Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: monte already withdrawing from casinos again? (Page 3)

Topic created on 04th Oct. 2019 | Page: 3 of 3 | Answers: 27 | Views: 13,220
S****8
Stromberg wrote on 06.10.2019 at 14:44
I haven't experienced it in Germany either, that neighbors rummaged through my garbage. And I find your representations a bit exaggerated. Personally, at least, I am grateful to live in Germany, and not in a country where people are really bad.

this is how it looks ...

This post has been translated automatically

Dbac79
Elite

Kleinkariert wrote on 06/10/2019 at 03:29
The CO2 tax should change the behavior of people and companies, so that there is an incentive not to always choose the environmentally harmful way. There were also ideas that you get paid annually a sum for example 100 € and who does not consume more than average can then even save money. The CDU was rather for railroad tax reduction (thereby tickets are a bit cheaper) and for an improved commuter allowance (helps only a few).

In my opinion, it would be desirable that the social contributions and taxes are adjusted. The way the money is partly used and the justifications lead for a long time to the fact that groups of people mutually hostile. Probably that is partly but also wanted.

do you think that changes anything, the people pay and is good but no one will change because of it and what some change is not noticed at all because e.g. half a continent with pick ups drives the 40-50 liters on 100 km consume

This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert
Expert
Dbac79 wrote on 10-06-2019 10:45 PM

do you think that changes anything, people pay and good but no one will change because of it and what some change is not even noticed because e.g. half a continent drives with pick ups that consume 40-50 liters per 100 km

As long as the public transport is well developed and electric cars become suitable for the masses (price, charging, performance) I can imagine a certain change.

Not everywhere, especially in the countryside and smaller cities will be little shake. The situation with UPS and other delivery companies is critical but not unsolvable.

Find the topic difficult, you would have to look that you do not force the switch with bans. The climate package that was supposed to come was shortened by the way, the goals are formulated much looser.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
You hit the point exactly: it must be so that it is affordable - as long as electric cars are far too expensive and the range is a joke - you can not charge the normal sockets - as long as that is nix. Currently this suv discussion is also extremely on my nerves. I live in the countryside in the forest and need in winter simply nen suv - point. Electric version costs the same once 20-30K more ... does not work. They should rather explore hydrogen engines or other fuels that are not so polluting. Sorry for OT

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
Veteran wrote on 06.10.2019 at 23:48: You hit the point exactly: it must be so that it is affordable - as long as electric cars are far too expensive and the range is a joke - you can not charge the normal sockets - as long as that is nix. Currently this suv discussion is also extremely on my nerves. I live in the countryside in the forest and need in winter simply nen suv - point. Electric version costs the same once 20-30K more ... does not work. They should rather explore hydrogen engines or other fuels that are not so polluting. Sorry for OT

As very often, such things are simply not discussed differentiated enough. If you need an appropriate car, there is nothing against it. Rather, the doctor's wife in the big city should ask herself if she has to do the shopping with a suv and bring the children to school.
But I'm not in favor of banning anything, but I still have the small hope that some people might start thinking about it at some point.

This post has been translated automatically

S****8
Veteran wrote on 06.10.2019 at 23:48: You hit the point exactly: it must be so that it is affordable - as long as electric cars are far too expensive and the range is a joke - you can not charge the normal sockets - as long as that is nix. Currently this suv discussion is also extremely on my nerves. I live in the countryside in the forest and need in winter simply nen suv - point. Electric version costs the same once 20-30K more ... does not work. They should rather explore hydrogen engines or other fuels that are not so polluting. Sorry for OT

Exactly so it will come ...in not too long time the Japanese with a hydrogen car come along ...the are then again a step ahead because one must debate here in DE for years ...

Which does not bother me because then I continue to drive my gasoline !

the time will show it ...but all this has nothing to do with the topic that streamers withdraw from casinos

This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert
Expert
Sweep88 wrote on 07.10.2019 at 15:54
Exactly so it will come ...in not too long time the Japanese with a hydrogen car will come along ...they are then again a step ahead because you have to debate here in DE for years ...

Which does not bother me because then I continue to drive my gasoline !

time will tell ...but all this has nothing to do with the topic that streamers withdraw from casinos

It really has little to do with the topic, but was at least for me a really good and interesting topic.

To come back at least a bit: Apparently Knossi is checking if what he is doing is legal so that the same thing happens as with Monte.

This post has been translated automatically

artofjosh
Amateur
Pretty cold-blooded of the government to bug Montana like that....

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics25th Dec. 2024 at 08:56 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately