Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Online casino must pay back 132,000 euros to Paderborn woman (Page 2)

Topic created on 28th Jul. 2021 | Page: 2 of 4 | Answers: 34 | Views: 8,359
MasterChiefKief
Expert

Online casino must pay back 132,000 euros to Paderborn woman

28th Jul. 2021, at 11:36 pm CEST#11
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Falke wrote on 28.07.2021 at 23:12
I find it almost schizophrenic how you talk in other threads about how gambling addicts take their own lives and then at the same time in threads like this consider it totally reprehensible when someone takes back 100,000 euros.

Who in their right mind would ever Deposit that kind of money to get a few pictures spinning? That the woman has a massive gambling problem is obvious and the casino has done NOTHING about it.

That some casino manager gets himself a new Porsche and sips cocktails in Haiti at the expense of an addictive disease and to the sorrow of another person for the money seems to bother no one. It's just because it's voluntary - what kind of voluntariness is there in addiction?

I am also absolutely in favor of personal responsibility, etc. But a minimum of Player protection must be in place.
The casino didn't care if this woman lost her entire livelihood and did so consciously. As if a casino would not know with such high deposits that in most cases a person just financially destroys itself. The even speculate on it and then send every day very '' special'' offers to squeeze out the last.

I begrudge them the payback and I hope that many others will follow. Casinos are many things, but certainly not a moral place. Whoever enriches himself when a person just destroys himself, I certainly do not cry a tear after the fact that now the new Porsche must be financed by another addict.

If a casino acts normally and accepts more or less inconspicuous deposits, then there is nothing at all to object to. But over 100,000 in a single casino and the casino does not find that unusual, no, you support it even.

+1 Absolutely agree with you.

This post has been translated automatically

XxxGamerXxx
Amateur

Online casino must pay back 132,000 euros to Paderborn woman

28th Jul. 2021, at 11:52 pm CEST#12
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Falke wrote on 28.07.2021 at 23:12
I find it almost schizophrenic how you talk in other threads about how gambling addicts take their own lives and then at the same time in threads like this consider it totally reprehensible when someone takes back 100,000 euros.

Who in their right mind would ever Deposit that kind of money to get a few pictures spinning? That the woman has a massive gambling problem is obvious and the casino has done NOTHING about it.

That some casino manager gets himself a new Porsche and sips cocktails in Haiti at the expense of an addictive disease and to the sorrow of another person for the money seems to bother no one. It's just because it's voluntary - what kind of voluntariness is there in addiction?

I am also absolutely in favor of personal responsibility, etc. But a minimum of Player protection must be in place.
The casino didn't care if this woman lost her entire livelihood and did so consciously. As if a casino would not know with such high deposits that in most cases a person just financially destroys itself. The even speculate on it and then send every day very '' special'' offers to squeeze out the last.

I begrudge them the payback and I hope that many others will follow. Casinos are many things, but certainly not a moral place. Whoever enriches himself when a person just destroys himself, I certainly do not cry a tear after the fact that now the new Porsche must be financed by another addict.

If a casino acts normally and accepts more or less inconspicuous deposits, then there is nothing at all to object to. But over 100,000 in a single casino and the casino does not find that unusual, no, you support it even.

That's how it looks!!!!
I have also now actually read some judgments. I will now also tackle this! All casinos that have now introduced the 1EUR rule and in which I am damn high in the loss, I will also try to reclaim my losses. Have already booked online an appointment with a lawyer.

Sunnypalyer, Cherrycasino, LeoVegas and Lapalingo I have a total loss of 49,000EUR. Since the 1EUR regulation I have not deposited a cent more in these casinos. I mean why should the money lie around with them, when I have the chance to reclaim these funds. Apart from that, I no longer play at these casinos since the new regulations.

And honestly, I don't give a damn about morals!!! You don't get an award for diligently depositing in the casinos and only losing anyway according to the current state. At the end of the day, it's your money!

This post has been translated automatically

DieWunderharke5000
Top Member

Online casino must pay back 132,000 euros to Paderborn woman

29th Jul. 2021, at 12:21 am CEST#13
5 Likes
XxxGamerXxx wrote on 28.07.2021 at 23:52
I mean why should the money be lying around with them when I have the chance to reclaim these funds.

Because you deposited there.
Because you gambled it away.
Because you knew exactly what you were doing and you even admit to not having deposited in the casinos that adhere to the new player protection(!), but in others

I suppose you have already gone to therapy?
In the OASIS file you have of course also already registered?
You have made sure that you no longer Deposit in Curacao casinos and have blocked such transactions at your bank?

No? Then what do you think justifies the repayment of your losses?

This post has been translated automatically

evopower140
Expert

Online casino must pay back 132,000 euros to Paderborn woman

29th Jul. 2021, at 12:28 am CEST#14
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
This is quite true, but I don't think any casino will pay out this money

You get right before the German court, but this company is not located in Germany

Thus, an enforcement is already somewhat more difficult the player can try to initiate an enforcement with the court decision, but I think this will fail at the latest at the European Court of Justice

That is difficult is yes the player has right in Germany and the money was awarded to him however he has it still for a long time this way is the heavy.

