Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Who has experience with Wiliam Hill (Page 2)

Topic created on 23rd Dec. 2019 | Page: 2 of 2 | Answers: 12 | Views: 3,844
Christoph
Experienced
MarcT22186 wrote on 23.12.2019 at 09:00
Isn't it actually rather the case that the licenses of the Isle of Man and Gibraltar, in terms of pure Player protection or even preventive guidelines such as the extremely strict advertising requirement, are nevertheless a lot better than those of the mga?

On paper, the arbitration procedure of the mga is of course initially easier and more comfortable, but as long as they do not have the ass in the pants to sanction times, this is but rather nothing worth!
The best example of this are the playcherry casinos, which should actually no longer have licenses, because they even quite obviously violate the regulations (of the mga) to obtain a license.

The licensing requirements of the Isle of Man or Gibraltar are not as strict as those of the UK Gambling Commission. Therefore, in my opinion, the advertising requirements are not as strict as one is used to from the British licenses


So far, I have only been able to gain experience with William Hill with the implementation of the specifications from the Gibraltar licenses. At least in terms of player protection, I know the following about William Hill:

The online casino is partly notorious among some players with higher wins, as they have dragged out payouts a bit in the past due to unusual document requests. I have only heard this from some players and read it in reviews (among other things, not only pictures of IDs are requested, but sometimes also selfies with various documents).

I myself had been temporarily banned by William Hill a year ago (for an article) because of inquiries about player protection (I had the same problem at CasinoCruise). Even though I had not deposited there for months, they were suddenly afraid that I was a gambling addict. However, opening the accounts didn't take 5 minutes. Only 2 questions were asked (that's when I got to know a clearly extensive procedure for player protection at Mr Green and LeoVegas, with waiting times of at least a week). If I had really been addicted to gambling, this would not have stopped me from gambling.

Accordingly, at least in practice, I cannot understand that the licensing requirements are really stricter and stricter

I don't want to defend the MGA, as a tougher approach against providers who behave improperly would sometimes be desirable. Nevertheless, once again, I would like to point out that the MGA also suspends licenses in very rare cases. Unfortunately, they are not as open as the UK GC when it comes to dealing with cases:

https://www.gamblejoe.com/news/malta-gaming-authority-zieht-lizenzen-zurueck/

@Spontimonti:

Could one reason for not finding William Hill through the search function be that you misspelled the Provider (see thread title)?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Christoph wrote on 23.12.2019 at 19:40
The licensing requirements of the Isle of Man or Gibraltar are not as strict as from the UK Gambling Commission. Therefore, in my opinion, the advertising requirements are not as strict as one is used to from the UK licenses otherwise


So far, I have only been able to gain experience with William Hill with the implementation of the specifications from the Gibraltar licenses. At least in terms of Player protection, I know the following about William Hill:

The online casino is partly notorious among some players with higher wins, as they have dragged out payouts a bit in the past due to unusual document requests. I have only heard this from some players and read it in reviews (among other things, not only pictures of IDs are requested, but sometimes also selfies with various documents).

I myself had been temporarily banned by William Hill a year ago (for an article) because of inquiries about player protection (I had the same problem at CasinoCruise). Even though I had not deposited there for months, they were suddenly afraid that I was a gambling addict. However, opening the accounts didn't take 5 minutes. Only 2 questions were asked (that's when I got to know a clearly extensive procedure for player protection at Mr Green and LeoVegas, with waiting times of at least a week). If I had really been addicted to gambling, this would not have stopped me from gambling.

Accordingly, at least in practice, I cannot understand that the licensing requirements are really stricter and stricter

I don't want to defend the MGA, as a tougher approach against providers who behave improperly would sometimes be desirable. Nevertheless, once again, I would like to point out that the MGA also suspends licenses in very rare cases. Unfortunately, they are not as open as the UK GC when it comes to dealing with cases:

https://www.gamblejoe.com/news/malta-gaming-authority-zieht-lizenzen-zurueck/

@Spontimonti:

Could one reason for not finding William Hill through the search function be that you misspelled the Provider (see thread title)?

I will try my luck through the testimonials here, which are all quite good. The problem with the search is actually so, I thought one writes so how stupid of me lol. I'm interested in the Verification process, especially since I like to be verified first at reputable OC before I become active in gambling. So I have then my peace. But I do not know if I would find it good to send them any selfies of me that I think is absolutely pointless

This post has been translated automatically

sigi36
Amateur
Spontimonti wrote on 23.12.2019 at 05:13: Find here nothing at all about it have me da grad registered because it offers my favorite slots but have something with Gibraltar read. Good? Bad? Experience reports please.

Hello,

I don't play there anymore but William Hill is the only casino that has made losses with me. Long story short:
Deposit: under 50
Withdrawal after bonus conversion after about 2h about 3.500€
All in one night from the initial registration to the payout then still on PayPal account passed no 6h including Verification!
So I can only recommend William Hill


Ciao

Sigi

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics27th Dec. 2024 at 04:19 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately