relation to an RNG.
I'll use the Jammin-Jars game as an example, where this particular win had a probability of 1.3 million.
Assume the RNG has a range of values from 0 to 1,300,000.

The law of small numbers states that within a rotation, some numbers will not hit and some will occur multiple times.
In plain language, this means that after 1,300,000 spins, for example, this corresponding win did not occur at all, or was even hit multiple times.
Assuming this is a maximum residual that has not appeared within 3 rotations (3,900,000 spins), sooner or later the balance will come, since according to the law of large numbers the relative frequency is balanced for all numbers, if one would consider a correspondingly large rotation set. The problem here, however, is that this balance can also arise only after 100 rotations or even later.

In short, this win can occur 10 times within a rotation (but that would be an extreme favorite, and the rotation in the example refers to 1,300,000 spins), or not at all.

This post has been translated automatically

Rookie

pascalst

Forum posts: 58 Member since: 02.09.2018

That's it for casinos and streamers

13th Oct. 2018, at 01:01 pm CEST#219

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Coffee Light wrote on 10/13/2018 at 12:54 PM
Still, you can't post private messages without the other person's permission.

May be true. But the guy threatened me pretty aggressively and everyone is allowed to know that.
If I hadn't included what he wrote in my comment, maybe no one would believe me.

This post has been translated automatically

K****t

Forum posts: 688 Member has been banned

That's it for casinos and streamers

13th Oct. 2018, at 01:09 pm CEST#220

0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Emulator wrote on 10/13/2018 at 13:00: In case anyone is interested, the law of small and large numbers in relation to an RNG.
I'll use the Jammin-Jars game as an example, where that particular win had a probability of 1.3 million.
Assume the RNG has a range of values from 0 to 1,300,000.

The law of small numbers states that within a rotation, some numbers will not hit and some will occur multiple times.
In plain language, this means that after 1,300,000 spins, for example, this corresponding win did not occur at all, or was even hit multiple times.
Assuming this is a maximum residual that has not appeared within 3 rotations (3,900,000 spins), sooner or later the balance will come, since according to the law of large numbers the relative frequency is balanced for all numbers, if one would consider a correspondingly large rotation set. The problem here, however, is that this balance can also arise only after 100 rotations or even later.

In short, this win can occur 10 times within a rotation (but that would be an extreme favorite, and the rotation in the example refers to 1,300,000 spins), or not at all.

However, it is not about the number, i.e. the multiplication and the win obtained with it, but about the identical picture.
That x1600 wins can occur more often is not so unlikely. But then the winning pictures would have to be different for such a slot.

This post has been translated automatically

Other Casino games: That's it for casinos and streamers (Page 22)

That's it for casinos and streamers

That's it for casinos and streamers

That's it for casinos and streamers

That's it for casinos and streamers

That's it for casinos and streamers

That's it for casinos and streamers

That's it for casinos and streamers

That's it for casinos and streamers

That's it for casinos and streamers

That's it for casinos and streamers

Best Online Casinos

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 05:38 pm CET

Aristocrat receives first licence for slot machines in the ...

Impending ceiling collapse at historic Swiss ...

DGGS: The top-selling slots in October ...

GambleJoe Team

Community Forum-Moderators

Forgotten your password?