The woman now has a letter at home that she is 100 000 euros richer but she can buy nothing with it

This post has been translated automatically

evopower140
Expert

Online casino must pay back 132,000 euros to Paderborn woman

29th Jul. 2021, at 12:51 am CEST#15
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
XxxGamerXxx wrote on 07/28/2021 at 23:52
Here's the deal!!!!
I have also now actually read some judgments. I'm going to tackle that now too! All casinos that have now introduced the 1EUR rule and in which I am damn high in the loss, I will also try to reclaim my losses. Have already booked online an appointment with a lawyer.

Sunnypalyer, Cherrycasino, LeoVegas and Lapalingo I have a total loss of 49,000EUR. Since the 1EUR regulation I have not deposited a cent more in these casinos. I mean why should the money lie around with them, when I have the chance to reclaim these funds. Apart from that, I no longer play at these casinos since the new regulations.

And honestly, I don't give a damn about morals!!! You don't get an award for diligently depositing in the casinos and only losing anyway according to the current state. At the end of the day, it's your money!

Since I would be careful since you are still a current player do not believe times that all the casinos from Malta put up with it

Evtl sue you in Malta because of fraud or the like because what you have planned is also not quite so legal you get on the one hand money from illegal gambling but you operate it on the other hand still with other platforms

Think that is also something like fraud or so

This post has been translated automatically

XxxGamerXxx
Amateur

Online casino must pay back 132,000 euros to Paderborn woman

29th Jul. 2021, at 01:23 am CEST#16
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

evopower140 wrote on 29.07.2021 at 00:51 Clock
I would be careful since you are still a current player do not think that all the casinos from Malta put up with it

Evtl sue you in Malta because of fraud or the like because what you have planned is also not quite so legal you get on the one hand money from illegal gambling but you operate it on the other hand still with other platforms

Think that is also something like fraud or something

That's right. As for that, the following is pretty interesting:


"Pursuant to Section 105(2) of the Civil Code, a declaration of intent made in a state of unconsciousness or temporary disturbance of mental activity is also void. The nullity of a contract leads to the reversal of the transaction under enrichment law. What has been obtained must then be refunded.
The Gambling addiction present in online gambling in particular can also be qualified as a state of temporary mental disturbance.
The gambling contracts are then void if the stakes are placed to satisfy the gambling addiction.
The gambling stakes made in the state of temporary mental disorder shall then be returned. The fact that gaming contracts concluded on account of gambling addiction are invalid has also already been confirmed by the Higher Regional Court of Hamm.
However, other factual constellations are also conceivable in which the claim for restitution is also justified in other ways (e.g. despite self-blocking, the casino allows the player to play, violation of a limit set by the player)."


Regarding your point that the company is not located in Germany, you can note the following:
"as long as the casino is based within the EU, the casino can be sued abroad. However, the consumer does not have to assert his rights abroad. The court at the consumer's place of residence is responsible.
The Regulation on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Regulation No. 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12.12.2012/EuGVVO) applies
According to the EuGVVO, a consumer's action against his contractual partner (entrepreneur) can also be brought at the place where the consumer is domiciled."


This post has been translated automatically

Falke
Expert

Online casino must pay back 132,000 euros to Paderborn woman

29th Jul. 2021, at 01:29 am CEST#17
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
evopower140 wrote on 29.07.2021 at 00:28: That is quite correct, however, I think no casino will pay out this money

You get right before the German court, however, this company is not located in Germany

Thus, an enforcement is already somewhat more difficult the player can try with the court judgment to initiate an enforcement but this will fail I think at the latest at the European Court of Justice

That is difficult is yes the player has right in Germany and the money was awarded to him however he has it still for a long time this way is the heavy.

The woman has now a letter at home that she is 100 000 euros richer but she can buy nothing with it

Why should the execution fail at the European Court of Justice? He has nothing to do with it.

If the casino does not pay, one can seize by means of European enforcement order in all European countries. That means: all accounts of the casino, even the furniture from its offices, etc. Even the credit card companies and other payment providers that work with them can be written to and can be intercepted in case of doubt money that the casino transfers

As long as the casino is located in Europe, the casino almost can not avoid paying the money. With ner Curacao Bude it looks there again quite different.

This post has been translated automatically

XxxGamerXxx
Amateur

Online casino must pay back 132,000 euros to Paderborn woman

29th Jul. 2021, at 01:33 am CEST#18
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

DieWunderharke5000 wrote on 07/29/2021 at 00:21 PM
Because you deposited there.
Because you gambled it away.
Because you knew exactly what you were doing and you even admit to not depositing in the casinos that adhere to the new player protection(!), but in others

I suppose you have already gone to therapy?
In the OASIS file you have of course also already registered?
You have made sure that you no longer Deposit in Curacao casinos and have blocked such transactions at your bank?

No? Then what do you think justifies the repayment of your losses?

So? I deposited there and lost. Do you think the casinos care that I lose a lot of money because of an addiction? Why should I care when I have the opportunity to reclaim my losses?

Deposit money with bad odds and then suddenly introduce the 1EUR regulations? With 1EUR stakes, your chances of winning anything at all decrease significantly.
All casinos where I have registered, have the seat in Malta.

The game is always the same. Sign up and you win like out of the blue. But suddenly the possibilities to win become close to 0. Who really believes that it is just coincidence, which is not to help. I think you have to do as much damage to the casinos as possible.

This post has been translated automatically

BenOssi123
Rookie

Online casino must pay back 132,000 euros to Paderborn woman

29th Jul. 2021, at 02:08 am CEST#19
1 Like

Liked this post: Avatar von sippi sippi
XxxGamerXxx wrote on 07/28/2021 at 23:52
Here's the deal!!!!
I have also now actually read some judgments. I'm going to tackle that now too! All casinos that have now introduced the 1EUR rule and in which I am damn high in the loss, I will also try to reclaim my losses. Have already booked online an appointment with a lawyer.

Sunnypalyer, Cherrycasino, LeoVegas and Lapalingo I have a total loss of 49,000EUR. Since the 1EUR regulation I have not deposited a cent more in these casinos. I mean why should the money lie around with them, when I have the chance to reclaim these funds. Apart from that, I no longer play at these casinos since the new regulations.

And honestly, I don't give a damn about morals!!! You don't get an award for diligently depositing in the casinos and only losing anyway according to the current state. At the end of the day, it's your money!

Very good! Spend quietly in addition still coal for a lawyer, for everything that happened in the casinos before the 01.07. Nice with seat on Malta and also with Player protection that you could have activated permanently with one click, but it has not.

You will get n shit back and that's good. As an addition, you can even be displayed for illegal gambling 👍🏻

I've left way more than 50k in my life and have had one negative shine after another. But I've never blamed anyone else for my shit.

Either you stand by the fact that you gamble and accept the high financial losses or you leave it.

If you would have won 50k on a 10€ bet at Lil Devil now, the casino would be your best friend wa?

This post has been translated automatically

XxxGamerXxx
Amateur

Online casino must pay back 132,000 euros to Paderborn woman

29th Jul. 2021, at 03:02 am CEST#20
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
BenOssi123 wrote on 29/07/2021 at 02:08 PM
Very good! Spend calmly in addition still coal for a lawyer, for everything that happened in the casinos before 01.07. Nice with seat on Malta and also with Player protection you could have activated permanently with one click, but it has not.

You will get n shit back and that's good. As an addition, you can even be displayed for illegal gambling 👍🏻

I've left way more than 50k in my life and have had one negative shine after another. But I've never blamed anyone else for my shit.

Either you stand by the fact that you gamble and accept the high financial losses or you leave it.

If you would have won 50k on a 10€ bet at Lil Devil now, the casino would be your best friend wa?

The lawyer gets 10% only in case of success. Would be 4900EUR I can live with. Since I no longer play in these casinos without hin and the casinos are simply and simply also rich by fraud it itches me absolutely zero, which concerns the morality. Because believe me, I rather think about my health, than whether it is now morally reprehensible or not to reclaim his money from these clubs.


You left over 50k. Now just imagine that someone comes around the corner and tells you, watch out, I can get your money back. I can not imagine with the best will in the world that you then say, oh you know what, the money should keep the casino times, because I am so patronizing today. Especially when you know that you will never again put a cent in these shit stores. You always go out of gambling as a loser, but still you can try to go out of the situation as a winner.

And apart from that, losing is disproportionate to winning. I am aware that you always come out of it as a loser. But since I don't play at a casino for a long time anymore, I often come out a winner. E.g. I had newly registered at Boomcasino. 15k paid out, with a Deposit of 500EUR. And then it is immediately apparent what it comes down to. You will lose everything again very quickly. 3k I have lost subsequently let close the account and went out of the casino with 11.5k. And I can only recommend this to everyone, not to daddle too long at a casino.

You are far more likely to lose if you stick to a casino all the time. Apart from that, Lapalingo banned me for no reason with a loss of 9.6k. For me, this will then also only be a genungtuung to take action against them

Lapalingo has been sued before.

https://www.anwalt24.de/fachartikel/zivilrecht/55698

I think these verdicts are also beneficial for FatherState. Because if enough people reclaim their losses from casinos, they will sooner or later go bye-bye like PayPal did back then. That's probably why these judgments are increasing. I think that's good, because you can also get out of the whole Sche****.

By the way, I am already indicated because of illegal gambling . Proceedings will probably be discontinued. Also I had already stress with the tax office, because I played on very high stakes and very high cash deposits and withdrawals are made. However, the tax office does not collect taxes or anything else, because I could prove that everything had to do with slots

The 50k Win on a 10er would accept me with a kiss hand

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 08:11 am CET

Offline Casinos
0
Casino Games
0
Offline Casinos
0

GambleJoe Team

Profile picture of JulianJulian
Community-Manager / Complaint SpecialistProfile picture of CounterCounter
Software developerProfile picture of MatthiasMatthias
Project manager
Profile picture of DanielDaniel
Founder

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately