there is just one more twist in the Gammix affair.
A meeting has not taken place, there has been no vote and for the time being there is no settlement solution.
Over the weekend, the administrator was asked by several German law firms to provide the necessary documents. He was informed that he was not fulfilling his duties. As a result, the administrator still did not provide any documents and canceled the meeting on his own initiative. By the end of the month, there was not even a time for the meeting. The administrator's behavior is simply out of line.
He then informed us in an email that the clients' claims due to Bill55 should actually be valued at 0 and that he should therefore not pay any more; he should not behave "unlawfully" and should not value the claims higher.
Letter received Settlement negotiations with Gammix
5th Apr. 2025, at 03:29 pm CEST#50
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Tommi wrote on 05.04.2025 at 12:35: Can't open link. Which law firm did the feedback come from? In any case, AKH does not get back to me. I also wonder how glückzurück did it so quickly.
I don't know either. The author gave a lot of updates and the creditors' meetings were also quite early, but the administrator then refused and simply canceled appointments and for whatever reason is standing in the way because of bill 55 because he thinks it is protected, which is idiotic.
Of course, it would be positive if he were punished for this in our favor, but I don't think so
Letter received Settlement negotiations with Gammix
Liked this post:
hardcoverdude
Dear Sir or Madam,
there is just one more twist in the Gammix affair.
A meeting has not taken place, there has been no vote and for the time being there is no settlement solution.
Over the weekend, the administrator was asked by several German law firms to provide the necessary documents. He was informed that he was not fulfilling his duties. As a result, the administrator still did not provide any documents and canceled the meeting on his own initiative. By the end of the month, there was not even a time for the meeting. The administrator's behavior is simply out of line.
He then informed us in an email that the clients' claims due to Bill55 should actually be valued at 0 and that he should therefore not pay any more; he should not behave "unlawfully" and should not value the claims higher.
I moved out of the FAGS🥲
This post has been translated automatically
Letter received Settlement negotiations with Gammix
Nobody has liked this post so far
link?
This post has been translated automatically
Letter received Settlement negotiations with Gammix
Nobody has liked this post so far
https://www.forum-gluecksspielsucht.de/forum/index.php/topic,6880.msg74154/topicseen.html#msg74154
First contribution
This post has been translated automatically
Letter received Settlement negotiations with Gammix
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Letter received Settlement negotiations with Gammix
Nobody has liked this post so far
I don't know either. The author gave a lot of updates and the creditors' meetings were also quite early, but the administrator then refused and simply canceled appointments and for whatever reason is standing in the way because of bill 55 because he thinks it is protected, which is idiotic.
Of course, it would be positive if he were punished for this in our favor, but I don't think so
This post has been translated automatically