Online Casinos in general: Videoslots and the RTP value (Page 14)

ChillEffect wrote on 10/18/2020 at 07:59 AM
There is no real coincidence. It is a pseudo-coincidence.

Generally, in computability theory, one defines as pseudorandom , which cannot be predicted by efficient algorithms . pseudorandomness but is still computable (you can generate it efficiently), just not predictable.


The most important application of pseudorandomness are the so-called random number generators , which are available in practically all programming languages . The fact that these are mostly just pseudo random number generators (PRNG) is often overlooked. They generate a sequence of numbers , which looks random , but is not, because it is calculated by a deterministic algorithm . Each time the random number calculation is started with the same initial value, called seed (English seed), the same pseudo-random sequence of numbers is generated.

And please nik spare me such phrases as: you can also play book of dead with 1 billion spins and not even get 1000x.
I have never heard a bigger bullshit
I didn't know at that moment if I should laugh or be ashamed...

The term Markow chain should also google times...

This post has been translated automatically

Nik89 wrote on 18.10.2020 at 08:37
Maybe someone else will try to explain it to you even easier though it falls on deaf ears anyway. I gave it my all and give up

This post has been translated automatically

fortnite wrote on 10/17/2020 at 23:38

One of the most misinterpretation of RTP I have ever heard.

Your version assumes that only you all alone in the world plays this game, and then the slot
has to spit out something at some point

But since a lot of people play this game, it is possible that others win all the time and you only lose.
You don't even notice other wins

Apart from that, what Kanalmalocher says is correct. You always have the same
Chances. Namely very small on a win, and very large on no win.

If you have a winning series, it is (hopefully) pure coincidence, but nothing more.
If one would go after you, one would have every time a high win, thus the Slots would be
calculating. But they are not.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

ChillEffect wrote on 10/18/2020 at 07:59 AM
There is no real coincidence. It is a pseudo-coincidence.

Generally, in computability theory, one defines as pseudorandom , which cannot be predicted by efficient algorithms . pseudorandomness , however, is still computable (you can generate it efficiently), just not predictable.


The most important application of pseudorandomness are the so-called random number generators , which are available in practically all programming languages . The fact that these are mostly just pseudo random number generators (PRNG) is often overlooked. They generate a sequence of numbers , which looks random , but is not, because it is calculated by a deterministic algorithm . Each time the random number calculation is started with the same initial value, called seed (English seed), the same pseudo-random sequence of numbers is generated.

And please nik spare me such phrases as: you can also play book of dead with 1 billion spins and not even get 1000x.
I have never heard a bigger bullshit
I didn't know at that moment if I should laugh or be embarrassed...

The term Markow chain should also google times...

This post has been translated automatically

Tobias wrote on 10-18-2020 at 12:25 PM
Why didn't you just post the link to the Wikipedia entry here....

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

ChillEffect wrote on 10/18/2020 at 08:58 AM
Tell me someone who calls himself fortnite 😂

Alright 👍

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically