Online Casinos in general: Online casino must pay back 132,000 euros to Paderborn woman (Page 3)

Falcon wrote on 07/29/2021 at 01:29 PM
Why should the enforcement fail at the European Court of Justice? It has nothing to do with it.

If the casino does not pay you can seize by means of European enforcement order in all European countries. That means: all accounts of the casino, even the furniture from its offices, etc. Even the credit card companies and other payment providers that work with them can be written to and can be intercepted in case of doubt money that the casino transfers

As long as the casino is located in Europe, the casino almost can not avoid paying the money. With ner Curacao Bude it looks there again quite different.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

DieWunderharke5000 wrote on 07/29/2021 at 08:44: So let's hold on:

Casinos where you don't win are all scumbags.
The casinos are cheating you because they introduced the 1€ rule to prevent you from getting your losses back.
You want your money back on the grounds of gambling addiction.
But you do nothing against your Gambling addiction but gamble diligently in new casinos, because at the beginning you always win and then everything is fraud again.

As I said before, if you would try to do something against your gambling addiction, I could understand you. But you have not yet and apparently do not intend to continue

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Falke wrote on 28.07.2021 at 23:12
I find it almost schizophrenic how you talk in other threads about how gambling addicts take their own lives and then at the same time in threads like this consider it totally reprehensible when someone takes back 100,000 euros.

Who in their right mind would ever Deposit that kind of money to get a few pictures spinning? That the woman has a massive gambling problem is obvious and the casino has done NOTHING about it.

That some casino manager gets himself a new Porsche and sips cocktails in Haiti at the expense of an addictive disease and to the chagrin of another person for the money seems to bother no one. It's just because it's voluntary - what kind of voluntariness is there in addiction?

I am also absolutely in favor of personal responsibility, etc. But a minimum of Player protection must be in place.
The casino didn't care if this woman lost her entire livelihood and did so consciously. As if a casino would not know with such high deposits that in most cases a person just financially destroys itself. The even speculate on it and then send every day very '' special'' offers to squeeze out the last.

I begrudge them the payback and I hope that many others will follow. Casinos are many things, but certainly not a moral place. Whoever enriches himself when a person just destroys himself, I certainly do not cry a tear after the fact that now the new Porsche must be financed by another addict.

If a casino acts normally and accepts more or less inconspicuous deposits, then there is nothing at all to object to. But over 100,000 in a single casino and the casino does not find that unusual, no, you support it even.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

evopower140 wrote on 07/29/2021 at 08:21 AM

However, an authority in Malta must also carry out this enforcement and there it will Scheidern the can not get the bread in Malta from the plate whole Malta lives from the casinos and thus it will not be so easy there

This post has been translated automatically

Falke wrote on 07/29/2021 at 11:30 AM
I think you just don't really know what a European order for payment means and what the legal situation is about it.

But yes, would be nice if in the future any municipal employees may decide whether judicial decisions are carried out or not.

This post has been translated automatically

XxxGamerXxx wrote on 07/29/2021 at 03:02 PM
The lawyer gets 10% only in case of success. Would be 4900EUR I can live with. Since I no longer play in these casinos without hin and the casinos are simply and simply yes also rich by fraud it itches me absolutely zero, as far as morality is concerned. Because believe me, I rather think about my health, than whether it is now morally reprehensible or not to reclaim his money from these clubs.


You left over 50k. Now just imagine that someone comes around the corner and tells you, watch out, I can get your money back. I can not imagine with the best will in the world that you then say, oh you know what, the money should keep the casino times, because I am so patronizing today. Especially if you know that you will never again put a cent in these shit stores. You always go out of gambling as a loser, but still you can try to go out of the situation as a winner.

And apart from that, losing is disproportionate to winning. I am aware that you always come out of it as a loser. But since I don't play at a casino for a long time anymore, I often come out a winner. E.g. I had newly registered at Boomcasino. 15k paid out, with a Deposit of 500EUR. And then it is immediately apparent what it comes down to. You will lose everything again very quickly. 3k I have lost subsequently let close the account and went out of the casino with 11.5k. And I can only recommend this to everyone, not to daddle too long at a casino.

You are far more likely to lose if you stick to a casino all the time. Apart from that, Lapalingo banned me for no reason with a loss of 9.6k. For me, this will then also only be a genungtuung to take action against them

Lapalingo has been sued before.

https://www.anwalt24.de/fachartikel/zivilrecht/55698

I think these verdicts are also beneficial for FatherState. Because if enough people reclaim their losses from casinos, they will sooner or later go bye-bye like PayPal did back then. That's probably why these judgments are increasing. I think that's good, because you can also get out of the whole Sche****.

By the way, I am already indicated because of illegal gambling . Proceedings will probably be discontinued. Also I had already stress with the tax office, because I played on very high stakes and very high cash deposits and withdrawals are made. However, the tax office does not collect taxes or anything else, because I could prove that everything had to do with slots

The 50k Win on a 10er would accept me with a kiss hand .

This post has been translated automatically

evopower140 wrote on 07/29/2021 at 08:50 AM

And that is exactly the point were I a casino in Malta I would sue him for fraud


That's premeditated fraud the way you do it you plan it all out knowing that you don't want to do anything about your addiction and play at other ocs in the evenings until they are the bad guys

This post has been translated automatically