Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Uniform blocking

Topic created on 19th Aug. 2019 | Page: 1 of 1 | Answers: 3 | Views: 1,895
j****1

Uniform blocking

19th Aug. 2019, at 01:33 pm CEST#1
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Hello together!

I found an older title from Christoph here, in which the MGA wants to implement a uniform
Blocking in all casinos with license MGA would like to implement, if one wants to be blocked in a casino
would like to be blocked. This was also already so
decided. How far is one then there, or on what depends that then? Was yes believe at the beginning of the
Year, or? And the idea is not bad.

Then the question of Verification, where there are often problems, and also affected me already.
Can you not when registering a minimum amount of, for example, a cent via instant Deposit,
Trustly etc deposit, and the casinos thus have all the data? Similar to the casinos without registration, where
all of which I have had very good experiences. Deposits and withdrawals were extremely
fast, you were verified with the deposit, and there was no stupid bonus garbage.

Clearly, you don't want to miss out on this so that funds are gambled away again, or funds are cancelled
because you have violated the bonus rules. But can't the MGA as the licensor
specify / prescribe? Otherwise there is no license. Or they are all in cahoots
In cahoots. If I were a licensor, I would know where most of the problems are, and I would
and would try to eliminate them.
We would also have less work, because of the less letters because of the non-paying for
for flimsy reasons

This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert
Expert

Uniform blocking

19th Aug. 2019, at 02:14 pm CEST#2
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
If players were the source of funding of the MGA + state subsidy would have (eg annually € 25 so that you can play in MGA casinos, verify once with MGA and done, the state then subsidizes for each player another € 25...) would certainly go more. Currently, the MGA earns on the wins of a casino with and in the award of licenses, the UKGC, on the other hand, earns a lot through the penalties that are awarded (therefore, the UKGC tends to overregulation to be able to collect more money).

The casinos are certainly doing something that could be compared to lobbying, because the MGA can set the rules if it wants to. Until something like this happens, years pass, if one would decide for it. Most recently, arbitration boards have been introduced to get rid of work, but when I look at what it takes on average to solve a problem ... (approx. 30-90 days), the fun goes out of it.

Playing online and always think at certain sums <Hoffentlich kommt jetzt nicht eine neue Anfrage>or <Hoffentlich geht es reibungslos durch>is very annoying, I know there is a small selection of casinos where it is rather unproblematic. But with the majority there are always huge problems from certain points for no reason. Each casino evaluates the same evidence differently and asks this at a different time, everything would be regulable by the MGA and yes in this the MGA and also the casinos has no interest. If there are problems then always to the disadvantage of the player, only with technical problems sometimes players benefit and then the players have also had bad luck in most cases.

If you Deposit and money does not appear almost nothing is done, you wait partly weeks. But if you get 15 € too much because you could still claim a bonus offer after the expiration of time then is acted in a flash. Immediately payout rejected, money is gone and the friendly text you were too late but you can choose one of the many other offers and you hope you enjoy his time + some hypocritical saying still on top like ( <Zögere nicht bei Problemen dich zu melden wir helfen dir gerne, damit du zufrieden bist geben wir jeden Tag mehr als 100 %!>usually some 25% 9000 Wager offer still as an advertising banner below)</Zögere>. <Zögere nicht bei Problemen dich zu melden wir helfen dir gerne, damit du zufrieden bist geben wir jeden Tag mehr als 100 %!>

//supplement: So original message from the MGA: https://www.mga.org.mt/malta-gaming-authority-to-launch-a-unified-self-exclusion-system-for-its-remote-gaming-licensees/

And the last news I was aware of: https://www.mga.org.mt/the-mga-publishes-a-preliminary-market-consultation-document-to-request-information-on-projects-for-a-unified-self-exclusion-system/</Zögere></Hoffentlich></Hoffentlich>

This post has been translated automatically

j****1

Uniform blocking

19th Aug. 2019, at 02:51 pm CEST#3
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
It sounds almost as if the "license fee" is a kind of protection money. The MGA then protects
its casinos from unpleasant regulations. In this sense, the MGA would not be a
serious authority. The few who really take the trouble to write to the MGA,
and the MGA can't help but decide against a casino

It is undisputed that the MGA knows the tricks of Verification and Bonuses, and tolerates them
tolerates them. Ergo, the MGA is out for the casinos, and not for the players, right?

This post has been translated automatically

Julian
Elite

Uniform blocking

19th Aug. 2019, at 03:57 pm CEST#4
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
The thread creator was banned because this was a user who had already been banned in the past.

Therefore, the thread is closed, should still be interested in discussing this topic then there is the possibility to create a new topic.

This topic was closed

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics27th Dec. 2024 at 02:06 am CET

Law
0
Online Casinos
0
Miscellaneous
0

GambleJoe Team

Profile picture of JulianJulian
Community-Manager / Complaint SpecialistProfile picture of CounterCounter
Software developerProfile picture of MatthiasMatthias
Project manager
Profile picture of DanielDaniel
Founder

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately