Pokerstars Casino in contrast to "pure" online casino
25th Nov. 2019, at 11:22 pm CET#11
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Kleinkariert wrote on 25/11/2019 at 22:44
Who is supposed to laugh at €0.40? Gambling on 1-2 € is almost always morbid. If you don't exactly get 6000-7000 € net monthly or a good bonus then stakes above min bet are sick.
0.40 € is also already a case where I would say minimum 2500 € a month net or you do not play so often. By the way, Chili is very risky, can win really well but extremely long give nothing and therefore always to be treated with caution.
True, especially with these extremely volatile slots you should be aware that it is an enormous burden on the money to play these slots successfully.
Also the bankroll management, which is indispensable for successful Poker, can be applied in a slightly modified form. There are several examples of this on the net. You just have to be aware that you can and will never be permanently in +.
It feels like this is the case with most of the creators of the countless "fraud" threads. There is times just the monthly salary in a casino transferred and played on 5+€ Bonanza. After 10 minutes you wonder where the money has gone.
Pokerstars Casino in contrast to "pure" online casino
26th Nov. 2019, at 02:37 am CET#12
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Kleinkariert wrote on 25/11/2019 at 22:44
Who is supposed to laugh at €0.40? Gambling on 1-2 € is almost always morbid. If you don't get 6000-7000 € net monthly or a good bonus then stakes above min bet are sick.
0.40 € is also already a case where I would say minimum 2500 € a month net or you do not play so often. By the way, Chili is very risky, can win really well but extremely long give nothing and therefore always to be enjoyed with caution.
I believe that some by their financial situation are quite capable of playing so high that stakes of 40 cents are not really exciting for them.
Could have saved me that in the brackets. It was superfluous to mention it that way.
Mathematically, you're probably right. Am there burned market, so I spend what I have won elsewhere.
I've read through too many threads here that I myself wouldn't put it down to what someone might need to invest or earn to play this or that, on the stakes. I think there are many additional indicators that play a role.
Pokerstars Casino in contrast to "pure" online casino
Nobody has liked this post so far
True, especially with these extremely volatile slots you should be aware that it is an enormous burden on the money to play these slots successfully.
Also the bankroll management, which is indispensable for successful Poker, can be applied in a slightly modified form. There are several examples of this on the net. You just have to be aware that you can and will never be permanently in +.
It feels like this is the case with most of the creators of the countless "fraud" threads. There is times just the monthly salary in a casino transferred and played on 5+€ Bonanza. After 10 minutes you wonder where the money has gone.
This post has been translated automatically
Pokerstars Casino in contrast to "pure" online casino
Nobody has liked this post so far
I believe that some by their financial situation are quite capable of playing so high that stakes of 40 cents are not really exciting for them.
Could have saved me that in the brackets. It was superfluous to mention it that way.
Mathematically, you're probably right. Am there burned market, so I spend what I have won elsewhere.
I've read through too many threads here that I myself wouldn't put it down to what someone might need to invest or earn to play this or that, on the stakes. I think there are many additional indicators that play a role.
This post has been translated automatically