Topic created on 04th Jun. 2018 | Page: 6 of 6 | Answers: 51 | Views: 13,943
Anonym
Former Member
Streamer preferred?
12th Nov. 2018, at 07:02 pm CET#51
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
I know myself in the marketing and media area very well you always advertise with * celebrities* I say times to market a product better, simply because that is better received than when Aunt Käthe and Karl heinz Otto do something like that. It suggests just better new customers and that's what it's all about to increase profits and of course in a serious way.Personally, it just bugs me that casino's advertise with Youtubern Lapalingo does it, X other casinos too. Even advertisements are designed so see Wunderino advertising on TV. Wunderino even has its own show on the dirt channel of Sport1. Sorry but I really say dirt because this channel exploits its customers with sweepstakes and sell for stupid does, so was 9live also back then
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Streamer preferred?
12th Nov. 2018, at 08:09 pm CET#52
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Latino wrote on 11/12/2018 at 6:41 pm: @MRRobX
So under government audited/regulated/supervised casinos the gambling addicts don't suffer or suffer less ? A Schweinsteiger could have stood up and said : Don't go gambling, don't go to casinos or arcades and don't gamble online for money because you will lose - the signal effect - especially to minors- would be much better than the message "If you want to gamble then only in a casino that is approved by the Association of the German Automata Industry. Because the DAW finds only "illegal casinos" stupid but the offers of its own members fair.
I think we all agree when we say that for the Streamer other rules apply, whether now better RTP or Bonuses with conditions that you can hardly believe or strikingly good luck we leave aside and also does not play such a big role
Because it inevitably leads to the result that these streams (not all, see on many legitimate streamers in the low/mid-bet area on Twitch) do not represent reality and are therefore more likely to be assigned to the genre of reality soaps.
Hey, great post!
Even if I do not see everything as you eg the topic Schweinsteiger, so your comment is commendable!
Royal: "20 x 1.750.000 = 35.000.000 € turnover. ...
" Then the streamer would lose in the example over 5 years 1.75 million euros, right ? Maybe that's why he was happy about the 31K win for 10 minutes and then continued in the program. But economically this could work if he has Affiliate income of ~6000 euros (and this is quite feasible) - then he would be in the range +-0. "
Not quite right.
The stake is 1,750,000 € real money, provided that the player daily 1000€ on 350 days in the year uses and that 5 years in a row. ( 1000 € x 350 days x 5 years = 1.750.000 € )
So to say the loss with a RTP of 95% is "only" 87.500€
If he would play permanently with a bonus of 100%, then he would play with 1.000€ real money and 1.000€ bonus money. He must convert this bonus as a rule 30-35 times . Sometimes it succeeds, sometimes not. Therefore, the "20x" is rather an average value calculated by me. Of course, this can be much higher or lower, probably lower. But since the streamer also plays offline, so you can take the 20 as a multiplier.
Streamer preferred?
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Streamer preferred?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Hey, great post!
Even if I do not see everything as you eg the topic Schweinsteiger, so your comment is commendable!
Royal: "20 x 1.750.000 = 35.000.000 € turnover. ...
" Then the streamer would lose in the example over 5 years 1.75 million euros, right ? Maybe that's why he was happy about the 31K win for 10 minutes and then continued in the program. But economically this could work if he has Affiliate income of ~6000 euros (and this is quite feasible) - then he would be in the range +-0. "
Not quite right.
The stake is 1,750,000 € real money, provided that the player daily 1000€ on 350 days in the year uses and that 5 years in a row. ( 1000 € x 350 days x 5 years = 1.750.000 € )
So to say the loss with a RTP of 95% is "only" 87.500€
If he would play permanently with a bonus of 100%, then he would play with 1.000€ real money and 1.000€ bonus money. He must convert this bonus as a rule 30-35 times . Sometimes it succeeds, sometimes not. Therefore, the "20x" is rather an average value calculated by me. Of course, this can be much higher or lower, probably lower. But since the streamer also plays offline, so you can take the 20 as a multiplier.
This post has been translated automatically