Online Casinos in general: MGA plans unified blocking system (Page 2)

Stromberg wrote on 04.06.2018 at 07:57
Just think how many players would be missing then all at once the mga casinos...most have you out of frustration or even for protection already let somewhere block...

This post has been translated automatically

Daniel wrote on 04.06.2018 at 08:13
Many lock themselves for the most part out of frustration and partly try to sue their way back into the casinos later (in Germany). To avoid such short-circuit reactions, you can only be blocked forever by presenting a psycholigical certificate. In Malta, there are by default only the blocking options 6 months or 1 year. Of course, you can get banned for 6 months if you are frustrated and if you decide to get banned for good during the 6 months, then it is very easy to get such a certificate so that you can get banned for good.

Sure, the MGA casinos will be missing some players but so is the landbased casinos there. Since some can be blocked for a certain time - I've done myself.

With this step, even the mafia Online Casinos in Malta would have better Player protection than in the banana republic of Germany (keyword: machines in pubs, gas stations, gambling, etc.). Actually, they already do, but the practical implementation is still a disaster, because it is impossible to lock yourself in all casinos.

It is actually an indictment and a hypocrisy that the German state always argues with the poor player and youth protection against private providers. The protection of minors in Germany is forn ass, because in some pubs or kebab shops no sow is interested in whether young people play on their machines. Only specialized, licensed companies should be allowed to set up slot machines. The protection of minors is also better in online casinos than in the offline sector in Germany. If you search the Internet, you will not find a single complaint from players who did not get their win paid out because the casino found out that the player was underage

The only scandal in this direction that I know of is the story from Casinotest24. Here, however, the father has participated in the action and perhaps Lapalingo(?). If the father has participated in the thing, then it is about as if the father buys his son in the supermarket a bottle of vodka to drink. The father and not the supermarket is ultimately responsible for this. Whether Lapalingo knew about it is of course a matter of speculation, but it is being investigated and if it turns out that Lapalingo knew about it, then we would be the first to publish it and Blacklist Lapalingo.

The player protection in Germany is also completely forn ass, because every banned player can still gamble away his fortune in gambling houses, gas stations, snack bars, etc.. Depending on the amount of the assets, it just takes a little longer here.

This post has been translated automatically