Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Theory of the game with bonus

Topic created on 23rd Sep. 2018 | Page: 1 of 2 | Answers: 19 | Views: 4,170
Anonym
A little flippant idea. There are always complaints about refused payouts when playing with bonus money. Violation of the terms and conditions and you can no longer win. You only get your Deposit back

Is there a case where it was the other way around or has anyone ever done that? As an example: 100 euros deposit, 100% bonus. Runs badly, at the account balance of 20 euros I think to myself, ok now I spin "quite accidentally and by mistake" with 6 euros. Of course, I only notice the faux pas afterwards.
So I let the account rest, go into the chat, say that I accidentally turned 6 euros and since I can no longer win now I ask for a refund of the deposit

When I ask in the chat what happens if I violate the bonus conditions, I get the same answer in almost every casino. Wins are confiscated, deposit is returned.

Or second case: I deposit 500 euros, have nen bonus, finally played through, even from time to time with higher spins... after I but only nen account balance of 200 euros have I request the withdrawal. How does a casino behave? Refuses the da also the payout and rather refund the deposit?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
This is then a legal matter. In practice it would probably look like this: The casino would then tell you that the bonus is canceled and you only your remaining real money (if one should still be left) would be available. So basically the wsl. you would cancel everything. Because the real money is usually played first.

I have never read anywhere in the terms and conditions that the casino is obliged to pay you back your money. Not even if you have won something, but have violated the bonus rules. However, if this point were present in the terms and conditions, you could of course also make this demand in the reverse case, as you have described it.

I honestly believe that this is all a massive gray area. Also the bonus conditions. From a purely legal point of view, a 100% bonus is advertised with a play-through rate. But these "Maximum Bets" I would like to have checked by a lawyer. I believe that this would not hold up in court and the OC's know this. And that's why they prefer to refund the real money win (in case of win). Because de facto it is so: The player has at no time insight into whether the respective spin with nem bonus or with your real money is made. In this respect, the casino cannot simply say "5 euros maximum". Because they can not dictate to you basically, with which height you play your real money. Even more so, if higher stakes are not automatically blocked by the OC's side

The return of the real money in case of a win is therefore for me a circumvention of a possible legal problem. Only, who really wants an expensive, intensive legal dispute? Because it's also a fact that the big gamblers, i.e. those who would have the money for such a dispute, don't have this rule in the first place. In this respect, this is a perfectly adapted system to the respective social status

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Yes, you are certainly right with what you say... AGBs is nothing in it...

But I now turn the tables in so far as times and say that they are obliged to pay back the money without it being in the terms and conditions. Because gambling is only gambling if you can win. As soon as you violate the rule, you no longer have the opportunity to win.

Sure, all far-fetched. And I rarely play with bonus, and if, then I read me before the conditions well. But I read here again and again, as the casinos around payouts rum drucksen. And if you can push such machinations times something the bar I'm then happy to join.

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
The problem is, the casinos are allowed to do everything without you having the possibility to do something against it.
Yes you can turn on the MGA, in most cases nothing happens.

I have written in another thread.

Everyone who deposits in the casino should be clear beforehand that he has no rights that can enforce.
No matter if the casino does not pay out or if the casino cheats.
Who does not get along with it, should not play and not cry here.
It may be nice if 5 others with howl, change that still does not.

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
but if everyone would stop for once instead of continuing to put money in.
it would be so easy!
they could all die with their fraud agb!

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend

stkrie wrote on 09/23/2018 at 5:56 pm: but if everyone would stop for once instead of continuing to put money in.
it would be so easy!
they could die with all their scam agb!

This is of course utopian.

Is the same if one says, all should not drive the cars a week so that the gas price sinks.
But I know what you mean.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
The biggest problem is that legally we can't do anything, in DE we don't have a decent gambling treaty. If something were enforceable and we could exert real pressure, we would have much more power to change something

But, my concern is that it could end up like in Austria (one Provider, monopoly, zero interest in player welfare and poor support). Also that more and more Spielos are being squeezed increasingly bothers me, why do casinos always get off so easy? Why can't DE allow licensed casinos to do business online as well? Since the contracts and conditions were probably not yet good enough...

This post has been translated automatically

Ichbins2018
Top Member
Ankor wrote on 23.09.2018 at 20:57: The biggest problem is that legally we can't do anything, in DE we don't have a decent gambling contract. If something would be enforceable and we could exert real pressure, we would have much more power to change something.

Whether fraud or not, gambling contract or none, ultimately you decide what you do with your money, or do I see it wrong?

And just imagine that it would be legal in every online casino...
Why are casino operators predominantly (in contrast to you) very successful entrepreneurs, drive the fattest cars and sunbathe on the most beautiful beaches in the world?

I personally think that they have done everything right.

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL
Expert
that was but then with the sports betting just a hick hak there were in the spielos for a while machines where you could make sports bets suddenly se were gone again Player protection was called the oddset but was still allowed of course with significantly worse odds and a few years later they were back earlier were the cashpoint and then began the rise of tipico now only tipico stores first come first served

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Ichbins2018 wrote on 09/23/2018 at 10:36 pm
Scam or no scam, gambling contract or no gambling contract, at the end of the day you decide what to do with your money, or am I seeing this wrong?

And just imagine that it would be legal in any online casino...
Why are casino operators predominantly (in contrast to you) very successful entrepreneurs, drive the fattest cars and sunbathe on the most beautiful beaches in the world?

I personally think that they have done everything right.

Can not interpret your post correctly, unfortunately. I have no problem with the concept of gambling and with therefore not automatically negative on Online Casinos, I have only expressed the personal desire that we have a secure legal basis with the rights and obligations are not only based on the goodwill of the casinos. It was not about whether they are successful entrepreneurs or not, moreover, your statement is somewhat questionable: Is it in your opinion no matter how someone makes money, as long as it works? How far would you take it morally if someone robs another person? Did he do everything right or not? I'd really be interested in your opinion on that.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics27th Dec. 2024 at 10:08 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately