Topic created on 16th Sep. 2018 | Page: 2 of 2 | Answers: 11 | Views: 4,194
s****e
Forum posts:1.004Member has been banned
OCs soon to be banned in Austria
17th Sep. 2018, at 04:13 pm CEST#11
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Peter8 wrote on 17.09.2018 at 11:27: It's hard to believe what Novomatic is doing,they are already making a lot of money and want even more for what?
I can not understand
This was often the subject of discussion here. Nobody gets their neck full, it always has to be more. And when the legal ways are exhausted, you just have to look further...
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
OCs soon to be banned in Austria
17th Sep. 2018, at 04:27 pm CEST#12
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Peter8 wrote on 17.09.2018 at 11:27: It's hard to believe what Novomatic is doing,they are already making a lot of money and want even more for what?
I can not understand
Believe me, as soon as larger companies see possible monopoly positions or high market share opportunities, this is not infrequently secured with brutal methods (hush money, alternatively one buys other companies and works with displacement strategies). Alone supermarkets and discounters in Germany have to fight for their diversity, whereby it is no longer so diverse - very much belongs to one group or the same owner. Are perhaps 5 large suppliers who dominate almost the entire food market in Germany and these fight each other daily with competition, which exerts pressure on suppliers and manufacturers - unless the manufacturer is a big number, it will be difficult to push against it - these then let it out on the employees (poor working conditions, low wages, always overtime, ...).
With the news we get always the similar mush, because print media are led by 3 to 4 large agencies. In the case of drinking water, Nestle has been trying for years to get the government to finally privatize the water so that we can also pay 1 € per liter for tap water? But even the worst politicians have never been that corrupt - especially since the municipalities defend their waterworks like their gold in a bunker. Many regions have poor infrastructures, so that only 1 or 2 companies supply a large region, and accordingly the price of electricity can then also rise without any problems. Price comparisons bring also only initially something, because the new offers are usually fast transparent bait offers - that one advertises now already with 1-2 years price fixing is sad. Previously, it was normal that the price remains constant or does not increase annually and this is exactly what happens after the price maintenance was fulfilled. The companies are not even willing to pay 8.84 € minimum wage properly, it is saved at every corner with the staff. If there were earlier 3x work clothes, one gets today in the best case a T-shirt or a jacket and that once. In some companies, you are always subliminally asked to buy additional work clothes from the company where you work. If you don't do that, then your chances of passing the probationary period without any problems are slim.
Not every company completely exhausts the profit maximization and still shows a halfway tolerable behavior. There is also money invested in good personnel, but these companies are not in the majority. This is not possible when companies that have been on the market for 150 years set themselves utopian goals such as 10% more win every year. Somewhere then evenly one saves, one invests in personnel... if it becomes however too expensive then one dismantles evenly briefly 2000 places and makes the people unemployed. Mostly it is not even about huge sums, the boss is shown on the basis of the past and some factors how the future can change (weighted according to different probabilities). He can then choose if he wants to, for example
a) lay off 5000 employees, saves a total of 100,000 € per year
b) Train employees, better customer satisfaction can increase sales by 20% in the next 5 years
c) Other rationalization measures (e.g. standatize machines), saves €50,000
He can choose all three or only b and c. But for companies that earn billions a year and may have trillions on the side (usually large companies have many subsidiaries), 100,000 € is not even 0.1% of the daily win. And for that you suspend people, a few years later it runs better and you hire more again and that goes all the time. If the calculation results in less, you quickly throw a few people out, etc. anyone who has also studied business administration or knows something about it can confirm. And no, people who have studied business administration are not less critical or inhumane. Most learn it for completely natural reasons, there are BWL teachings where good employee care, good environmental awareness, etc. is a big part of it all. But in the course of time you will notice that people do not want a people-friendly company, but want to quickly manage high wins. Therefore out sourced you quickly times in another country, if the hourly wage there is only a quarter as high you save huge costs and is not even bound to the employees. The protection against dismissal in Germany is one of the best in the world, even if it is not perfect.
OCs soon to be banned in Austria
Nobody has liked this post so far
This was often the subject of discussion here. Nobody gets their neck full, it always has to be more. And when the legal ways are exhausted, you just have to look further...
This post has been translated automatically
OCs soon to be banned in Austria
Nobody has liked this post so far
Believe me, as soon as larger companies see possible monopoly positions or high market share opportunities, this is not infrequently secured with brutal methods (hush money, alternatively one buys other companies and works with displacement strategies). Alone supermarkets and discounters in Germany have to fight for their diversity, whereby it is no longer so diverse - very much belongs to one group or the same owner. Are perhaps 5 large suppliers who dominate almost the entire food market in Germany and these fight each other daily with competition, which exerts pressure on suppliers and manufacturers - unless the manufacturer is a big number, it will be difficult to push against it - these then let it out on the employees (poor working conditions, low wages, always overtime, ...).
With the news we get always the similar mush, because print media are led by 3 to 4 large agencies. In the case of drinking water, Nestle has been trying for years to get the government to finally privatize the water so that we can also pay 1 € per liter for tap water? But even the worst politicians have never been that corrupt - especially since the municipalities defend their waterworks like their gold in a bunker. Many regions have poor infrastructures, so that only 1 or 2 companies supply a large region, and accordingly the price of electricity can then also rise without any problems. Price comparisons bring also only initially something, because the new offers are usually fast transparent bait offers - that one advertises now already with 1-2 years price fixing is sad. Previously, it was normal that the price remains constant or does not increase annually and this is exactly what happens after the price maintenance was fulfilled. The companies are not even willing to pay 8.84 € minimum wage properly, it is saved at every corner with the staff. If there were earlier 3x work clothes, one gets today in the best case a T-shirt or a jacket and that once. In some companies, you are always subliminally asked to buy additional work clothes from the company where you work. If you don't do that, then your chances of passing the probationary period without any problems are slim.
Not every company completely exhausts the profit maximization and still shows a halfway tolerable behavior. There is also money invested in good personnel, but these companies are not in the majority. This is not possible when companies that have been on the market for 150 years set themselves utopian goals such as 10% more win every year. Somewhere then evenly one saves, one invests in personnel... if it becomes however too expensive then one dismantles evenly briefly 2000 places and makes the people unemployed. Mostly it is not even about huge sums, the boss is shown on the basis of the past and some factors how the future can change (weighted according to different probabilities). He can then choose if he wants to, for example
a) lay off 5000 employees, saves a total of 100,000 € per year
b) Train employees, better customer satisfaction can increase sales by 20% in the next 5 years
c) Other rationalization measures (e.g. standatize machines), saves €50,000
He can choose all three or only b and c. But for companies that earn billions a year and may have trillions on the side (usually large companies have many subsidiaries), 100,000 € is not even 0.1% of the daily win. And for that you suspend people, a few years later it runs better and you hire more again and that goes all the time. If the calculation results in less, you quickly throw a few people out, etc. anyone who has also studied business administration or knows something about it can confirm. And no, people who have studied business administration are not less critical or inhumane. Most learn it for completely natural reasons, there are BWL teachings where good employee care, good environmental awareness, etc. is a big part of it all. But in the course of time you will notice that people do not want a people-friendly company, but want to quickly manage high wins. Therefore out sourced you quickly times in another country, if the hourly wage there is only a quarter as high you save huge costs and is not even bound to the employees. The protection against dismissal in Germany is one of the best in the world, even if it is not perfect.
This post has been translated automatically