Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%) (Page 23)

Topic created on 01st Jul. 2021 | Page: 23 of 32 | Answers: 312 | Views: 131,788
Anonym
the belgian ones are all good because they have the belgian state license. Played once at Blitz, payout came without
larifari. That was 2 years ago.
But I think it is no longer possible. There were quite a few Belgian providers but Germans must now stay outside.
And yes of course theoretically tes also others so the whole UK providers were all good, Ireland too. But that is practically since 2013
already over. Since July 2021 now completely
(except sports betting there are still Bet365, Willhill and Ladbrokes with 5% tax for the Germany GmbH)

This post has been translated automatically

deaddeaddead
I know you all don't want to hear this but the rtp has no meaning for a single player.

However, I'm not surprised that most people are so impressed by it. They certainly believe they will only lose 4% of their money in the casino because they saw a 96 at the beginning. Their own experience does not seem to mean that much in any case

This post has been translated automatically

moralischverwerflich
Expert
deaddeaddead wrote on 18.01.2022 at 21:25: I know you all don't want to hear this now again but the rtp has no meaning for a single player.

That's true, but it does make a noticeable difference, even if it's only a few percent.
What also many probably do not take into account, every win counts, even if it's only half the bet. Profit is profit and thus the slot can rip you off even with kleinmist and still meet the rtp in the end on average.

This post has been translated automatically

crystal_machmeth
Experienced
I can highly recommend slotbox, have there with the 25 bonus spins which you get 7 days after first Deposit 700 paid out as bitcoin.

Verification within 30 minutes, then payout within 10 hours.

Good rtp that you notice immediately and very similar to Wildz or others of the rootz group.

This post has been translated automatically

crystal_machmeth
Experienced
Raptor casino I find halfway okay but one thing really annoyed me.

I deposited there 400 with Bitcoin and was able to make a good profit but unfortunately they allegedly had a technical problem with the payout.

Thus, I have burned everything again after more than a week of waiting.

Shortly after when my bankroll was empty I got a mail that the withdrawal works.

Very annoying and untrustworthy would be very careful.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Something like that always seems very funny. Money gone and poof went the payout

This post has been translated automatically

xaan2012
Amateur
domi2103 wrote on 01/07/2021 at 16:05
Curacao casinos can have such a lousy rtp even without additional tax. Seems to give there no specifications or are the there much more flexible and do not have to show the player that apparently.
Have seen it often at Play n Go that in the info regarding the rtp was simply nothing to find.

The lower rtp has not necessarily what to do with an additional tax. A good example is the 7 Stars group. There, some of the Red Tiger slots have been running at around 90%rtp for some time, even at mga-licensed casinos

I had some time ago made a request to ASKGambler regarding RTPs PLayngo and that before the tax introduction.

"The Authority is publishing amendments to Article 22 of the Player protection Directive (Directive 2 of 2018) (the "Directive") to rationalize the minimum Return to Player ("RTP") percentage applicable to licensees in all sectors. The amendment consists of lowering the existing minimum RTP percentage (applicable to operators offering their games online) from ninety-two percent (92%) to eighty-five percent (85%).

The MGA recognizes that responsible decision-making requires consideration of feedback from industry stakeholders and therefore conducted a closed consultation in May 2021 to better assess the viability of the proposed change to the minimum RTP threshold...."


Nothing more needs to be said...

This post has been translated automatically

xaan2012
Amateur
domi2103 wrote on 01/07/2021 at 16:05
Curacao casinos can have such a lousy rtp even without additional tax. Seems to give there no specifications or are the there much more flexible and do not have to show the player that apparently.
Have seen it often at Play n Go that in the info regarding the rtp was simply nothing to find.

The lower rtp has not necessarily what to do with an additional tax. A good example is the 7 Stars group. There, some of the Red Tiger slots have been running at around 90%rtp for some time, even at mga-licensed casinos

"The Authority is publishing amendments to Article 22 of the Player protection Directive (Directive 2 of 2018) (the "Directive") to rationalize the minimum Return to Player ("RTP") percentage applicable to licensees in all sectors. The amendment consists of lowering the existing minimum RTP percentage (applicable to operators offering their games online) from ninety-two percent (92%) to eighty-five percent (85%).

The MGA recognizes that responsible decision-making requires consideration of feedback from industry stakeholders and therefore conducted a closed consultation in May 2021 to better assess the viability of the proposed change to the minimum RTP threshold...."

This post has been translated automatically

BenOssi123
Rookie
Has anyone had experience with LocoWin? They don't have any restrictions, do they? Everything looks serious at first.

This post has been translated automatically

xaan2012
Amateur
BenOssi123 wrote on 21.01.2022 at 05:02: Has anyone had experience with LocoWin? They don't have any restrictions do they? Looks all serious for now.

belongs to gammix with sugar and rant. can only say in my opinion the best casinos.
Serious payout relatively fast and RTP are good to very good. have brought in the some wins.

N1 etc can throw against it in the garbage can......

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Dec. 2024 at 05:24 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately