Other Casino games: That's it for casinos and streamers (Page 16)

Stromberg wrote on 11/10/2018 at 18:56
Now just neutrally the question:
Are these puns from you? To express that the official representation is actually the absurd?
Because purely from the definition of the word, it is that the theory that contradicts the official account is called a conspiracy theory. And not the official account or theory, even if it deals with a conspiracy ( in this case the attack on the US).

Just so there is no misunderstanding.

This post has been translated automatically

Coffee Light wrote on 10/11/2018 at 7:06 pm
Right, and that's exactly how you talk.
If you are not a Reichsbürger, then don't argue like them. Problem solved.

I have no ambitions whatsoever to discuss lying press and conspiracy theories with right-wingers who take alleged insults but throw insults and put-downs themselves in every post.
Besides, I don't want to be used by you to bring your confused hypotheses into the public. Over and over again you come up with your lying press convoluted topics, no matter what it is about, and try spasmodically to assert yourself and spread your ideas here.
You use every little opportunity to do so.

Please leave it alone with me, my time is simply too valuable.
Loosen up and get back to the topic, is much better.

This post has been translated automatically

Random wrote on 10/11/2018 at 7:14 pm
How do Reich citizens argue then?

But you just confirm what I wrote before.
You don't have a single argument. Instead you steer the conversation in completely different directions.

But we can come back to the topic
You represent the conspiracy theory that is cheated in Online Casinos
Then you also believe in the reptiloids, right?

Can you at least bring facts and arguments to the topic?
Or is it enough just to shout loud enough?

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Random wrote on 10/07/2018 at 11:11 pm
The only question is, by whom is it more unethical?
The streamers use so to speak only an offer what the casinos make available to them.
The main blame then lies clearly with the casinos.

Random wrote on 08/10/2018 at 01:32:
In principle you are right. But I see bans mostly critical. I am still of the opinion that every person must be responsible and learn to distinguish what is good for you and what is not.
That the streamers but a completely unreal image of gaming reproduce I think then also very questionable.

Maybe it would be the right approach not to try to sue the casinos, but to start there that have the casinos theoretically under control, such as the MGA

Maybe we should send letters of complaint to the relevant EU Commission and the relevant authorities in Malta and point out that most casinos operate unethical and deliberately misleading business practices (bonus rules, payout delays, etc.) and this is not compatible with the consumer protection of the EU and the state of Malta. And all this happens only because the MGA allows this, even promotes it.
That here thus a supervisory authority is even more or less involved in illegal machinations and thus commercial fraud takes place and the MGA can actually already be considered a criminal organization.
This may sound harsh but it is exactly the case. Any company with such practices would have been closed down in Germany long ago.

I think it's good if we all write to the UK Gambling Commission together and I will support that, but I see streamers only as a symptom and the real culprits sit somewhere else. Streamers are only part of the big picture.

Random wrote on 08/10/2018 at 03:35:
Hello Ankor

I understand your point of view as well.

Only, the more violently bans are enforced, the more organized crime grows in this area, with even more unpleasant consequences for the weak. Nobody really wants to have gambling debts with some gangster.

In addition, I believe that these (let's call them no longer so pejoratively weak) more vulnerable would then perhaps flee into another addiction. This is also called addiction shifting, because all addictions have a common origin, so to speak. For a susceptible person the real problem is never the gambling, the drugs, the alcohol, the porn, whatever, but he/she him/herself, how one deals with problems, perceives one's environment, one had a stupid childhood, deficits in personality development, etc.. The problem then just expresses itself, and thus shows itself obviously just in the form of gambling addiction.

If we had a supervisory authority that, in my opinion, would not act so criminally, then we would have much fewer problems here as well. For example, one could prohibit the casinos that they provide streamers prefabricated win videos.
So bans in general no, but a whitewash or let's say a false pretence, also no

Random wrote on 09/10/2018 at 19:50
No point with the pascal or whatever his name is. A troll who doesn't know the first thing about math and statistics. How can anyone take him seriously?

A few thousand spins and several times x 1000 win factor.
Yes, it is clear.

This post has been translated automatically

Coffee Light wrote on 10/11/2018 at 7:28 pm: In light of Random's insinuation that I'm just shouting loudly and seeing conspiracies from OCs, here are a few quotes from him describing just that from him:





Random, stand by what you write and don't go into opposition every time it's about your favorite right-wing topic in hopes of discrediting others.

This post has been translated automatically

Random wrote on 11/10/2018 at 19:09
I wanted to represent how absurd the representation from the official side is. And after this was not supported with evidence, it is also just a conspiracy theory.
It is just the official politically correct.
But who switches on his common sense will recognize fast that the official explanations are more absurd and more fantastic than any conspiracy theory.
The laws of nature and physics should have been off that day.

The term conspiracy theory was invented by the CIA when doubts about the official reporting of the death of John F. Kennedy were raised.
Since then, this term has been used to discredit those who think differently. It is an ideological fighting term.

One uses for it among other things the same methods as it also Kaffeelicht makes.
One takes actual nonsense as for example the Flatearther or Reptiloiden believers and throws them a Pot with scientifically provable things like 9/11.
Or even the Reichsbürger. Whereby they do not even represent a conspiracy theory.

This post has been translated automatically

Random wrote on 10/11/2018 at 7:43 pm



The ridiculous thing is that you dismiss everything that does not fit into your worldview as a conspiracy theory and call everyone who believes in it a crank, but even here you adhere to the conspiracy theory that casinos cheat and anyone who disagrees with you as a crank.
Do you notice what?

This post has been translated automatically

Coffee Light wrote on 10/11/2018 at 7:59 pm
Nope, I've never called anyone here a crank who doesn't believe there is fraud in casinos.
Somehow you have a bit of a bad dream sometimes, don't you?
Please cite once where I called someone a crank or similar who doesn't believe in casino fraud.
I am curious.

Where you contradict yourself?
On the one hand you call the MGA a criminal organization and talk about fraud in OCs, call for us to write letters of complaint to all responsible.
On the other hand, you accuse me of seeing fraud everywhere in OCs
Please decide.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically