-
Olli_Eule, on 31st Aug. 2024 at 10:12 pm CEST
-
Harald_B, on 31st Aug. 2024 at 09:32 pm CEST
-
Langhans_innen, today at 01:33 am CEST
-
Daniel1988, today at 01:18 am CEST
-
Daniel1988, today at 01:13 am CEST
-
T0uchTheSky, today at 12:34 am CEST
-
Langhans_innen, today at 12:27 am CEST
-
T0uchTheSky, today at 12:22 am CEST
-
R3hab, yesterday at 11:53 pm CEST
-
moralischverwerflich, yesterday at 10:55 pm CEST
-
danny005, yesterday at 10:43 pm CEST
-
Frankey, yesterday at 10:16 pm CEST
-
JJepsa96, yesterday at 08:56 pm CEST
-
LiQuidz, yesterday at 04:54 pm CEST
-
moralischverwerflich, yesterday at 04:42 pm CEST
-
Butterbrezel, yesterday at 03:15 pm CEST
-
btssultan, yesterday at 11:26 am CEST
-
Hightower, yesterday at 09:01 am CEST
-
Hanshanshans, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 10:33 pm CEST
-
gamble1, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 09:40 pm CEST
-
roccoammo11, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 08:03 pm CEST
-
Butterbrezel, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 07:15 pm CEST
-
gamble1, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 05:05 pm CEST
-
XXLEONIDASXX, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 02:55 pm CEST
-
xxjj19, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 02:14 pm CEST
-
gamble1, on 6th Sep. 2024 at 08:38 am CEST
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
You can't do anything against Curacao licensed casinos like Vulkan Vegas .... The process financiers don't even accept that. With well-known MGA casinos you might have chances.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post:
Max_Bet
If you turn back a few pages, you will actually find many answers.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
1. Casino = out-of-court settlement, got the money.
2. Casino = court date at the beginning of December (plus point is already on our side, since a settlement offer was made, which was however utopian low and thus quasi as a Concession is evaluated)
3. Casino (2 pieces / same provider) payment request from the court can not be delivered, because at the addresses nothing is to be found and according to the lawyer felt daily the address is changed.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post:
Max_Bet
lol xD
Edit by Julian: font color was adjusted
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post:
genrix,
Rainmann
And yet you continue to upload winning videos?:D
Interesting. The last even on Stake. You should be reported.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
😂 On what grounds?
Because I reclaimed coal and play somewhere else?
Do you know where I stay while I play? You play yourself at Stake.... So don't give me that
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post:
genrix,
Max_Bet,
Rainmann,
Schlumpi1010
Without judging you and others I think he means because you have claimed the money back and play it again somewhere else and this is actually cheating
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
I do. However, I don't reclaim my losses to put them back somewhere else. That is more than brazen. If you are pathologically addicted to gambling and have lost all control, you should be "entitled" to get your losses back and only then.
The post here is called: Online casinos in general: Money back because of gambling law.
People here claim not to have known that many a casino did not operate legally (*wink*). This pretext you have certainly also advanced.
And then to go there and Deposit the recovered coals at Stake, is already shit-repentant.
I'm not a fan of the lawsuits that you sometimes read about here, but I would make an exception for something like this.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
And when all the money is gambled away again, do you try to get the money back?
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
1. I certainly don't need to sue for coal to get it somewhere else. Since I am not dependent on it. Life has been good to me lately, and without wanting to talk myself up or (as it is called) the "normal worker shift / normal earner have now long left behind me and earn quite rarely below a 3 times average salary. Therefore, this statement definitely does not apply to me.
2. The statement that only gambling addicts should do it, I also support in part, but you can assume that 90% of them will gamble it away again. That's why I'm a bit split in my opinion.
I was long also no friend of it, however as I have already mentioned, if one the coal is held quasi before the nose, one grasps nevertheless to. And the MGA booths, not all but very many, have screwed us but also for years. Why not turn the tables?
Morals or not, legal illegal Senegal doesn't give a shit.
From the first payout I financed 2 short vacations without having to go to the savings account ... and I can sleep very well with it.
The casino operator who cheated the German player out of money, still sleeps 3 times better..
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
Inform yourself in the matter times something and follow certain statements here. Then you would know that it is almost impossible to do something like that in Curacao booths. I have been paying nothing into MGA shops for ages.
Ergo, it should be understood that it is not my intention to do it again to try it another time. But nobody seems to realize that here.
Here only the moral club is unpacked instead of times written to understand and discuss sensibly
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post:
Falko
Not yet, but will probably come so.
But that will probably run on it then, that it does not apply to ongoing proceedings then at the time of the entry into force of this law already exist. So at least the statement of the law firm where I am (with hand held out, because not yet officially)
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
Drive down a little bit you clown.I have only asked a question.
So don't tell me about reading and understanding, just stick to it yourself.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
Even if it was only "clown", I approached you in comparable form? So please.
And if you had read everything, this question would have been superfluous.
This post has been translated automatically