Dipson wrote on 01/31/2018 at 23:44: I let MrGreen customer service tell me the sums that I have deposited and withdrawn so far.
Deposit: 11,850.00€
Withdrawal 4,358.00€
Makes a rate over 2 years of just under 36
That is in my eyes ned really much Believe since one wins in the gambling house clearly more.
What do you think of it?
It doesn't matter how much you actually paid out, but how many spins you could make with the money. Payout rate of 95% means that you lose 5% of your bet per spin in the long term average. If you play with 1€ / spin, then you lose 5 cents per spin every time (on average). At 20 spins per minute you will lose 1€ per minute and 60€ per hour with 1€ bet.
Furthermore, there are also people who are 50,000€ or more in the plus and have an AQ of 10,000%. Even if one goes after your calculation
The payout ratio is not calculated according to what was actually paid out. You can theoretically program a slot game that has an AQ of 95% but there can never be a win.
I have already written the following in another thread on this topic
You could also design a game with an AQ of 95% so that you can never win. That is, if you make a spin with 1€, then you lose with each spin exactly 5 cents or win 95 cents back (is the same). This would be a game with the smallest possible variance. Of course, there is no such game, because you would know beforehand exactly how each game ends and probably no one would play, because there would be no chance of winning.
The table shows one minute of play at a Slot machine (20 spins = 1€ loss) with a fictitious variance. Such machines do not exist. But theoretically such a game would have an AQ of 95%, although such a game would not produce a single win. There would never be a player who could pay out a win. Players who play this slot with 1€ per spin would always lose exactly 60€ per hour of play. At 10€ / spin it would be 600€ hourly loss and at 10 cents 6€ hourly loss.
You could also reprogram the game to be suitable for a gambling house, so that every spin ends with a 25% loss. Then (if there were no booking times and Co.) each player who plays with 1€ stake would lose 5€ per minute or 300€ per hour (5 times more than in casinos or online casinos).
You can't calculate a payout ratio from the deposits and withdrawals. If you Deposit 100€, win 10.000€ and don't bring it to payout and play it down, then you have lost 100€ and paid out nothing, although your AQ was far above average at the beginning.
The "true" payout ratio in online casinos
Nobody has liked this post so far
Deposit: 11,850.00€
Withdrawal 4,358.00€
Makes a rate over 2 years of just under 36
That is in my eyes ned really much Believe since one wins in the gambling house clearly more.
What do you think of it?
This post has been translated automatically
The "true" payout ratio in online casinos
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
The "true" payout ratio in online casinos
Nobody has liked this post so far
It doesn't matter how much you actually paid out, but how many spins you could make with the money. Payout rate of 95% means that you lose 5% of your bet per spin in the long term average. If you play with 1€ / spin, then you lose 5 cents per spin every time (on average). At 20 spins per minute you will lose 1€ per minute and 60€ per hour with 1€ bet.
Furthermore, there are also people who are 50,000€ or more in the plus and have an AQ of 10,000%. Even if one goes after your calculation
The payout ratio is not calculated according to what was actually paid out. You can theoretically program a slot game that has an AQ of 95% but there can never be a win.
I have already written the following in another thread on this topic
You can't calculate a payout ratio from the deposits and withdrawals. If you Deposit 100€, win 10.000€ and don't bring it to payout and play it down, then you have lost 100€ and paid out nothing, although your AQ was far above average at the beginning.
This post has been translated automatically