Topic created on 26th Mar. 2019 | Page: 3 of 5 | Answers: 41 | Views: 8,818
Anonym
Former Member
Together we can make it big.
26th Mar. 2019, at 08:43 pm CET#21
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Would also be there. Play anyway every few days with 200 and there I just leave it out just report if a plan comes about
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Together we can make it big.
26th Mar. 2019, at 09:01 pm CET#22
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Theone87 wrote on 03/26/2019 6:39 PM
That's exactly how it is. Unfortunately I have jitters to bet directly a few hundred on a game, strangely enough with slots but you gamble such sums down more often... actually stupid, but it's entertainment.
Calculate times 100 € bet on odds 1.2 which is relatively safe in a home game on the favorite as a win goes out are 120 € without tax calculated. Do the whole thing 10 times and you have over 600€ out (if you always go all in), then you pull 500€ out into your own pocket and start again..
You can also f**k up 1.2 odds but is rather unlikely if you do not just exotic leagues or amateurs tippst
You would probably be limited by the Provider with max 10 € bet ... I was limited at tipico after I have cleared once big. Is already 6-7 years ago.
I do not understand. With 100€ stake on a 1.2 odds you have won 20€ in case of success. Not 120€!
Theone87 wrote on 03/26/2019 6:39 PM
That's exactly how it is. Unfortunately I have jitters to bet directly a few hundred on a game, strangely enough with slots but you gamble such sums down more often... actually stupid, but it's entertainment.
Calculate times 100 € bet on odds 1.2 which is relatively safe in a home game on the favorite as a win goes out are 120 € without tax calculated. Do the whole thing 10 times and you have over 600€ out (if you always go all in), then you pull out 500€ in your own pocket and start again..
You can also f**k up 1.2 odds but is rather unlikely if you do not just exotic leagues or amateurs tippst
You would probably be limited by the Provider with max 10 € bet ... I was limited at tipico after I have cleared once big. Is already 6-7 years ago.
As unlikely as you make it, but it is not that one of the favorites zb only draw plays. A 1.2 reflects a probability of occurrence of about 83% or so, since the bookmaker still includes his margin, the actual probability assumed by the bookmaker is probably more like 70 to 75%.
And especially in the well-known leagues, they are usually not so wrong. That a game does not go through is quite likely
Or in other words: if you play 10 times always a 1.2 and always bet everything again, it comes out in this case about the same as if you play a 10er Combi with all selections a 1.2 er quote and bet your 100 euros. Then you have about a 6.1 odds and therefore a chance of 1 to 6. So much more likely to lose than to win.
Now you can maybe through your knowledge and research etc. a few of the games better estimate than the bookie and see a higher probability that the Tip goes through, but still it will be more likely that at least one game does not fit...
Stromberg wrote on 03/26/2019 at 21:18
But it is not as unlikely as you make it out to be, that one of the favorites e.g. only plays a draw. A 1.2 reflects a probability of occurrence of about 83%or so, since the bookmaker still includes his margin, the actual probability assumed by the bookmaker is probably more like 70 to 75%.
And especially in the well-known leagues, they are usually not so wrong. That a game does not go through is quite likely
Or put another way: if you play 10 times always a 1.2 and always bet everything again, it comes out in this case about the same as if you play a 10er Combi with all selections a 1.2 er quote and bet your 100 euros. Then you have about a 6.1 odds and thus about a 1 in 6 chance. So much more likely to lose than to win.
Now maybe through your knowledge and research etc. you can estimate a few of the games better than the bookie and see a higher probability that the Tip goes through, but still it will be more likely that at least one game does not fit...
Ultimately, everything is gambling and you are always at a disadvantage against casino or bookie. If you find a niche in the sports betting area, you certainly have the greatest chances to exploit odds, but whether I aneigne me know badminton or water polo probably not. If you want to go to soccer, I trust only known leagues in the high classes that there is at least little to no manipulation... you can certainly make money kn the Chinese 2nd league, but there are certainly many games pushed and would be too risky for me 😄
Theone87 wrote on 03/26/2019 at 21:26
At the end of the day everything is gambling and you are always at a disadvantage compared to casino or bookie. If you find a niche in the sports betting area, you certainly have the greatest chances to exploit odds, but whether I aneigne me know badminton or water polo probably not. If you want to go to soccer, since I Trau only known leagues in the high classes that there is at least little to no manipulation... you can certainly kn the Chinese 2nd league make money, but there are certainly many games pushed and would be too risky for me 😄
One could distribute to all for the 200 € are too much also simply shares. According to the motto, if something good comes is distributed in percent?
For example: A gives 200 €, B gives 100 €, C gives 20 € -> Total 320 € distributed to A 62.5%, B 31.25%, C 6.25%
The only question is who do you trust? For many, oneself or the Gamblejoe team is the only option, anyone else would be rightly distrusted as this happens everywhere all the time. My cousin left the family because of 150 € and broke off all contacts, and with sums like 4000 € not a few will have similar thoughts.
Example: I play alone and pay 200 euros, then bet 2 euros per spin, no more, because I want to be able to make a few spins.
To be able to make higher spins and also to survive lean periods I do together with 4 others, all pay 200 and we have now a 5x higher bankroll and can make 10 euro - spins without directly to busten....
Now we hit a x1000 win when we still have 500 euros and decide to pay out the 10500 €. So everyone gets 2100 €. If I had played alone with my 200 euros and 2 euros per spin I would now still have 100 euros + the x1000 win =2100 €.
I do not see the difference now, or do I have a thinking error?
Sunnyundflo wrote on 03/26/2019 at 18:16: we always do this with sports betting . we are 3 man
habne us made an account and each has 100 deposited .
and then we always bet 2 games with high sums and divide the win by 3
As in my previous post: if you play alone and bet only 1/3, but the same comes out🤔
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
Together we can make it big.
26th Mar. 2019, at 10:17 pm CET#30
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Stromberg wrote on 03/26/2019 at 22:01: A question times to understand :
Example:I play alone and pay 200 euro, then bet 2 euro per spin, no more, because I already want to be able to make a few spins.
To be able to make higher spins and also to survive lean periods I do together with 4 others, all pay 200 and we have now a 5x higher bankroll and can make 10 euro - spins without directly to busten....
Now we hit a x1000 win when we still have 500 euros and decide to pay out the 10500 €. So everyone gets 2100 €. If I had played alone with my 200 euros and 2 euros per spin I would now still have 100 euros + the x1000 win =2100 €.
I do not see the difference now, or do I have a thinking error?
Yes, the thinking error is that you would never have held out with 10 euro spins until the win. Always assuming a x1000 win is relatively optimistic
Together we can make it big.
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Together we can make it big.
Nobody has liked this post so far
I do not understand. With 100€ stake on a 1.2 odds you have won 20€ in case of success. Not 120€!
This post has been translated automatically
Together we can make it big.
Nobody has liked this post so far
As unlikely as you make it, but it is not that one of the favorites zb only draw plays. A 1.2 reflects a probability of occurrence of about 83% or so, since the bookmaker still includes his margin, the actual probability assumed by the bookmaker is probably more like 70 to 75%.
And especially in the well-known leagues, they are usually not so wrong. That a game does not go through is quite likely
Or in other words: if you play 10 times always a 1.2 and always bet everything again, it comes out in this case about the same as if you play a 10er Combi with all selections a 1.2 er quote and bet your 100 euros. Then you have about a 6.1 odds and therefore a chance of 1 to 6. So much more likely to lose than to win.
Now you can maybe through your knowledge and research etc. a few of the games better estimate than the bookie and see a higher probability that the Tip goes through, but still it will be more likely that at least one game does not fit...
This post has been translated automatically
Together we can make it big.
Nobody has liked this post so far
Also, no one has claimed. Win the bet, not win 120€. Logically you have won only 20€
This post has been translated automatically
Together we can make it big.
Nobody has liked this post so far
Ultimately, everything is gambling and you are always at a disadvantage against casino or bookie. If you find a niche in the sports betting area, you certainly have the greatest chances to exploit odds, but whether I aneigne me know badminton or water polo probably not. If you want to go to soccer, I trust only known leagues in the high classes that there is at least little to no manipulation... you can certainly make money kn the Chinese 2nd league, but there are certainly many games pushed and would be too risky for me 😄
This post has been translated automatically
Together we can make it big.
Nobody has liked this post so far
Okay, that's a point! 😁
This post has been translated automatically
Together we can make it big.
Nobody has liked this post so far
For example: A gives 200 €, B gives 100 €, C gives 20 € -> Total 320 € distributed to A 62.5%, B 31.25%, C 6.25%
The only question is who do you trust? For many, oneself or the Gamblejoe team is the only option, anyone else would be rightly distrusted as this happens everywhere all the time. My cousin left the family because of 150 € and broke off all contacts, and with sums like 4000 € not a few will have similar thoughts.
This post has been translated automatically
Together we can make it big.
Nobody has liked this post so far
Example: I play alone and pay 200 euros, then bet 2 euros per spin, no more, because I want to be able to make a few spins.
To be able to make higher spins and also to survive lean periods I do together with 4 others, all pay 200 and we have now a 5x higher bankroll and can make 10 euro - spins without directly to busten....
Now we hit a x1000 win when we still have 500 euros and decide to pay out the 10500 €. So everyone gets 2100 €. If I had played alone with my 200 euros and 2 euros per spin I would now still have 100 euros + the x1000 win =2100 €.
I do not see the difference now, or do I have a thinking error?
This post has been translated automatically
Together we can make it big.
Nobody has liked this post so far
As in my previous post: if you play alone and bet only 1/3, but the same comes out🤔
This post has been translated automatically
Together we can make it big.
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, the thinking error is that you would never have held out with 10 euro spins until the win. Always assuming a x1000 win is relatively optimistic
This post has been translated automatically