Online Casinos in general: Small stakes > HUGE wins ;) (Page 3)

This post has been translated automatically

PAYSAFEMASTER wrote on 25/10/2018 at 16:29: welcome.
i recommend you (actually I hope that you have already figured it out yourself anyway..otherwise you have actually already lost in life) to always be honest with yourself in life and to always reflect objectively on everything you do.
therefore you should consider right at the beginning how much you are willing to Risk in gambling. it is not reprehensible if you say that you will bet your entire monthly salary on Roulette all on red, as long as you can still look yourself in the mirror afterwards.

first of all you should be aware: such high wins are the absolute core principle of this kind of fun (gambling), especially with slot machines. the possibility to achieve a very high win with a low win is the basis for the decision to bet money at such games (slots) of the players in the first place.
--
so, i interrupt the digression radically at this point. i have a lot to do today, it's nice weather outside, i'm typing from my cell phone, i'm not telling you anything new, and many more reasons.
therefore very short and to the point:

try livecasino. many games are extremely easy to play and can be understood without reading the rules. depending on your willingness to take risks, high wins are possible and high capitalization can be varied as desired.

since i don't assume that you or anyone else here trusted the '''hot button" with alleged random generator back then at the call-in-tv station 9live & co, i can also only conditionally understand the playing of slots. insofar just consider quite neutral:
-the technological progress in today's age
-the greed of man / homo economicus
-the theoretical potential everywhere where people are willing to give away their own money
-the manifold different possibilities and approaches, how one could basically design a game process in order to take a part of the players' money in the long run

this is not an accusation about possible manipulations. merely a non-judgmental thought-provoking impulse. due to the very fact that i personally can't understand it.

roulette is not very wise either, but there at least you know that on average you "only" give away 2.7% of your capital. and in the live versions you can just watch the guarantee of the random result.

you can also bet on roulette in such a way that you win with a chance of 97.3% of all possible game results (bet 35 numbers plein), but even then you will be paid on your bet with a capital loss. in the long run you lose in any case extremely reliable the -2.7% of your turnover. you can try with 100€ to bet every round 1€ on red or black.

i also started as a low roller. 2007 opened account for betting and poker. par jahen watched videos, eg from CasinoTester with 1000€ on red, thought to me the guy is absolutely crazy. a little later (this year) I have achieved in livecasino a total turnover record within a single day (at least 23h played continuously of course) of almost a quarter of a million. losing four-digit amounts in one day or using them in a low-risk game round almost leaves me cold. but although it will be very hard for you/you to believe: at the end of the month, sometimes effectively 99 cents of cash are missing for a pack of noodles. thank god, my salary has been garnished down to the subsistence level for two months now.

long story short:
by all means try it in the livecasino. but be aware: from the second or third time you have multiplied your starting capital/deposit amount by more than 1000x, you put yourself in danger. don't want to generalize the inability to control the gambling behavior, but: only through repeated extreme multiplication of your starting capital, you are at all in the position to know about the effective potential.

and playing slots is something everyone has to decide for themselves. personally, i would never risk my hard-earned money there, at least not wantonly. sounds a bit paradoxical and polarizing now, but this serves to clarify my point of view and is not meant to come across as provocative.

in this sense

think about it

your king of cards

aka PAYSAFEMASTER
aka not_here_for_fun
aka daum
aka --nexxon
aka Nebutzermane
aka BETFATAL
aka verylastaccount
aka last20euroagain
aka CasinoTesterCH
aka ffhu
a.v.m.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

zocker123 wrote on 10/25/2018 at 7:15 pm
really sry the biggest bullshit i have ever heard...

with the calculations at Roulette etc.... because of red and black please don't get a black hangover....


i used to go gambling in real casinos, what I have experienced there...... ... ... ... (and not a 0815 casino but they advertise that they are one of the largest in Europe)

that eg 40 times in a row red came or eg 5 times in a row the same number... (what do you think what people have gambled away money on the high roll not thousands but really 10,000tende within a few minutes... I have seen with my own eyes...... ...


so stop me because of red and black bet have already lost 1000s of euros in roulette......

one can calculate there nothing and just as little with systems gamble what I have also already tried...


sounds stupid, but with slots I am less in the minus than with roulette therefore I zock also no roulette

This post has been translated automatically

SevenEleven wrote on 10/25/2018 at 3:28 pm: Nice welcome from you guys, thanks.

300 Shields and Donuts are noted and will be tested (I picked them up here in the forum as well, but forgot again). What stakes are you playing them on, Redriver67?
Roman Legion and Six Acrobats and Gold of Persia don't mean anything to me yet. I'm curious about these as well.

Otherwise: The Pink Elephants and White Rabbits... These two slots are among the ones that drive me crazy because I've heard/read/seen many times how well they can give... but only to everyone else and not to me.

Your stats, Julian... Not bad. Awakens my ambition... if only I could endure DoA for longer than 'half an hour.

This post has been translated automatically

(what do you think people gambled away money on the high roll not thousands but really 10.000ths within a few minutes... i saw it with my own eyes...... ...

This post has been translated automatically

PAYSAFEMASTER wrote on 10/26/2018 at 03:13: ..but who has never experienced 40s EC series at Roulette?
i see several times a day 70 times r
is red in sequence and so. is clear, ne?

i swear, on my mother's life: if you can show me one single permanent from the livecasino (evolutiongaming) with doubtless verifiable and traceable evidence (screenshots/video/account history/date/ID), where longer EC series fell than those from my gaming experience, i'll give you 1000€.

five times the same number is nothing wild. in the last half hour alone, the same number fell four times in a row followed by another doublespin right after that (speedroulette table, EG, feel free to look it up yourself)



i don't know what to say about that. discussion here is over at this point.

i recommend you to get the leading german-, french-, and english-language literature which is leading in this gambling variant. (whereby: according to your opinion this is only nonsense anyway...)
because to dismantle your statements one by one my time is simply too precious

obvious in your contribution would also be trollery..but I also do not care

oh well: if there really is no mathematical formula for the long-term result of the invested capital, i congratulate you on solving the roulette problem.

This post has been translated automatically

SevenEleven wrote on 10/25/2018 at 5:30 pm

Hi Paysafemaster,


first of all: your openness... mega. Thanks for the insight. And related to your sentence I quoted: paradox, polarizing, provocative - fits, I'm good with that.
I'll keep your post in mind. With the Tip "Live Casino" I will deal more closely, as soon as the Internet has become faster with me here in the country. Otherwise, I can not say much about your post, because I ES (the gaming, the addiction potential, the dangers) in principle / generally not so drastically (ab)evaluating as you judge, for ME. In personal responsibility. To put it casually: I assume that there are different types of players. Keywords: willingness to take risks, courage vs. cowardice or reason, negligence, etc. That you want to appeal, to warn from your own experience, I find sympathetic and very important. I would like to leave that, but without relating it too much to myself. Not because I am arrogant and exclude, for example, that something like you happens to me and my salary is seized, but because I want to exclude it and quasi "must" to be able to keep the fun in the game.

Not to cheat yourself too much - that saves your ass in case of doubt

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically