Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: MontanaBlack - Account seizure for gambling! (Page 5)

Topic created on 25th Jan. 2019 | Page: 5 of 8 | Answers: 74 | Views: 20,691
Anonym
9c-3f wrote on 01/26/2019 06:53 PM
So connected to him that you fight him? For someone you saw from the stream? Knowing is probably an exaggeration.
How come?

i am a fan

This post has been translated automatically

9****f
Ok. That explains it then.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
capriz wrote on 01/25/2019 23:00: I do not know why some are so gleeful here. If his account was seized for illegal gambling, it means that for the first time a person is convicted publicly and thus gives all authorities the opportunity to refer to this case. Thus, we would be away from the "gray zone" and all online gamblers would have to fear charges. For this, only the bank/financial office must initiate the necessary steps.

Exactly so it looks like.very well summarized.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Small question from me. he has everything behind him packs his things and moves to where online gambling is allowed. does there exactly the same. is that then also punishable. money laundering, etc.
It would then also money laundering if I would gamble in England and transfer it to me in Germany, if I win.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Manfrede4 wrote on 26.01.2019 at 08:44 clock: Small question from me .He has everything behind him packs his things and moves to where online gambling is allowed.Makes there exactly the same.Is that then also punishable.Money laundering etc
It would then also money laundering if I would gamble in England and transfer it to me in Germany, if I win.

yes, since the offer is aimed at German players.it does not matter whether it is allowed bsw.in malta.the state bloodhounds are very aggro, if they have you once on the radar.

This post has been translated automatically

berserkertobi
Rookie
This Montana does not say why his account was seized. Maybe it was also due to some tax stories - I think that is more likely. See:




I don't think it was because of "illegal" gambling. in 2014, a master painter was also convicted of "illegal" gambling by a local court and the verdict was overturned in 2016 because it is not really illegal. There is an official permission (just in Malta). Illegal gambling is when, for example, you set up Slot machines, Roulette or Blackjack tables in the basement of a bar and let people gamble there or gamble yourself.

§ 284
Unauthorized organization of a game of chance
(1) Whoever without official permission publicly organizes or holds a game of chance or provides the facilities for this purpose shall be punished with imprisonment for up to two years or a fine.


However, an official permit is available for most online casinos. Nowhere does it say that this permission had to be granted in Germany. Otherwise it would also be punishable if you gamble on vacation in a licensed casino. No one will ever be legally convicted for this, not in 100 years!

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
OpaOma wrote on 26.01.2019 at 09:03
yes,because the offer is aimed at german players.it doesn't matter if it's allowed bsw.in malta.the state bloodhounds are very aggro about it,once they have you on their radar.

But this is a wrong statement. The laws of the country in which I am staying apply and not the German laws abroad. All the people who fly to Las Vegas and play there do not make themselves punishable. This would also be easy to determine since many on Facebook etc.. Post pictures of it...
If gambling or smoking Pot is legal in another country, I can do that there too.
There would also be no administrative assistance of the respective country (maximum big laughter in Malta, for example), with illegal act according to the laws there would be something else.
Money that was won abroad is then also no longer money laundering, because it is already legal in the country, tax law it is then again something else, the taxes must be paid.

This post has been translated automatically

Ichbins2018
Top Member
https://www.gluecksspiel-und-recht.de/urteile/Verbot-von-Poker--und-Casinospiele-im-Internet-weiterhin-verfassungsgemaess--Bundesverwaltungsgericht-20171026/

This post has been translated automatically

Horsepower44
Top Member
Just a thought:
There is a suspicion of money laundering. Maybe Montana has simply pushed money over to Lapalingo. Which he then received back in the form of this 500% bonus (with absurdly low conversion conditions). Would of course be stupid to stream this, but Lapalingo has already publicly exposed itself with this Calvin case. I don't really believe that, but that would explain this process. What do you think? Could it have been like this or similar? One could spin the thing now of course still further, but since this is a pure speculation I consider that for my part now not necessary

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Horsepower44 wrote on 01/28/2019 08:08: Just a thought:
The suspicion of money laundering is yes in the room. Maybe Montana has simply pushed money over to Lapalingo. What he then in the form of this 500% bonus (with absurdly low conversion conditions) has received back. Would of course be stupid to stream this, but Lapalingo has already publicly exposed itself with this Calvin case. I don't really believe that, but that would explain this process. What do you think? Could it have been like this or similar? One could spin the thing now of course still further, but since this is a pure speculation I consider that for my part now not necessary.

I think one must find oneself there into the justiziale world of thought purely: The public prosecutor's office proceeds from an illegal participation in gambling.Let's leave that simply times in such a way.If he achieves now with it wins and these then "skims off" - that means nothing else than that he lets himself pay these on his bank account, or where also always, - then that would fulfill in the eyes of the public prosecutor's office the facts of the "money laundering".He has drawn funds from "criminal offences".A rather hard number.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 07:15 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately