Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Player from Austria gets €2.5 million back from Novomatic (Page 2)

Topic created on 23rd Oct. 2018 | Page: 2 of 3 | Answers: 27 | Views: 5,750
Anonym
Marqes wrote on 10/23/2018 at 11:23: Sunk in vending machines....

Who controlled this, how did he prove it?
Online something like that would be provable, but offline?

An example would be if across from the arcade was an ATM where he always withdrew. At many Admiralhallen (100% subsidiary of novomatic) there is an ID requirement and an access restriction with player card.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
BonanzaKing wrote on 10/23/2018 at 12:17 PM
An example would be e.g. If opposite from the arcade an ATM would be where he always withdrew. At many Admiralhallen ( 100% subsidiary of novomatic) there is yes an ID requirement and an access restriction with spielerkarte.

The identity card obligation and player cards did not exist in 2002, you could still play freely, everything came years later.
However, it will have been reconstructable through withdrawals in the vicinity

This post has been translated automatically

Marqes
Expert

Unbeliver wrote on 23/10/2018 at 12:54 PM
The ID requirement and player cards didn't exist in 2002, you could still go play freely then, it all came years later.
But it will have been reconstructable by withdrawals in the vicinity

That's what I was thinking, they haven't been around that long.


And to withdraw the money in the proximity...could also have been a coincidence.
I wonder how it came to the charge, there is not really evidence.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Marqes wrote on 10/23/2018 at 12:57 PM

I was just thinking the same thing, they haven't been around that long.


And to withdraw the money nearby...could have been a coincidence.
I wonder how it came to the charge, evidence there is not really.

As Random wrote, there is an association or similar with the appropriate legal know-how. In a chain of evidence also count regularities and if he has always taken off in the vicinity can this already be recognized

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Unbeliver wrote on 23/10/2018 at 12:54 PM
The ID requirement and player cards didn't exist in 2002, you could still go play freely then, it all came years later.
But it will have been reconstructable by withdrawals in the vicinity

You're right about that, my mistake.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Sorry somehow he always wants twice from the phone. .

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon
But if he has gambled away this sum at the machines directly, then I find the whole thing extremely fuzzy.he can not even prove that he has really sunk this money into the machines. Online that would be something else, because here you can see the bookings everywhere and thus also really prove.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
I would also like to have my 200000 back, but unfortunately I live in Germany in a country where you violate the Basic Law, in a country with disastrous politicians and halunken. Amen.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Falko wrote on 23.10.2018 at 14:45: But if he has gambled away this sum at the machines directly, then I find the whole thing already extremely spongy.The can not even prove that he has really sunk this money in the machines. Online that would be something else, because here you can see the bookings everywhere and thus also really prove

As far as I know, you can only reclaim the money that you can prove.
That is: He has withdrawn so much with the ATM or credit card.

There is yes in every arcade this possibility.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
Random wrote on 23/10/2018 at 20:59
As far as I know, you can only claim back the money that you can prove.
That is: He has withdrawn so much with the ATM or credit card.

Is there yes in every arcade this possibility.

In Austria, you can withdraw money in the arcade itself?

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics24th Nov. 2024 at 04:24 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately