Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: What do you understand by player protection (Page 2)

Topic created on 16th Oct. 2020 | Page: 2 of 2 | Answers: 17 | Views: 4,075
Anonym
Player protection

- Prohibition of minors from participating in gambling of any kind

End

As a responsible person, I should be allowed to make my own decisions, but now I am being regulated under the pretext of "player protection"
I make a decision and have to live with the consequences, that's life
If I now go to the casino in Bad Zwischenahn and lose my entire fortune there, the state is not interested either
Why doesn't it care, because it has been earning money for a long time
In the same way, I can "gamble away" my entire fortune on the stock market and the state is not interested.
The only thing the state wants to protect in this case with the (possibly) coming law are its monopolies - casinos and the state lottery

German licenses and German legislation could have given more protection to the player (maybe they will conditionally).
But if this was about "player protection", why were issues like "payout processes", "identical payout duration", "identical bonus conditions" and a whole backpack full of other issues that would have been important for us players not addressed as aggressively as the cuts we now have to bear?

Before someone now comes to pull the club over my head, yes, my views are very selfish, I am aware of that
I am also aware that there are problematic players who gamble away their house, yard and entire fortune, and in some cases not only harm themselves, but also their families
Sad
However, life works just so, you make decisions and have to live with the consequences, positive, as negative.
I personally have not yet experienced that if I make a wrong decision as a responsible person, the state rings at my front door to hold me (in good German), the hand before the ass
A few years ago, I blindly "gambled" on the stock market and lost good money, father state has not held me the hand in front of the ass, the consequences I had to bear alone and could now, in the middle of the night, funny further my entire fortune there "gamble" and the state would not be interested

For me, the topic of "gambling protection" is a fairy tale

Greetings to the round



This post has been translated automatically

Z****3
gamble1 wrote on 17.10.2020 at 01:41: I find the simple panic button good and sensible there is nothing to complain about

The 1000 € limit I find only ok if it is eg. so regulated 1000 € possible for everyone everything above must be documented that it does not ruin one so that everyone can just play according to his possibilities and for all those who do not want to submit documents would have to be just 1,000 € enough

That would be for me a protection

For me, however, is definitely not a protection if by betting restrictions any possibility of larger profits is taken I mean Hello they write us before we may play 1000 € in the month then it should be completely uninteresting whether you gamble away these 1000 € on 1 € 2 € or 100 € especially since you also do not reach the limit if you pay out wins but only if you have a pure loss of 1000 € in the month

The same if I 1000 € in the month may play I can gamble away with headstand autostart or with my feet that makes me therefore also not addicted than the fact that I give away 1000 € in the month

Germany seems to be with their obviously nonsensical regulations slowly so brazen that they do not even try to disguise that these planned things are not for Player protection there (examples are above) but simply to cash and the chance of huge wins to prevent

It has already worked well with Tr.5 there have also only the fewest noticed (fortunately I am one of the lucky ones) that everything is not the protection but only the even more brazen rip-off serves without chances of wins and because no one has itched they try exactly the same online

Who has then with the 1000 euro limit no more chance on larger wins?????? The 10 people who are cut down on the chance and the 100 who are saved from losing that is clearly player protection. Or do you want to say out of 10000 players 5000 have the chance to win big and 5000 have the chance to win small???? Any cap, even to 50 euros would be statistically player protection.

2nd paragraph.... Convenience is addictive....if you press autostart you do not play yourself...if you satisfy your husband (are yes self-confessed homosexual) yourself at your own will or just a stable humming dildo....makes no difference or? (Comparison should be allowed we are in a 18+ forum). Or is there a difference after all? Subject win rate...with some game providers Umdrehungscounter up in the corner....The faster you turn the lower the chance of a free game.....Bsp. Provider says every 650 revolutions a free game. Now there is a normal clicker and a car player....Who invests more????

TR5 is corrosive in the eyes of gambling addicts ( like I was/eventually am)....fact is...loss of control.....I am inne Spielo 20 euro pure recharge, smoking,,,,rushed down.....now at 2.30 recharge I am more intensely connected to the recharge and the machine.....fact 1....i lose less i inevitably get more involved in the recharge process i am more aware....fact 2 chances of winning....i can't make any statement...who plays permanently always loses....tr5 bank statements show less minus last year than the years before......

but when people like you argue against it and then also talk against onlineregulations...it means only one thing you are in on the earnings....

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon
Zeus123 wrote on 17.10.2020 at 02:48
With the 1000 euro limit who has no more chance of bigger wins?????? The 10 people who are cut down on the chance and the 100 who are saved from losing that is clearly player protection. Or do you want to say out of 10000 players 5000 have the chance to win big and 5000 have the chance to win small???? Any cap, even to 50 euros would be statistically player protection.

2nd paragraph.... Convenience is addictive....if you press autostart you do not play yourself...if you satisfy your husband (are yes self-confessed homosexual) yourself at your own will or just a stable humming dildo....makes no difference or? (Comparison should be allowed we are in a 18+ forum). Or is there a difference after all? Subject win rate...with some game providers Umdrehungscounter up in the corner....The faster you turn the lower the chance of a free game.....Bsp. Provider says every 650 revolutions a free game. Now there is a normal clicker and a car player....Who invests more????

TR5 is corrosive in the eyes of gambling addicts ( like I was/eventually am)....fact is...loss of control.....I am inne Spielo 20 euro pure recharge, smoking,,,,rushed down.....now at 2.30 recharge I am more intensely connected to the recharge and the machine.....fact 1....i lose less i inevitably get more involved in the recharge process i am more aware....fact 2 chances of winning....i can't make any statement...who plays permanently always loses....tr5 bank statements show less minus last year than the years before......

but when people like you argue against it and then also talk against onlineregulations...it means only one thing you are in on the earnings....


1) I have not the 1000 € limit explained to the reason but the 1 € lock because I am the opinion if one can gamble away already 1k then please also as I would like and fact is simply that it rarely occurs on 1 € times 10k + to win as on 5 or 10 €

2) I personally have not experienced anyone who says he is addicted because the program does everything automatically it is rather so that most people on autostart are not even active in the game but make coffee, make food, etc.. and in the Spielo it is also still allowed whether now by tricks or tolerated is put to one side

How you come to the point with gay does not quite open to me but vill I have also just read over something at the time because I can transfer that to zero % on me

3) Tr.5 Is corrosive in the eye of the players I know the accounting of the boxes from before and today the people lose more than ever before Tr. is good for the operators that wass also just as 3 hours break

Imagine there is a player who loses a lot before he could play relaxed now he gets scared because soon break is and he puts the stakes up to get some money back and the box rattles everything down because preferably they are empty when the break arrives gladly

You can see that yourself, can't you? It is already for years in such a way that with telephone profit plays and even with the Teleshopping customers may not be won with time pressure neither by a number the Suggeriert that soon everything is sold out nor by a countdown which expires because time pressure impairs the perception

Already on the basis of this example one cannot believe the government in the point Player protection a word or it were simply "experts at it which have zero plan which triggers addiction"

I make no secret of the fact that I get a not insignificant part of the cake but you forget one important point I am not an untouchable futzi who laughs at everyone because they lose their money and who chills his life in his mansion I am also a player like everyone here and know both sides of the coin so I can say that everyone is just being fooled with these "player protection arguments"

I'm the last one against protection but then it should please bring something and what DE does no matter if in arcades or now Oc's just brings no one what except the state

More people in the casinos by scaring away from Oc's and Spielos and for the morons who still go there there are also 3 times taxes for the state

So that's it now from me just wanted to make it clear

This post has been translated automatically

Z****3
gamble1 wrote on 17.10.2020 at 04:06
1) I have not declared the 1000 € limit to the reason but the 1 € lock because I am of the opinion if one can gamble away already 1k then please also as I would like and fact is simply that it rarely occurs on 1 € times 10k + to win as on 5 or 10 €

2) I personally have not experienced anyone who says he is addicted because the program does everything automatically it is rather so that most people on autostart are not even active in the game but make coffee, make food, etc.. and in the Spielo it is also still allowed whether now by tricks or tolerated is put to one side

How you come to the point with gay does not quite open to me but vill I have also just read over something at the time because I can transfer that to zero % on me

3) Tr.5 Is corrosive in the eye of the players I know the accounting of the boxes from before and today the people lose more than ever before Tr. is good for the operators that wass also just as 3 hours break

Imagine there is a player who loses a lot before he could play relaxed now he gets scared because soon break is and he puts the stakes up to get some money back and the box rattles everything down because preferably they are empty when the break arrives gladly

You can see that yourself, can't you? It is already for years in such a way that with telephone profit plays and even with the Teleshopping customers may not be won with time pressure neither by a number the Suggeriert that soon everything is sold out nor by a countdown which expires because time pressure impairs the perception

Already on the basis of this example one cannot believe the government in the point Player protection a word or it were simply "experts at it which have zero plan which triggers addiction"

I make no secret of the fact that I get a not insignificant part of the pie but you forget an important point I am not an untouchable Futzi who laughs at everyone because they lose their money and who chills his life in his mansion I am also a player like everyone here and know both sides of the coin so I can say that everyone is just fooled with these "player protection arguments"

I'm the last one against protection but then it should please bring something and what DE does no matter if in arcades or now Oc's just brings no one what except the state

More people in the casinos by scaring away from Oc's and Spielos and for the morons who still go there there are also 3 times taxes for the state

So that was it now also from me just wanted to make it clear

Paragraph 1....1 Euro lockdown PER LINE...that means you can easily play 5 Euro stake....so don't tell crap. It does not mean 1 euro per turn. Even right now (now I pause) I play 2 euro per turn on 10 lines

Paragraph 2....this has to do with self-reflection...many go into gambling houses and go through the same behavior patterns...Good day....1 coffee...a cigarette and recharge and bang money away.....that's what the 2.30 euro clicks are about....the consciousness what one makes....instead of...20 euro purely coffee Tip and away is the crap just 7 times click...the hopeless ones ballern anyway everything purely however with some clicks and they remain far....do not question all regulations only because you and your friend circle seem omniscient....


Paragraph 3....felt everyone can claim what...fact is...there were the big gambling house players who 1000 euros were indifferent....5 machines f**k it...this rip-off is a stop...right so.....any change is always bad...felt less payout.....may be because the rip-off of the big has an end

And to the topic state everyone of citizens of the state win erziehlt must pay 40% capital gains tax...Only right any Finanzdienstleiser which turn only money in the Inet.... From therefore all Quertreiber from abroad should be switched off. Parasieten gibts in the animal world...in the financial world they belong switched off from me for life.

ps.as a critical discussion to consider!

This post has been translated automatically

DerLorax
Experienced
gamble1 wrote on 17.10.2020 at 04:06 Clock
How you come to the point with gay is not quite clear to me but vill I also just read over something at the time because I can transfer that to zero % on me

Maybe he confused you with me because we both chose this tuff turquoise background 💅😆😆

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon
DerLorax wrote on 10/17/2020 at 07:55 AM
Maybe he mistook you for me because we both chose that tuff turquoise background 💅😆😆

That would be possible haha

This post has been translated automatically

Niroht
Experienced
Matthlign wrote on 10/17/2020 at 02:21: Player Protection

- Prohibit minors from participating in gambling of any kind

End

As a responsible person, I should be allowed to make my own decisions, but now I am being regulated under the pretext of "player protection"
I make a decision and have to live with the consequences, that's life
If I now go to the casino in Bad Zwischenahn and lose my entire fortune there, the state is not interested either
Why doesn't it care, because it has been earning money from it for a long time
In the same way, I can "gamble away" my entire fortune on the stock market and the state is not interested.
The only thing the state wants to protect in this case with the (possibly) coming law are its monopolies - casinos and the state lottery

German licenses and German legislation could have given more protection to the player (maybe they will conditionally).
But if this was about "player protection", why were issues like "payout processes", "identical payout duration", "identical bonus conditions" and a whole backpack full of other issues that would have been important for us players not addressed as aggressively as the cuts we now have to bear?

Before someone now comes to pull the club over my head, yes, my views are very selfish, I am aware of that
I am also well aware that there are problematic players who gamble away their house, yard and entire fortune and sometimes not only harm themselves, but also their families
Sad
However, life works just so, you make decisions and have to live with the consequences, positive, as negative.
I personally have not yet experienced that if I make a wrong decision as a responsible person, the state rings at my front door to hold me (in good German), the hand before the ass
A few years ago, I blindly "gambled" on the stock market and lost good money, father state has not held me the hand in front of the ass, the consequences I had to bear alone and could now, in the middle of the night, funny further my entire fortune there "gamble" and the state would not be interested

For me, the topic of "gambling protection" is a fairy tale

Greetings to the round




Good contribution, I can agree with you on all points and see it the same 👏👍.
It is also immediately noticeable that in important points such as payout, payout duration, bonus conditions, etc. little to no energy was used to create uniform regulations. And this lack of commitment clearly suggests to me that "player protection" is only used as a cover for completely different interests

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon
Matthlign wrote on 10/17/2020 at 02:21: Player Protection

- Prohibit minors from participating in gambling of any kind

End

As a responsible person, I should be allowed to make my own decisions, but now I am being regulated under the pretext of "player protection"
I make a decision and have to live with the consequences, that's life
If I now go to the casino in Bad Zwischenahn and lose my entire fortune there, the state is not interested either
Why doesn't it care, because it has been earning money for a long time
In the same way, I can "gamble away" my entire fortune on the stock market and the state is not interested.
The only thing the state wants to protect in this case with the (possibly) coming law are its monopolies - casinos and the state lottery

German licenses and German legislation could have given more protection to the player (maybe they will conditionally).
But if this was about "player protection", why were issues like "payout processes", "identical payout duration", "identical bonus conditions" and a whole backpack full of other issues that would have been important for us players not addressed as aggressively as the cuts we now have to bear?

Before someone now comes to pull the club over my head, yes, my views are very selfish, I am aware of that
I am also well aware that there are problematic players who gamble away their house, yard and entire fortune and sometimes not only harm themselves, but also their families
Sad
However, life works just so, you make decisions and have to live with the consequences, positive, as negative.
I personally have not yet experienced that if I make a wrong decision as a responsible person, the state rings at my front door to hold me (in good German), the hand before the ass
A few years ago, I blindly "gambled" on the stock market and lost good money, father state has not held me the hand in front of the ass, the consequences I had to bear alone and could now, in the middle of the night, funny further my entire fortune there "gamble" and the state would not be interested

For me, the topic of "gambling protection" is a fairy tale

Greetings to the round




That is exactly what I also think Player protection is important that can not be denied because there are many who can not think clearly due to the disease but then at the same time also their own variations of it must be regulated

It starts already everyone who is 18 can gamble where he wants a few arcades and casinos are from 21 but many arcades just not that you could also like to increase to 24 to have the mental maturity and a small financial cushion

But as you said everything in which the state earns almost only alone is ok as it is and everything else where he has to share is regulated broken according to the motto we collect something and if it goes wrong it is just so

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics27th Dec. 2024 at 06:44 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately