Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Scam: Lapalingo cashout denied. 7350€ (Page 3)

Topic created on 20th Aug. 2018 | Page: 3 of 4 | Answers: 31 | Views: 14,605
Anonym
Daniel wrote on 08/21/2018 at 21:04

Man, you can't say Lapalingo is brazen. Lapalingo has only good things in mind and is definitely just misunderstood.

Wunderino and Lapalingo.

Two completely unserious casinos and that despite MGA license.

What they pull here again is not a "bonus trap" but once again fraud.

Alone that these casinos deliberately build traps already shows their mafia business practices.

And you have to say it again and again: You can only do that because the MGA allows it and has no guidelines to which all casinos have to adhere.


Why did you actually still list the casino if you have no contact with them anyway?
Players who perhaps do not read every thread do not know that yet and assume that every casino that you promoted is absolutely 1A, as Gamblejoe also wants to claim for himself.
Since but please be a little more consistent and do not wait until the last minute. It may turn away damage from one or the other player and is better that a new player registers on Videoslots. Then you have more of it because the player will be a satisfied customer and you ultimately have more of it.

This post has been translated automatically

redriver67
Expert
Weis still that Lapalingo has once been at the top of the list. Now you have to scroll down almost to the basement to find it at all. My, that already says a lot. Soon we'll probably have to dig a hole with a shovel to find it. Such casinos belong to the moon shot so that they can do no harm. Can yes then the man in the moon beguile and lay on the cross.

This post has been translated automatically

Daniel
Elite
Random wrote on 21/08/2018 at 21:19
Wunderino and Lapalingo.

Two completely unserious casinos and that despite MGA license.

What they pull here again is not a "bonus trap" but once again fraud.

Alone that these casinos deliberately build traps already shows their mafia business practices.

And you have to say it again and again: You can only do that because the MGA allows it and has no guidelines to which all casinos have to adhere.

The MGA puts too much focus on any money laundering prevention and some on Player protection and less to hardly on consumer protection. The MGA also has no legislative function, but it only monitors that existing laws are complied with.


Why did you actually still list the casino if you have no contact with them anyway?
Players who perhaps do not read every thread do not know that yet and assume that every casino you promote is absolutely 1A, as Gamblejoe also wants to claim for himself.
Since but please be a little more consistent and do not wait until the last minute. It may turn away damage from one or the other player and is nevertheless better that a new player on Videoslots registers. Then you have more of it because the player will be a satisfied customer and you ultimately have more of it.

Lapalingo is a strong shaky candidate and if it could be proven that Lapalingo actually deliberately worked with minors, then this casino would still be on the Grey- or Blacklist tonight. Maybe someone can send us a photo of the underage Calvin and a manager of Lapalingo. If there is such a photo or other evidence, then always here with it! Casinos are not deleted by us, but they are put on the greylist or the blacklist if necessary


Unfortunately, there are just too few of the 1A casinos, but also many 2B casinos and then there are the 99Z casinos (but they are not listed here). According to our own rules, we can basically list any online casino. In principle, it is only important to us that a European gambling license is available and that fair software is used - i.e. no fake slots. Of course, it is also important that the online casino pays out the winnings that were legally won and that there is no insolvency.

We try to list here as far as possible only good Online Casinos, because we could not afford it so far organizationally (lack of money and staff) simply to list more casinos. But we have now grown strongly and continue to grow strongly. Therefore, these problems will soon be a thing of the past.

Our goal is that at some point all EU casinos will be listed here - the good, as well as the bad. With us, there is yes the possibility of each online casino to evaluate and then everyone can investigate for themselves and decide whether they want to play in an online casino or not.

I think this approach is also good and better than listing only selected casinos. If, for example, the casino tester now says that Lapalingo is his absolute favorite casino, then you can look at the user reviews of Lapalingo with us, whether Lapalingo is also the favorite casino of other players in German-speaking countries and then make a decision. Otherwise, there would only be the voice of some affiliates, because on GambleJoe deleted or non-existent.

This post has been translated automatically

K****t
Random wrote on 21/08/2018 at 21:19
Wunderino and Lapalingo.

Two completely unserious casinos and that despite MGA license.

What they pull here again is not a "bonus trap" but once again fraud.

Alone that these casinos deliberately build traps already shows their mafia business practices.

And you have to say it again and again: You can only do that because the MGA allows it and has no guidelines to which all casinos have to adhere.


Why did you actually still list the casino if you have no contact with them anyway?
Players who perhaps do not read every thread do not know that yet and assume that every casino that you promoted is absolutely 1A, as Gamblejoe also wants to claim for himself.
Since but please be a little more consistent and do not wait until the last minute. It may turn away damage from one or the other player and is better that a new player registers on Videoslots. Then you have more of it because the player will be a satisfied customer and you ultimately have more of it.

Exactly, why is Lapalingo still listed here as a recommendable casino?
It's bad enough that they bring in such positive reviews with tricks and Bonuses on Askgamblers and try to relativize or even eliminate the negative reviews through feigned friendliness.
But here?
The connections with this fraud casino Playbet24, the whole accusations because of the minor, the disgusting bonus traps, which are provable, all the negative experiences here... alone this would have to put this casino at least on the Greylist.
I can only reiterate that Lapalingo made me write a positive review on Askgamblers against their explicit rules because I did not know that my negative review would be deleted as a result.
Askgamblers support was not fond of it.
A bonus of 25 Euro and a friendly answer from Sarah should convince me that all was well after all...
Then the countless positive reviews in the last week daily, just by promise of bonuses for it.

Sorry, but this has less than nothing to do with seriousness or trust.

Who coerces players hiddenly to convert the converted bonus SELF into real money, with the intention that they do not know and/or forget, and who coerces them to write positive reviews, has nothing lost on this market.
Lapalingo is dealt with far too gently.
I don't get it.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Daniel wrote on 08/21/2018 at 23:06
Lapalingo is a strong shaky candidate and if it could be proven that Lapalingo was actually knowingly working with minors, this casino would still be on the grey or Blacklist tonight. Maybe someone can send us a photo of the underage Calvin and a manager of Lapalingo. If there is such a photo or other evidence, then always here with it! Casinos are not deleted by us, but they are put on the greylist or the blacklist if necessary


Unfortunately, there are just too few of the 1A casinos, but also many 2B casinos and then there are the 99Z casinos (but they are not listed here). According to our own rules, we can basically list any online casino. The only important thing for us is that the casino has a European gambling license and uses fair software - i.e. no fake slots. Of course, it is also important that the online casino pays out the winnings that were legally won and that there is no insolvency.

We try to list here as far as possible only good Online Casinos, because we could not afford it so far organizationally (lack of money and staff) simply to list more casinos. But we have now grown strongly and continue to grow strongly. Therefore, these problems will soon be a thing of the past.

Our goal is that at some point all EU casinos will be listed here - the good, as well as the bad. With us, there is yes the possibility of each online casino to evaluate and then everyone can investigate for themselves and decide whether they want to play in an online casino or not.

I think this approach is also good and better than listing only selected casinos. If, for example, the casino tester now says that Lapalingo is his absolute favorite casino, then you can look at the user reviews of Lapalingo with us, whether Lapalingo is also the favorite casino of other players in German-speaking countries and then make a decision. Otherwise, there would only be the voice of some affiliates, because on GambleJoe deleted or non-existent.

Hello Daniel

Sorry for the late reply.

Yes, there are unfortunately far too few 1A casinos.
A few of them I have only learned through you at all.
I am still enthusiastic about Videoslots even if the slots are not doing well at the moment.

I also understand the idea that you want to have the best all casinos listed and so to speak the users can evaluate.

But what do you think of the idea to create an extra category with just these 1A casinos?
So casinos where, so to speak, Gamble Joe puts his hand in the fire for the guaranteed everything is fine as with Videoslots.
So inexperienced users can immediately make a picture of it and the bigger Gamblejoe becomes the more casinos will try to get into this 1A list.
I can still remember when you promised a user once that you will personally transfer him the money if he does not get the payout at Slotsmillion. Such casinos I mean, where you can be absolutely sure. So safe that you would even step in with your private money because you know that everything is fine. Which you understandably would not do for example Lapalingo.

So you could advertise not so popular casinos but the players would then just on their own responsibility there collect their own experiences or can just fall back on the 1A casinos if they want to be on the very safe side.

Just a suggestion.

This post has been translated automatically

Daniel
Elite
Random wrote on 08/23/2018 at 2:26 pm
Hello Daniel

Sorry for the late reply.

Yes, there are way too few 1A casinos unfortunately.
A few of them I have only learned through you at all.
I am still enthusiastic about Videoslots even if the slots are not doing well at the moment.

I also understand the idea that you want to have the best all casinos listed and so to speak the users can evaluate.

But what do you think of the idea to set up an extra category with just these 1A casinos?
So casinos where, so to speak, Gamble Joe puts his hand in the fire for the guaranteed everything is fine as with Videoslots.
So inexperienced users can immediately make a picture of it and the bigger Gamblejoe becomes the more casinos will try to get into this 1A list.
I can still remember when you promised a user once that you will personally transfer him the money if he does not get the payout at Slotsmillion. Such casinos I mean, where you can be absolutely sure. So safe that you would even step in with your private money because you know that everything is fine. Which you understandably would not do for example Lapalingo.

So you could advertise not so popular casinos but the players would then just on their own responsibility there collect their own experiences or can just fall back on the 1A casinos if they want to be on the very safe side.

Just a suggestion.

Geiler suggestion! A similar idea came to me yesterday thanks to your post even myself, but I forgot to note it down. Thanks for replying here again.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Daniel wrote on 08/23/2018 at 7:30 pm
Awesome suggestion! I actually came up with this idea myself yesterday thanks to your post, but forgot to make a note of it. Thanks for replying here again.

Very much.
I'm glad that you like the proposal.

This post has been translated automatically

derbastiii1

Even the one from the support chat has confirmed it to me
http://prntscr.com/km6mne

http://prntscr.com/km6mvc
http://prntscr.com/km6n2j


This post has been translated automatically

Cerebrum
Visitor
Your first and last name can be viewed through the link in the screenshot.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Make you all a Blacklist and set

Wunderino
The luck of the draw
Lapaloma

I can not read it anymore, every day complaints and why
the whole ? Because these scammers are also advertised on DSF.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 05:39 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately