Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%) (Page 10)

Topic created on 01st Jul. 2021 | Page: 10 of 32 | Answers: 312 | Views: 131,821
Tinag1
Amateur
Sugar Casino, viggoslots, loccowin, 20bet, I'm not sure about rant, but these are also tax and throttle free

This post has been translated automatically

TranceBabe
Expert
evopower140 wrote on 29.07.2021 at 13:16 clock: Well that with the RTP I do not see now so quite so from my experience I must really say that I am thick in the minus at Platincasino and have the highest RTP at BOD

At NYspins and N1 I got more fat pictures so at Platin also in Freegames

Yes, of course RTP 100000 spins and so on

However, my experience is so and yes I play a lot and almost only BOD to 95% and have it at 56000 euros at Platin this year not even managed to make a 1000 plus hit

However, at N1 and Nyspins with much less bet already 11 times so it is for the most part further luck and not only the RTP

My speech, the RTP are in the first place not really responsible for whether and how much you win. In the first place, it is still, just luck

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

TranceBabe wrote on 07/31/2021 at 10:26 PM
My speech, the RTP are not really responsible in the first place, if and how much you win. In the first place, it is still, just luck.

Still don't get it?

An RTP of 86% reduces the chance of a bit of luck by a factor of 3, simply because 3x more money is retained by the OCs.

This post has been translated automatically

TranceBabe
Expert
Klempo77 wrote on 24/07/2021 at 16:47
Is only play'n'go, netent, Pragmatic and Red tiger left.

At VoodooDreams as well. 🤢

This post has been translated automatically

TranceBabe
Expert
RainerHeiner wrote on 07/31/2021 at 22:39 PM

Still don't get it?

An RTP of 86% reduces the chance of the quentschen luck by a factor of 3, because simply 3x more money is retained by the OCs.

As already mentioned in the other thread: I don't attach any importance to the RTP, because I haven't won more at the BoD slots with 96% than at the BoD slots with 86%. On the contrary. Understand now? 🙄

This post has been translated automatically

WhatAboutTism
Rookie

TranceBabe wrote on 07/31/2021 at 22:55
As already mentioned in the other thread: I don't put any value on the RTP, because I haven't won more at the BoD slots with 96% than at the BoD slots with 86% so far. On the contrary. Understand now? 🙄

Very one-sided view. Play 100 spins on a slot that only delivers 87% RTP and deducts taxes as a "reward". The whole thing then several times, then you will see the effect yourself

It's not even so much about wins. Your playtime will simply be drastically reduced and you'll butter up more money on average over time. You'll notice this at the latest when it becomes significantly more expensive to play per month, but some people don't seem to understand that

The Variance and the "luck factor" have nothing to do with it but only what the slot pays out on average in the return
Well have fun still using MGA OC with the "great new regulation".

This post has been translated automatically

Krabbenburger
Experienced
TranceBabe wrote on 07/31/2021 at 22:55
As already mentioned in the other thread: I don't attach any importance to the RTP, because I haven't won more at the BoD slots with 96% than at the BoD slots with 86% so far. On the contrary. Understand now? 🙄

84% is the lowest version . A Curacao casino has even once compensated players because the game accidentally ran with the 84% setting instead of 94% as planned .
Funny that 84% and 87% versions are now almost standard for German in Malta casinos.
But I'm sure there are also fake versions somewhere that don't run on the Play and Go servers with an even lower RTP.
Maybe around 50% RTP I'm sure you will win more there than with this evil evil rip-off 96% version

This post has been translated automatically

B****3
WhatAboutTism wrote on 01/08/2021 at 02:28 PM

Very one sided view. Play 100 spins on a slot that delivers only 87% RTP and deducts taxes as a "reward". The whole thing then several times, then you will see the effect yourself

It's not even so much about wins. Your playtime will simply be drastically reduced and you'll butter up more money on average over time. You'll notice this at the latest when it becomes significantly more expensive to play per month, but some people don't seem to understand that

The Variance and the "luck factor" have nothing to do with it but only what the slot pays out on average in the return
Well have fun still using MGA OC with the "great new regulation".

And who guarantees you that the rtp at the Curaçao booth is correct?
In addition, there is always the unpleasant feeling of not getting paid his win

Of course I understand your argument, nevertheless I agree with trance babe, with me it runs neither better nor worse than before. And whether that is already evident within a month, I also dare to doubt

How do you want to determine that?

The rtp refers to infinite spins that no one can track . And if a lowered rtp bothers me, I should rather stop completely

Or how do you explain all the winning pictures here, plus the megahits?

Don't see any difference from before

This post has been translated automatically

WhatAboutTism
Rookie

Blubbo33 wrote on 03.08.2021 at 07:34
And who guarantees you that the rtp is right at the curaçao pad?
In addition, there is always the unpleasant feeling of not getting paid his win

Of course I understand your argument, nevertheless I agree with trance babe, with me it runs neither better nor worse than before. And whether that is already evident within a month, I also dare to doubt

How do you want to determine that?

The rtp refers to infinite spins that no one can track . And if a lowered rtp bothers me, I should rather stop completely

Or how do you explain all the winning pictures here, plus the megahits?

Don't see any difference from before.

You don't need to be guaranteed that, you just need to check it yourself (if you know how it can be done)
In any case, it runs much better than in the Malta booths, and I now use 6 different Curacao OC

And about Curacao OC itself. Here, for understandable reasons, like Malta OC "praised", but I have in recent months even much more positive experiences with the "pöhsen" Curacao casinos made. This starts with the customer service and ends with the 3 minute payouts (even slightly higher amounts, in one case 2k). Malta OC were generally not that much better, only the licensing and the constant talk of "reputable" gave these OC simply the more positive veneer, because I may as well have made very negative experiences with Malta OC. You can find black sheep in every industry and at all locations

To claim that Curacao casinos are bad is a very far-fetched fallacy. It is up to the player to inform himself or do you think the "supervised" play as it is now propagated and implemented by the state makes the situation better for everyone here?

It's not about Player protection but as in all other cases where father state once again comes up with new laws "to protect its citizens" to enact rip-off and monopoly cementation, no more and no less. Why should we put up with this?

Your opinion in honor, but if a lowered RTP (as you call it) bothers me, I just do not stop but look for alternatives that do not limit me in my freedom of play, it's that simple

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
Only that there are more black sheep of Curacao casinos than MGA licensed casinos.
And where exactly should you inquire Askgamblers?
With them, every casino is serious, the main thing that pay.

Why are no Curacao casinos included here, that has its reason.Do you think Gj would not like to pocket the commission

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics23rd Dec. 2024 at 01:09 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately