-
Olli_Eule, on 31st Aug. 2024 at 10:12 pm CEST
-
Harald_B, on 31st Aug. 2024 at 09:32 pm CEST
-
Daniel1988, today at 03:48 am CEST
-
Langhans_innen, today at 01:33 am CEST
-
Daniel1988, today at 01:13 am CEST
-
T0uchTheSky, today at 12:34 am CEST
-
Langhans_innen, today at 12:27 am CEST
-
T0uchTheSky, today at 12:22 am CEST
-
R3hab, yesterday at 11:53 pm CEST
-
moralischverwerflich, yesterday at 10:55 pm CEST
-
danny005, yesterday at 10:43 pm CEST
-
Frankey, yesterday at 10:16 pm CEST
-
JJepsa96, yesterday at 08:56 pm CEST
-
LiQuidz, yesterday at 04:54 pm CEST
-
moralischverwerflich, yesterday at 04:42 pm CEST
-
Butterbrezel, yesterday at 03:15 pm CEST
-
btssultan, yesterday at 11:26 am CEST
-
Hightower, yesterday at 09:01 am CEST
-
Hanshanshans, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 10:33 pm CEST
-
gamble1, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 09:40 pm CEST
-
roccoammo11, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 08:03 pm CEST
-
Butterbrezel, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 07:15 pm CEST
-
gamble1, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 05:05 pm CEST
-
XXLEONIDASXX, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 02:55 pm CEST
-
xxjj19, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 02:14 pm CEST
-
gamble1, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 08:38 am CEST
System error
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
System error
Nobody has liked this post so far
If the slots have posted 250k in payouts, subsequent players will be deprived of that amount, eating the slots as 250k is paid out to meet AQ. So simplified thought.
This post has been translated automatically
System error
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
System error
Nobody has liked this post so far
The casino would have 2 accounts. One with funds belonging to the players and one of its own.
If 100k euros are wagered in a day, the casino gets 4% of the turnover, can take 4k from the player account.
Rest remains for withdrawals (96% AQ).
The more that is wagered, the better for the casino. Each spin = 4%.
With an AQ of 96%. Now, let's go and make payouts ineffective without putting the fact into the slots. That quickly results in a much lower AQ.
There could even be double cheating.
On the one hand, you could take out these distributions yourself, but on the other hand, the slots would have to eat to keep AQ.
This post has been translated automatically
System error
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
System error
Nobody has liked this post so far
I think the slots keep a given AQ over a certain period.
Also, I do not think that the casino lives from the direct losses, but from the turnover.
It doesn't matter if you multiply your Deposit in an individual case, or lose it. This is debited or posted from the pool of player funds.
The casino earns with each spin the difference of AQ to 100. So 4% with 96% AQ. No matter if win or loss spin. Player account pays out win, subsequent players pay in and lose until AQ is met.
For each spin the casino can take its share.
This post has been translated automatically
System error
Nobody has liked this post so far
Exactly not, there is a player pool available. Even with 20k spins the casino makes its 4%. One player was lucky to spin 20k spins with a €10 Deposit, another will have an AQ of 20% for it to average 96% and serve the 4%.
This post has been translated automatically
System error
Nobody has liked this post so far
I don't see it that way now. If you consider how high the probability is to clear a higher win or the maximum win, that is already enormous.
If the slot has played this out, it will most likely take a longer time until the slot plays out such a sum again.
Therefore, in my eyes, the casino has not only saved the €20, but also the €250,000.
Therefore, it is worthwhile for casinos to have such bonus rules.
Otherwise, you would not need them at all.
There are already enough fail at the regular turnover requirements.
This post has been translated automatically